On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 08:10:57AM -0500, Eric Covener wrote:
> I count myself as a release vote of last resort only, but i don't
> think we should be committing to future fixes/releases if nearly
> everyone is in this category.
Thanks for raising it here, Eric. Same for me.
Regards, Joe
Le 12/02/2024 à 09:37, jor...@apache.org a écrit :
Author: jorton
Date: Mon Feb 12 08:37:35 2024
New Revision: 1915740
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1915740=rev
Log:
Merge r1825120 from trunk:
* modules/ssl/ssl_engine_init.c (ssl_init_PushCAList): Remove function.
On 2/16/24 2:10 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
>> Will apreq 2.18 still be released?
>
> I think we should, but we need someone to do the release work and 3
> active PMC members to approve it. Prior to the recent activity, the
> subproject was essentially unchanged and unreleased for 10 years (with
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 9:22 AM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/16/24 2:10 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> >> Will apreq 2.18 still be released?
> >
> > I think we should, but we need someone to do the release work and 3
> > active PMC members to approve it. Prior to the recent activity, the
> >
Joe, you've been warned before to moderate your language. This ends now.
It is completely unacceptable to insult other members of the community
like this one time, let alone repeatedly. It is unproductive,
unprofessional, and in violation of the ASF code of conduct. I've taken
the decision as
> Will apreq 2.18 still be released?
I think we should, but we need someone to do the release work and 3
active PMC members to approve it. Prior to the recent activity, the
subproject was essentially unchanged and unreleased for 10 years (with
1 failed release due to lack of votes)
I would like
Will apreq 2.18 still be released?
On 16/02/2024 09:44, Joe Orton wrote:
Joe, you've been warned before to moderate your language. This ends now.
It is completely unacceptable to insult other members of the community
like this one time, let alone repeatedly. It is unproductive,
unprofessional,