G/E,
Attached a patch to add two more symbols for mod_proxy export (needed by
proxy_bancer) and a NWGNUproxyhcheck to create proxyhcheck.nlm,
referenced in the NWGNUmakefile but not previously supplied.
Norm
Index: modules/proxy/NWGNUproxy
==
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> Right, though several people have requested it now as errata. Seems likely
> to be in the final update for STD.
>
In the HttpProtocolOptions Unsafe mode, it is tolerated.
Should it be the proper 'Strict' behavior to parse (never generate
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 3:54 AM, William A Rowe Jr
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Roy T. Fielding
> wrote:
>
>> Right, though several people have requested it now as errata. Seems
>> likely to be in the final update for STD.
>>
>
> In the HttpProtocolOptions Unsafe mode, it is tolerat
Anyone...? Any ideas??
> On Oct 11, 2016, at 12:34 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On HEAD of httpd-2.4, the test framework fails on headers.t:
>
> header: [FooBar] vs [Foo Bar]
> # testing : compare header Hello value
> # expected: 'Foo Bar'
> # received: 'FooBar'
> not ok 3
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Anyone...? Any ideas??
This seems to come from r1756746, which I think should be trunk
specific (for now).
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Anyone...? Any ideas??
>
> This seems to come from r1756746, which I think should be trunk
> specific (for now).
The attached works for me..
Index: t/apache/headers.t
==
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> Anyone...? Any ideas??
>>
>> This seems to come from r1756746, which I think should be trunk
>> specific (for now).
>
> The attac
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> Anyone...? Any ideas??
>>
>> This seems to come from r1756746, which I think should be trunk
>> specific (for now).
>
> The attac
Thanks. Another option in these cases is to mark the test TODO and
gracefully ignore it's failure, but this fix is fine in the interim.
On Oct 15, 2016 10:35 AM, "Yann Ylavic" wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Yann Ylavic
> wrote:
Am 14.10.2016 um 22:48 schrieb wr...@apache.org:
Author: wrowe
Date: Fri Oct 14 20:48:43 2016
New Revision: 1764961
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1764961&view=rev
Log:
Dropped the never-released ap_has_cntrls() as it had very limited
and inefficient application at that, added ap_scan_vc
Yes, sorry... I meant to commit these all at once. Patch incoming.
On Oct 15, 2016 6:23 PM, "Rainer Jung" wrote:
> Am 14.10.2016 um 22:48 schrieb wr...@apache.org:
>
>> Author: wrowe
>> Date: Fri Oct 14 20:48:43 2016
>> New Revision: 1764961
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1764961&v
I see you made nearly all the adjustments I missed, apologies that I
neglected the includes/ update.
On Oct 15, 2016 9:01 PM, "William A Rowe Jr" wrote:
> Yes, sorry... I meant to commit these all at once. Patch incoming.
>
> On Oct 15, 2016 6:23 PM, "Rainer Jung" wrote:
>
>> Am 14.10.2016 um
NP, thanks!
Am 16.10.2016 um 04:35 schrieb William A Rowe Jr:
I see you made nearly all the adjustments I missed, apologies that I
neglected the includes/ update.
On Oct 15, 2016 9:01 PM, "William A Rowe Jr" mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net>> wrote:
Yes, sorry... I meant to commit these all at
13 matches
Mail list logo