Re: mod_http2 and Frequent wake-ups for mpm_event

Hi Yann, this is now a segfault with mod_http2 + beam v4 patch + mpm v7 patch: Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. #0 allocator_free (node=0x0, allocator=0x7f8974080c90) at memory/unix/apr_pools.c:381 #0 allocator_free (node=0x0, allocator=0x7f8974080c90) at

Re: mod_http2 and canceled requests logs status 500 internal server error code

Hi, Am 27.01.2017 um 18:59 schrieb Stefan Eissing: > Out now: https://github.com/icing/mod_h2/releases/tag/1.8.11 fresh from > Apache svn trunk+2.4.x > > I could not reproduce the 500 behaviour, but added a check on the recent > change on response generation. Hope this helps. thanks will

Re: mod_http2 and Frequent wake-ups for mpm_event

On 01/27/2017 08:10 PM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote: > Hi Yann, > > this is now a segfault with mod_http2 + beam v4 patch + mpm v7 patch: > Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > #0 allocator_free (node=0x0, allocator=0x7f8974080c90) > at

Re: [proposed] 2.4 Maintenance SIG

On 24/01/2017 13:58, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Noel Butler wrote: > >> Perhaps the only person who wont bend over and take it up the arse like some >> people here expect, if I have an opinion, i'll voice it > > Noel, your immediately

Re: [proposed] 2.4 Maintenance SIG

On 23/01/2017 19:14, Stefan Eissing wrote: > Am 23.01.2017 um 02:52 schrieb Noel Butler : > > On 20/01/2017 07:45, Jacob Champion wrote: > > On 01/19/2017 12:52 PM, Noel Butler wrote: Frequent releases set off alarms > in system admins minds, frequent > releases give

Re: [proposed] 2.4 Maintenance SIG

On 24/01/2017 20:22, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 23.01.2017 um 02:52 schrieb Noel Butler: > >> Perhaps the only person who wont bend over and take it up the arse like >> some people here expect, if I have an opinion, i'll voice it > > no, you are just a hypocrite trying to forbid others voice

Re: Summary: Broken FastCGI with httpd

> On Jan 26, 2017, at 6:13 PM, Jacob Champion wrote: > > > +1 (just not for 2.4.26, per my OP in the thread -- there is no way I can > find around the current PHP-FPM "fixups" without compatibility-breaking > behavior). > Let me relook over fpm-main... from what I

Re: Summary: Broken FastCGI with httpd

2017-01-27 13:56 GMT+01:00 Jim Jagielski : > > > On Jan 26, 2017, at 6:13 PM, Jacob Champion > wrote: > > > > > > +1 (just not for 2.4.26, per my OP in the thread -- there is no way I > can find around the current PHP-FPM "fixups" without

Re: Summary: Broken FastCGI with httpd

Ahh... thanks! Yeah, it looks like other than removing the prefix (and host:port), it does nothing more Apache-wise. > On Jan 27, 2017, at 8:28 AM, Luca Toscano wrote: > > > > 2017-01-27 13:56 GMT+01:00 Jim Jagielski : > > > On Jan 26, 2017, at 6:13

Re: [proposed] 2.4 Maintenance SIG

On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 6:22 AM, Noel Butler wrote: > I never object to any sensible opinion. > > Harry, you were warned never to reply or respond to me, because you know > what happens if you do, i'll assume you were off your meds again when you > clicked reply and

Openssl 1.1.x compatibility

Hi everybody, once in a while on users@ it is asked if httpd 2.4.x supports Openssl 1.1.x, but afaik http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x-openssl-1.1.0-compat is still work in progress. Any plans to release this work during the next months? It would be really great, but I am

Re: [proposed] 2.4 Maintenance SIG

You need some edumacation, I've avoided getting involved in these comments but I think this has to be said. Reindl is a long time well known troll, a highly caustic and abusive one, he's been kicked off more industry mailing lists than you've probably had hot dinners for it, some other lists,

Re: [proposed] 2.4 Maintenance SIG

On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Nick Edwards wrote: > You need some edumacation We're well aware of his notoriety and their relationship. I personally don't care about motives or backstory for off-topic shit-posting.

Re: [proposed] 2.4 Maintenance SIG

On 01/27/2017 04:21 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Nick Edwards > wrote: >> You need some edumacation > > We're well aware of his notoriety and their relationship. I > personally don't care about motives or backstory for off-topic >

Re: [proposed] 2.4 Maintenance SIG

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKGjOE_7bYI

Re: [proposed] 2.4 Maintenance SIG

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 5:22 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > no, you are just a hypocrite trying to forbid others voice their opinion in > their weay but not follow your own rules to always say critics nice and > lovely and so you have no point to play internet police on

Re: Summary: Broken FastCGI with httpd

On 01/27/2017 04:56 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Let me relook over fpm-main... from what I saw, there are only 2 logic paths: one if Apache and the other for everybody-else... and the Apache path only kicks in if it sees the proxy:balancer or proxy:fcgi prefix. Unfortunately there are at least

Re: mod_http2 and canceled requests logs status 500 internal server error code

Out now: https://github.com/icing/mod_h2/releases/tag/1.8.11 fresh from Apache svn trunk+2.4.x I could not reproduce the 500 behaviour, but added a check on the recent change on response generation. Hope this helps. Cheers, Stefan > Am 26.01.2017 um 16:36 schrieb Stefan Eissing