On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, [ISO-8859-15] André Malo wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unless anyone strenuously objects, I'm adding back the comments
regarding ScriptInterpreterSource. We're getting an increasing number of
questions about this.
I'm -0 on it, because using
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Jeff Trawick wrote:
What must be done to the bug tracker we have now to track the patches better?
(I'm not against having something better, but I don't want to see a delay in
waiting for some magic tool.)
We can already assign the keyword PatchAvailable for entries and
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
stoddard2003/11/20 11:44:19
Modified:.CHANGES
server/mpm/winnt child.c mpm.h
Log:
Win32: Make Win32 MPM transaction pools honor MaxMemFree
There's a very small doc change needed here too. (Just add
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, [ISO-8859-15] André Malo wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If there are sites out there that ignore the piece about the content living
outside the filesystem, my previous patch which requires no new
configuration might create problems. This version adds an
I just want to add a couple notes here on what I see as user-expectations.
The problem is that you want to add layers of additional directives, which
would change the behavior of Directory or Location ,
only Location , in a way that IMO is consistent with the existing
documentation, but
I do, however, agree that doing a directory-walk on virtual resources is
not nice. But my opinion is that virtualness is a property of the
resource, and hence should be designated when selecting the resource.
That is why I suggested changing SetHandler rather than Location.
And perhaps I'm
[This is probably a question better suited to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 7 Feb 2004, GEORGE JOSEPH wrote:
I am developing a client program which communicates
with the Apache server to download files in its
/var/www/html/media directory.
I wish to get the Index listing of the above
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Brian Akins wrote:
Location /dynamic-stuff
SetHandler virtual-dynamic-handler
/Location
Alias /normal/stuff/dyn /dynamic-stuff
How would all this affect this situation? IE, we would still need to
know that /normal/stuff/dyn/1/2/test.html became
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Brett E. wrote:
We recommend that HTTP server implementors, and in particular, CGI
implementors support the use of ; in place of to save authors the
trouble of escaping characters in this manner.
So maybe we should conform to the spec and support both styles.
Huh?
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
As I mentioned to the [EMAIL PROTECTED]'ers I would feel much safer moving 2.1-dev
over to SVN (with APR 1.0) and leaving 2.0/apr 0.9 alone to the end of
their useful life.
Ugh. That sounds like it will make back-porting even more of a pain
Question: Why are we involved in this at all? Wouldn't people publishing
in these languages know much more about the relevant character sets and
the filename extensions that they want to use? Can't we just remove all
of these from httpd.conf (except the ones necessary for the docs and the
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
I guess it's just to give a good out-of-the-box experience !
(Oh look - apache understands my language pretty nicely - that's neat :) )
But does anyone really use those languages with those particular
extensions? Don't 99% of people just
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Edward Rudd wrote:
I do have to question the *idea* of hacking an RFC compliant module to
support non RFC behavior? I know for Cyrus IMAP their stance is not to
break with the RFC, but to have the consumers complain to the MUA
creator to fix their bug. Though this
Didn't we decide in the move to 2.0 that all directives would take an
argument? Win32DisableAcceptex seems to work just by being present in the
config with no argument. Shouldn't it instead be
Win32DisableAcceptex on|off
Joshua.
On Mon, 22 Mar 2004, Bill Stoddard wrote:
Joshua Slive wrote:
Didn't we decide in the move to 2.0 that all directives would take an
argument?
Maybe I wasn't paying attention.
As far as I know, there are no other directives in httpd-2.0 that act this
way. But I may be mistaken
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Henri Gomez wrote:
Also the Content-Length is set to the size of the
plain request (not the size of the compressed request).
Is it correct or should it send the Content-Length with
the size of the compressed request ?
In such case, it seems that mod_deflate INPUT
On Thu, 8 Apr 2004, Geoffrey Young wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
geoff 2004/04/08 17:56:26
Modified:.CHANGES
server core.c
Log:
Enable special ErrorDocument value 'default' which restores the
canned server response for the scope of the
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nd 2004/04/10 14:44:43
Modified:.CHANGES
server core.c
Log:
accept URLs as ServerAdmin contact. If it's not recognized as an URL, assume
an email address and prepend it with mailto: in server
I do have one question about this: Is anyone actually using mod_digest?
I was under the impression that there doesn't exist any client that can
interoperate with this module (as opposed to mod_auth_digest, which
supports modern clients). If this is true, why don't we just delete the
darn thing?
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
pMD5 authentication provides a more secure password system,
but only works with supporting browsers. As of this writing
-(January 2002), the only major browsers which support digest
-authentication are a
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Mooky Mooksgill wrote:
I want to use MultiViews, as my pages have recently switched from .htm
to .html
I have turned on MultiViews for my VirtualHost, but eg, /about.htm
doesn't serve the existing /about.html.
Is this expected? When I ask for /about my about.html is
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Graham Leggett wrote:
The perchild mpm seems to be the closest thing to what I am looking for,
but the manual warns that it is not functional. Is this still the case?
Yes. I don't know of anyone successfully using perchild. There is another
group working on a successor
The URL has been posted on slashdot :-(
Joshua.
On Fri, 7 May 2004, Aaron Bannert wrote:
Why is it bad if people download the RC version and
test it? Frankly, I really don't mind if slashdot or anyone
else broadcasts that we have an RC tarball available.
The problem was that they called it a release, not an RC. I added the
header.html to
On Thu, 20 May 2004, Binam, Jesse wrote:
I apologize if this is the wrong forum. I saw in the documentation that
the perchild mpm development has ceased. I have looked on apache.org for
info but did not find anything. I am curious if anyone in here can tell
me where else I might look for
On Thu, 20 May 2004, Sascha Kersken wrote:
You might want to try metux MPM instead; it provides similar functionality
and works all right: http://www.metux.de/mpm/
metux... That's the name I keep forgetting.
But you might note that your website is not very useful since the download
link is
On Tue, 25 May 2004, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
I have a patch that achieves the purpose - but it's more of a hack. I'm
looking for suggestions to clean it up.
Here's the current logic :
- user invokes apachectl updatecrl which sends a SIGUSR2 signal to the
parent process
Question from an
On Tue, 25 May 2004, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
Here's the current logic :
- user invokes apachectl updatecrl which sends a SIGUSR2 signal to
the parent process
Question from an innocent bystander: Is there some reason that
apachectl
graceful isn't good enough for this situation?
AIUI, the
On Sat, 5 Jun 2004, Jeff Trawick wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The patch here: http://drbacchus.com/files/access_logging_patch.txt for
2.0.49 creates logs that look like this:
[Fri May 28 22:19:16 2004] [notice] Apache/2.0.49 (Unix) configured --
resuming
normal operations
[Fri
On Sat, 5 Jun 2004, Rici Lake wrote:
What about keeping the old error message, but logging an *additional*
message at loglevel debug with the additional info?
That is certainly possible but I was trying to make things as easy as possible
for newbies. I think having both modules available,
On Tue, 8 Jun 2004, Greg Ames wrote:
There are sites/workloads where keepalive timeouts tie up the majority of the
active threads or processes, such as our own web site as seen at
http://apache.org/server-status . I also see a lot of Ks when running
specweb99 on a stock httpd. Since we are
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Sascha Kersken wrote:
Hi all,
wouldn't it be a nice idea to make the http://httpd.apache.org/download.cgi
script accept the name of the requested file (e.g. httpd-2.0.50.tar.gz) as
path info and pass it to the automatically selected mirror? This would allow
everyone to
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Astrid Keßler wrote:
There is another script (with the same back-end) that does almost this.
See, for example:
http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/httpd/httpd-2.0.50.tar.gz
Cool. Is this script linked somewhere? Or there any description out
there at our site?
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, Graham Leggett wrote:
Hi all,
Where do historical binaries get moved to (if anywhere)?
http://archives.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/
Joshua.
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, Joshua Slive wrote:
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, Graham Leggett wrote:
Hi all,
Where do historical binaries get moved to (if anywhere)?
http://archives.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/
Ahhh Make that
http://archive.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/
And note that the moving is automatic
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, Graham Leggett wrote:
And note that the moving is automatic: everything from
www.apache.org/dist/ goes there automatically, and nothing is ever
deleted.
Automatic as in a script does it? I just moved the old release I was
replacing manually from
On Sun, 4 Jul 2004, [ISO-8859-15] André Malo wrote:
My proposal is to introduce an additional DEBUG keyword to the
Header and RequestHeader directives. Headers marked as DEBUG will
be set in post_read_request, so they are available to other modules.
Without DEBUG, it will default to
On Sun, 4 Jul 2004, Kenneth Simpson wrote:
mod_ssl doesn't change when upgrading from Apache 2.0.49 to Apache 2.0.50.
This would happen if you had mod_ssl installed as a DSO but didn't specify
--enable-ssl=shared on the ./configure command line when upgrading. The
old module would remain.
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, Joe Orton wrote:
I'm beginning to think the only sane way to fix the byterange filter is
to have it do nothing if it isn't passed a complete EOS-terminated
brigade with a predetermined length, i.e. no morphing CGI buckets which
will eat all your RAM when they get -read().
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi,
In Platform Specific Notes for EBCDIC,
http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/platform/ebcdic.html,
it could be worth to mentions another EBCDIC platform who
support and use Apache 2.0, iSeries (AS/400).
Also in the Third Party Modules' Status, you could add
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Graham Leggett wrote:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
I don't understand why mod_cache forcedly avoids caching URLs ending with
the / (slash) character.
Apparently EGP (who's he?) agrees.
Anyhow, it's several months that we're running with this patch in
production, and nothing bad
Graham Leggett wrote:
The httpd serves the static content feature can be implemented through
extending ProxyPass to support regular expressions, for example:
This can be done now with mod_rewrite:
RewriteRule (.*\.jsp)$ http://backend/$1 [P]
Joshua.
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Dan Wilga wrote:
[Fri Jul 02 11:14:30 2004] [info] Initial (No.1) HTTPS request received for
child 0 (server [server name]:443)
[Fri Jul 02 11:14:30 2004] [info] (104)Connection reset by peer:
core_output_filter: writing data to the network
[Fri Jul 02 11:14:30 2004] [error]
On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Wednesday, August 4, 2004 4:52 PM -0400 Brian Akins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The thing that sucks is if you vary on User-Agent. You wind up with a ton
of entries per uri. I cheated in another modules by varying on an
environmental variable.
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, g g wrote:
I am trying to install apache 1.3.31 with proxy module enabled. I am
using following option to configure the apache 1.3.31 on aix 5.1 m/c:
./configure --prefix=path of apache --enable-module=so
--enable-module=proxy
After installation there is no LoadModule
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Geoffrey Young wrote:
so, can someone comment on what 2.2 (and the subsequent 2.3) mean for 2.0?
that is, if everyday hacking is against 2.3 and we propose a new feature to
backport, do we backport to both 2.2 and 2.0? or does it mean that 2.0 has
reached
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Sunday, August 15, 2004 7:30 PM -0700 Mathihalli, Madhusudan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought the 8K limit was a compile-time constant.
http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/core.html#limitrequestfieldsize
8190 is just our default. HTH. --
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Brian Akins wrote:
Shouldn't we still set Vary: Accept-Encoding if no-gzip is set? Example,
if I use SetEnvIf to disallow gzip for some browsers, shouldn't we still tell
proxies to vary on Accept-Encoding? mod_deflate will send the Vary if the
client does not have a
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dtcode--enable-auth-ldap/code/dt
I suspect the above line needs to be changed too.
ddEnable LDAP based authentication provided by
- modulemod_auth_ldap/module./dd
+ modulemod_authnz_ldap/module./dd
Joshua.
On Mon, 30 Aug 2004, Paul Querna wrote:
1) Upgrade Bugzilla a newer version. We currently have 2.14.2
installed. 2.16.6 is the latest stable release of Bugzilla (They are
doing Release Canidates of 2.18.X right now too!). It has nice things,
like a NEEDINFO state, so we can mark bugs that need
Thinking about this a little more...
2) Add More Components to Bugzilla. Here is my list of components I
would like to see added for our Project:
- Windows Installer
- Windows Build
Are these really necessary? We have a build category already, and we
could have a similar install category.
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Wallace, Brian S. wrote:
Are there any tricks that can be done like telling the browser to clear
the password cache or have the browser return the realm name that it's
authenticating to? Any other ideas or approaches to this problem would
be appreciated.
The are many tricks
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, [ISO-8859-15] André Malo wrote:
A 30 KB default config, which nobody outside this circle here
really understands, isn't helpful - especially for beginners.
I agree that the current config file is too big and ugly. But let's be a
little careful here. There needs to be a
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, Manoj Kasichainula wrote:
How about separating the example and default configs? Make the default
config short, but provide an example config with all the meat that can be
easily cut-and-pasted.
Or put richer examples in the docs. We have been working on that a
little.
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I'm trying to understand what other anomalies you mean between
Unix and Win32, they aren't that dis-similar.
I was mainly refering to the big block of mpm-control directives near the
top.
But I like the suggestion of getting rid of almost all of
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Thom May wrote:
* Sander Striker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
Hi,
I've put the tarballs for 2.0.51 up at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/.
Please test and vote,
+1 on x86_64 linux. (Worker and prefork. perchild built but not tested)
+1
Running on ajax.apache.org
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Sander Striker wrote:
From: Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 4:49 PM
Thanks. I've moved the tarballs to the distribution area.
Could someone please take care of the httpd.apache.org site?
I'm in a bit of a bind currently (for at least
A straw-man proposal for a new config organization is at
http://www.apache.org/~slive/newconf/
What I've tried to do:
- Strip httpd.conf to only the config directives that almost everyone
needs to worry about.
- Put everything else in an extra/ directory, with commented-out Include
directives
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 01:08 PM 9/24/2004, Paul Querna wrote:
On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 13:12 -0400, Joshua Slive wrote:
A straw-man proposal for a new config organization is at
http://www.apache.org/~slive/newconf/
Looks pretty good. I think this is a good direction
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Brad Nicholes wrote:
Maybe I am jumping in here out of turn, but let me ask the obvious
question. Why would we want to split the standard base httpd.conf file
up into multiple files? Doesn't this end up just confusing the average
user? One thing that I always tell new
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Comments anyone?
Seeing all +1's and no objections, I'm planning to push this out
in the next hour or two.
The ?update argument to download.cgi should be changed to the date/time
that you drop the files into dist/httpd/. And you should try to wait
On 9/24/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: niq
Date: Sun Sep 24 15:29:59 2006
New Revision: 449514
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=449514
Log:
Add extra explanatory clause to VirtualHost docs
Modified:
httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/manual/mod/core.xml
On 10/24/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ dtcodesem/code/dt
+ ddThis directive tells the SSL Module to pick the best semaphore
+ implementation available to it, choosing between Posix and SystemV IPC,
+ in that order. It is only available when the underlying
On 11/29/06, Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, November 29, 2006 2:19 pm, Nick Kew wrote:
When the configuration is merged, the one that appears later in
httpd.conf overrides the other where there is conflict.
What constitutes a conflict?
What Satisfy value are you using?
On 12/5/06, Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 06:39:30AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
A lot of opinions were offered back in August. Some were negative but
I don't see anything that looks like a veto.
On 12/6/06, Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're up to two great answers to disable some output from the server
that isn't required by the HTTP protocol anyway:
1) modify the source
2) install third-party module
My support for the idea has nothing to do with improving the operation
of
Following up on a question on the users list, I found this blog entry:
http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/10/17/accept-language-header-for-internet-explorer-7.aspx
which says that IE7 now uses only language/locale pairs in the
Accept-Language header.
They follow this up with:
If a given
On 12/11/06, Fenlason, Josh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any way Apache could do the following?
1. Search for a match in the language and language-locale list
the client provides
2. If no match was found above, strip off the locale and try
again.
3. If there still
On 12/11/06, Fenlason, Josh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I swear that's the behavior I was seeing, but I must have had something
messed up. I just tested to verify my complaint and it appears to be
working the way I said I wanted it to. Not sure what I messed up, but I
must have gotten confused
On 2/8/07, Greg Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This consumption of server resource by one user is unfair to everyone else
trying to use http at the same time. Is it possible to control resource
allocation so that it is fair to all users?
The user in question is using some kind of download
On 2/8/07, Greg Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This consumption of resource seems unfair to other users that are trying to
use the system at the same time. Is it possible to control resource
allocation so that it is fair to all users?
Is there something about the response I made to your
On 2/8/07, Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/8/07, Greg Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This consumption of resource seems unfair to other users that are trying to
use the system at the same time. Is it possible to control resource
allocation so that it is fair to all users
On 2/12/07, Dziugas Baltrunas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to figure out the way how to put information in access log
(via mod_log_config) whether the request was a cache hit or miss
(similar to what squid does - TCP_MISS and TCP_HIT). I think this
information is necessary for any proxy
On 2/13/07, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Location /limited/ methods=GET POST HEAD
I like that a lot. It makes it clear that methods is an option (and
hence doesn't generally need to be there), and skirts the whole
ordering mess you get by adding a Method container.
Directory /dir/
On 2/26/07, Erica Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am developing some component, which need Apache to be able to listen
to two ports, instead of only one default port. I do not know if there
is some way to configure Apache http server to work in this way. I do
not want to configure it to be
On 3/5/07, Erica Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I want to cache the responses for XMLHttpRequest, that is dynamic
content. I have configureed http.conf using Expires to add headers to
those responses. However, I still could not find those responses to be
able to be cached by use of web
On 3/6/07, Joost de Heer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Xavier Beaudouin schreef:
Hello,
I am trying to find a portable way to find what is the version of apache
during compilation of a third party module.
In include/ap_release.h, the macros AP_SERVER_MAJORVERSION_NUMBER,
I just deleted all our binary releases from before 2005 that were
sitting in our recommended releases directory. They are, of course,
all still available from archive.apache.org.
With the exception of a few platforms, we just aren't in the business
of providing binaries anymore. I don't think
On 3/15/07, Torsten Foertsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The bug is simple, the patch is simple. Why haven't I got a single reply to my
mail? The bug is also still marked as new. What is the right way to report
problems?
You're doing fine. See:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/patches.html#ignored
On 3/21/07, Jan van den Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/patches.html
So who keeps this page up to date? Any reason why this info isn't yet
updated?
Because nobody has submitted a patch. (Kind of a circular problem, I
realize ;-)
Feel free to contribute.
Joshua.
On 3/23/07, System Support [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Randomly the mime-type of my .css files changes from text/css to
text/plain.
There were a couple of similar bugs reported against caching, but they
are shown as being fixed. I did try disabling caching, but it did not
seem to help.
I
On 3/26/07, Joe Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since forever, the documentation for Order claims this:
Yes, it's broken. It hasn't been that way forever, just since we tried
to improve the Order docs last year. I don't think a patch is really
necessary -- it is an easy enough fix. I'll see
On 4/27/07, FORAMITTI Laurent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I would like to know how is it possible to configure Apache to send some
informations about the authenticated user to my AppServer ?
Is it possible to add some values to the http header before that the mod_jk
or mod_wl forward the
On 4/27/07, Patrick Welche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I expected not to be prompted to login by the above configuration.
(also tried AuthBasicAuthoritative Off, and have read the fine manual..)
Just to eliminate the obvious, have you actually checked the
access_log to verify that the IP
On 4/27/07, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's beginning to look like Order, Allow, Deny, Satisfy can't be deprecated after all.
However I still think that there is a usefulness for the same type of authorization rules
defined by require.
I don't really understand why you say
On 5/2/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: bnicholes
Date: Wed May 2 09:31:39 2007
New Revision: 534533
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=534533
Log:
re-introduce ap_satisfies API back into core and modify how the access_checker,
check_user_id and auth_checker
On 5/2/07, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, that's where I mentioned that things might look a little confusing.
There actually is a good reason to have both and yes some of the functionality
can overlap. The reason for having mod_authz_host is so that host, IP, ENV,
etc. can
On 05/12/2007 04:12 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Sat May 12 07:12:24 2007
New Revision: 537429
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=537429
Log:
Add regex pattern matching to ProxyPass, allowing,
for example:
ProxyPass ~ \.gif balancer://imagecluster
On
Cross-posted and already answered on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 5/23/07, Marco Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to change a bahaviour on the rewrite of the apache server. Right now,
if I type in a path that does not exist (like /nopage.html) Apache will
serve up the 404 page (/html/404.html),
On 5/24/07, Yoav Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On 5/24/07, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/23/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a serious issue to determine, and I've asked for a 48 hour cooldown
of wiki.apache.org/httpd/ to make a decision,
On 5/24/07, Rich Bowen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 24, 2007, at 04:23, Tony Stevenson wrote:
AskApache has had several email conversations with both myself, and
Rich. In which he was asked politely, but firmly to not use links
to content on his site.
NOTE: NOT because external links
On 5/24/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[for infra, who is bcc'ed - three * bullets below]
* ask infra to reopen the wiki to general write access,
* aks infra to please revoke AskApache/their ip from the httpd wiki.
+1.
On 6/20/07, sonia mukherjee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
could any one give me information on whether any Api call is present with
Apche 2.2 that gives indication that Rwrite Rule is configured for a
particular URL. And if possible with full info on what are the flags that
are set (flags
On 6/25/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That said, have you considered a design where there are separate pools
of processes per-user, and these would be dispatched after the headers
are processed to the appropriate child?
The simplest option is to simply reuse the features
On 6/27/07, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a problem that could be solved by documentation.
Maybe not quite as simple, but when the alternative is accepting
new connections whilst running as root.
Here's a start:
http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/Recipes/Privilege_Separation
It could
On 6/27/07, Rici Lake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the user servers are listening on high ports, then they can be
started as the user/group rather than as root, and the owner could
have quite a bit of flexibility in configuring their server. It's
quite possible that less reliance on .htaccess
On 6/28/07, Niko Wilfritz Sianipar Sianipar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have some questions about apache configuration:
1. Does apache can be configured so he can order the clients according
to their throughput?
I don't know what you mean by order the clients.
2. How can apache know the
On 7/29/07, Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
The solution is to NOT rewrite the on-disk headers when the following
conditions are true:
- The body is NOT stale (ie. HTTP_NOT_MODIFIED when revalidating)
- The on-disk header hasn't expired.
- The request
On 8/2/07, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As for 2.x bugs, there are quite a few which are going to be
harder to deal with. Perhaps we want a new Archived status,
for PRs which have merit but which aren't going to get 'fixed'.
Particularly those with PatchAvailable.
I would just use
On 8/5/07, Vegard Svanberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-08-05 05:15]:
I've looked through the archives, but have not seen this mentioned again
since then. I was wondering if this has been discussed any further,
possibly moved to other mailing
1 - 100 of 597 matches
Mail list logo
