William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
Do note that not all users that will chose the SSL package will know how
to correctly fill in the fields.
s/not all/a small minority of/
They can't figure out what Domain Name means, let's be serious :)
On 1/10/07, *Issac Goldstand*
Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
On 1/10/07, *William A. Rowe, Jr.* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
Do note that not all users that will chose the SSL package will
know how
to correctly fill in the fields.
s/not all/a small
On 1/11/07, Issac Goldstand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
./configure; make; make install
We don't deposit a certificate today for Unix. After considering
this a bit
more, I agree with jerenkrantz.
True... if you don't enable mod_ssl by default and add a note in the
conf
Drew,
I can only respond to two of your questions (intelligently):
First, how do I return valuable information if there's a config error?
For example, if my config has the directive MyFile conf/foo.txt and
the file doesn't exist, how can I report this when I run httpd -t?
If the error can
Hi,
could someone please add version 2.2.4 to the product Apache httpd-2 in
bugzilla?
Are there any ideas how we can document / automate this as part of the release
process?
This issue pops up regulary after each release.
Regards
Rüdiger
On Jan 11, 2007, at 12:42 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
could someone please add version 2.2.4 to the product Apache
httpd-2 in bugzilla?
Done.
Are there any ideas how we can document / automate this as part of
the release process?
This issue pops up regulary after each release.
Hard to
Issac Goldstand wrote:
I'd agree if mod_ssl is disabled by default, but if it is, why are they
downloading the mod_ssl-enabled installer?
You miss the point, it's illegal in some jurisdictions to possess/use
such cryptography. That installer will remain as a service to those
communities,
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Hi,
could someone please add version 2.2.4 to the product Apache httpd-2 in
bugzilla?
Are there any ideas how we can document / automate this as part of the
release process?
This issue pops up regulary after each release.
My bad, sorry, it's already been done.
On 01/11/2007 10:12 PM, Sander Temme wrote:
On Jan 11, 2007, at 12:42 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
could someone please add version 2.2.4 to the product Apache httpd-2
in bugzilla?
Done.
Thanks.
Are there any ideas how we can document / automate this as part of
the release
On 01/11/2007 10:22 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Hi,
could someone please add version 2.2.4 to the product Apache httpd-2 in
bugzilla?
Are there any ideas how we can document / automate this as part of the
release process?
This issue pops up regulary after each
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rpluem
Date: Thu Jan 11 14:48:47 2007
New Revision: 495422
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=495422
Log:
* - Clarified location of release.sh script
- minotaur is an internal server name. Replaced it with people.apache.org
- Added a
On Jan 11, 2007, at 1:40 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
A week sounds good to me. I guess some of them are my fault as I
only set
them to resolved fixed and never visited them again as I thought
that they reached
their final state. Now I found out that you only have the option to
close it once
We don't seem to be getting any more feedback on 3.3.0b (+1's across the
board), so how does everyone feel about rolling out 3.3.1 this weekend?
Or should we wait another week?
3.3.0b test result summary:
+1 FreeBSD 6.1, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3,1
+1 Linux Debian 3.1 Sarge,
This code in req.readlines() looks a bit fishy to me and possibly leaks memory.
The code in question is:
rlargs = PyTuple_New(0);
if (result == NULL)
return PyErr_NoMemory();
line = req_readline(self, rlargs);
while (line ((linesize=PyString_Size(line))0)) {
14 matches
Mail list logo
