flood reg ex matching problems

2008-02-21 Thread John ORourke
Hi folks, I grabbed flood from svn and built it according to the instructions at http://httpd.apache.org/test/flood/ I've been getting 'Regular expression match failed' most of the time, and even tried running one of the examples: -- [EMAIL

Re: apxs on Win32?

2008-02-21 Thread Issac Goldstand
Randy Kobes wrote: On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Guenter Knauf wrote: Hi (Bill?), another dev just asked me privately about apxs for Win32 does this meanwhile work on Win32? And if so can we perhaps ship it with future distros? I think that would make sense since the include and lib dir is already

Re: svn commit: r629615 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES docs/manual/mod/mod_charset_lite.html.en docs/manual/mod/mod_charset_lite.xml modules/filters/mod_charset_lite.c

2008-02-21 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 4:17 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: covener Date: Wed Feb 20 13:17:17 2008 New Revision: 629615 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=629615view=rev Log: *) mod_charset_lite: Add ForceAllMimeTypes sub-option to CharsetOptions, allowing the

Re: svn commit: r629615 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES docs/manual/mod/mod_charset_lite.html.en docs/manual/mod/mod_charset_lite.xml modules/filters/mod_charset_lite.c

2008-02-21 Thread Eric Covener
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 4:17 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: covener Date: Wed Feb 20 13:17:17 2008 New Revision: 629615 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=629615view=rev Log: *)

Re: svn commit: r629615 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES docs/manual/mod/mod_charset_lite.html.en docs/manual/mod/mod_charset_lite.xml modules/filters/mod_charset_lite.c

2008-02-21 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Feb 21, 2008, at 9:07 AM, Eric Covener wrote: On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 4:17 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: covener Date: Wed Feb 20 13:17:17 2008 New Revision: 629615 URL:

Re: apxs on Win32?

2008-02-21 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi Randy, There's a perl script that emulates apxs on Win32 available in apxs_win32.tar.gz at http://perl.apache.org/dist/win32-bin/ perfect answer since the one who asked me did that for mod_perl! Right now this is installed assuming an already-installed Apache; if there's interest, I

Re: apxs on Win32?

2008-02-21 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Guenter Knauf wrote: if the one we have in ./support works already with 3rd-party modules (other than mod_perl) on Win32 then we can just use that; otherwise I'm +1 to add yours. It does not, its crafted from libtool-junk last time I looked, and requires apr similarly provisioned (apr-config

mod_proxy / ProxyTimeout fix 2.0.63

2008-02-21 Thread Ronald Park
Hi Folks, After fumbling up a previous attempt to send in this patch, I'm going to try again, making sure to attach the patch this time. :) The following patch makes mod_proxy truly use ProxyTimeout for the actual sending and receiving of the proxied request; as it's currently implemented, it

Re: mod_proxy / ProxyTimeout fix 2.0.63

2008-02-21 Thread Jim Jagielski
Thanks for the patch. I'll review this as well as see if 2.2 is affected... On Feb 21, 2008, at 2:29 PM, Ronald Park wrote: Hi Folks, After fumbling up a previous attempt to send in this patch, I'm going to try again, making sure to attach the patch this time. :) The following patch makes

Re: httpd 2.2.8 segfaults

2008-02-21 Thread Niklas Edmundsson
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Niklas Edmundsson wrote: In any case, I should probably try to figure out how to reproduce this thing. All coredumps I've looked at have been when serving DVD images, which of course works flawlessly when I try it... OK, I've been able to reproduce this, and it looks

Re: httpd 2.2.8 segfaults

2008-02-21 Thread Brian Rectanus
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Niklas Edmundsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Niklas Edmundsson wrote: In any case, I should probably try to figure out how to reproduce this thing. All coredumps I've looked at have been when serving DVD images, which of course works

Re: httpd 2.2.8 segfaults

2008-02-21 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 02/21/2008 10:09 PM, Niklas Edmundsson wrote: On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Niklas Edmundsson wrote: In any case, I should probably try to figure out how to reproduce this thing. All coredumps I've looked at have been when serving DVD images, which of course works flawlessly when I try it...

Re: httpd 2.2.8 segfaults

2008-02-21 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 02/21/2008 10:09 PM, Niklas Edmundsson wrote: On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Niklas Edmundsson wrote: In any case, I should probably try to figure out how to reproduce this thing. All coredumps I've looked at have been when serving DVD images, which of course works flawlessly when I try it...

Re: httpd 2.2.8 segfaults

2008-02-21 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 02/21/2008 10:33 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 02/21/2008 10:09 PM, Niklas Edmundsson wrote: On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Niklas Edmundsson wrote: In any case, I should probably try to figure out how to reproduce this thing. All coredumps I've looked at have been when serving DVD images, which

Re: httpd 2.2.8 segfaults

2008-02-21 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 02/21/2008 10:33 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 02/21/2008 10:09 PM, Niklas Edmundsson wrote: On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Niklas Edmundsson wrote: In any case, I should probably try to figure out how to reproduce this thing. All coredumps I've looked at have been when serving DVD images, which

Re: httpd 2.2.8 segfaults

2008-02-21 Thread Niklas Edmundsson
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Ruediger Pluem wrote: Quick, maybe completely stupid question as I suspect the problem in apr_brigade_partition: Quick answer before I go to bed :) I always thought that apr_off_t and apr_size_t are *always* of the same size and that the only difference between them is

Re: httpd 2.2.8 segfaults

2008-02-21 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 02/21/2008 11:59 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Ruediger Pluem wrote: I always thought that apr_off_t and apr_size_t are *always* of the same size and that the only difference between them is that apr_size_t is unsigned whereas apr_off_t is signed. Is this thought correct? NO NO NO

Re: httpd 2.2.8 segfaults

2008-02-21 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Ruediger Pluem wrote: I always thought that apr_off_t and apr_size_t are *always* of the same size and that the only difference between them is that apr_size_t is unsigned whereas apr_off_t is signed. Is this thought correct? NO NO NO no no. off_t represents an index to storage (io