Any reason to differ from trunk in 2.4?
The people using spdy already in a 2.4 will most likely have the NPN patch
deployed, so they'll have it easy with the trunk changes. The only one using
the alpn patch, I know of, is myself in mod_h2. And that has already been
adapted.
So, I myself see n
It seems reasonable to focus on ALPN support, and generally dropping
NPN from trunk. NPN is already on a decline, and won't be used going
forward.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:44 AM, Stefan Eissing
wrote:
> Any reason to differ from trunk in 2.4?
>
> The people using spdy already in a 2.4 will most
On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 00:36:23 +0200
Graham Leggett wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am picking apart some strange behaviour where use of the Alias
> directive inside a Location along with a file path that doesn’t exist
> (/_thumbs/i/dont/exist.jpg) triggers a loop of redirects to
> …/index.html/index.html/i
On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 10:49:47 -0400
Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Apologies for not hacking on motorz lately... will ramp up :)
>
> BTW: Would it make sense to consider a release of 2.4.13 in April
> to coincide w/ ApacheCon?
We've historically produced a release at the beginning of the con.
It worked
On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 08:28:35 +1000
Noel Butler wrote:
>
> Time to think about EOL'ing 2.2 maybe since its 10 years old and 2.4
> has been current stable best production recommendation for what,
> about 3.5 years or so now, that would see adoption rates grow ;)
That would be altogether reasonabl