Re: CI for httpd 2.4 and trunk?

This is pretty interesting. A project I work on, Traffic Server, needs to improve the test infrastructure as well. In particular we need better integration and end-to-end tests. It feels there ought to be significant overlap here between ATS and HTTPD? Maybe we could pool development efforts?

Re: disable SSLv3 the same way SSLv2 was disabled in mod_ssl

We disabled SSLv3 in the defaults for Traffic Server as well. It's still available to be explicitly turned on though. -- Leif On Jan 2, 2015, at 12:18 PM, olli hauer oha...@gmx.de wrote: On 2015-01-02 19:31, Tim Bannister wrote: On 2 Jan 2015, at 18:18, olli hauer oha...@gmx.de wrote:

Re: disable SSLv3 the same way SSLv2 was disabled in mod_ssl

distributed by package managers, or the person installing / managing the software. Cheers, — Leif -- Tim Bannister - is...@c8h10n4o2.org.uk On 2 Jan 2015, at 19:38, Leif Hedstrom zw...@apache.org wrote: We disabled SSLv3 in the defaults for Traffic Server as well. It's still

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.12 as GA

On Jan 22, 2015, at 11:54 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.12 can be found at the usual place: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.12 GA. [X] +1: Good to go [ ]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.12 as GA

On Jan 26, 2015, at 10:21 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote: Am 26.01.2015 um 14:14 schrieb Eric Covener: On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 8:08 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: svn diff https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/tags/2.4.11

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.11 as GA

On Jan 15, 2015, at 12:10 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.11 can be found at the usual place: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.11 GA. [ ] +1: Good to go [ ]

Re: [APACHECON] Proposed httpd (and related) track

On Feb 11, 2015, at 7:11 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 16:06:14 -0700 Leif Hedstrom zw...@apache.org wrote: On Feb 10, 2015, at 12:36 PM, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: Here's my proposed httpd (and related) track. If anyone has any

Re: [APACHECON] Proposed httpd (and related) track

On Feb 10, 2015, at 12:36 PM, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: Here's my proposed httpd (and related) track. If anyone has any objections, changes, suggestions, whatever, please speak up. Thanks. Day 1: * Panel: The Apache Group greybeards: If I'd only known then (Don’t yet have

Re: Version check idea

On Apr 21, 2015, at 8:27 AM, Nick Kew n...@webthing.com wrote: On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 16:00:05 +0200 Dirk-Willem van Gulik di...@webweaving.org wrote: On 21 Apr 2015, at 15:55, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: For comment: What do people think about adding the capability that when

Re: Proposal/RFC: informed load balancing

I’m Cc: this to d...@trafficserver.apache.org, since I think this is something some of our dev would be interested in. There are a few other replies to this thread already, which can be seen on the archives. As has been mentioned in another reply, I think the header name ought to be something

[API proposal] TSHttpTxnCacheLookupUrlSet()

This new API is the inverse of an existing API, TSHttpTxnCacheLookupUrlGet(). It also works similar to another existing API, TSCacheUrlSet(). The main difference between this new API and TSCacheUrlSet() is that we work on normal URL objects. This can in some cases avoid unnecessary string

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.13 as GA

On Jun 4, 2015, at 12:33 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.13 can be found at the usual place: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.13 GA. [ ] +1: Good to go [ ]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.15 as GA

On Jun 19, 2015, at 10:50 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.15 can be found at the usual place: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.15 GA. [ ] +1: Good to go [ ]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.16 as GA

On Jul 10, 2015, at 2:33 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.16 can be found at the usual place: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.16 GA. [ ] +1: Good to go [ ]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.18 as GA

> On Dec 8, 2015, at 1:38 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.18 can be found > at the usual place: > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.18 GA. > > [ ] +1: Good

Branching for 6.1.x tomorrow

Hi all, I’m planning on branching 6.1.x tomorrow afternoon, so please take a look at your Jira’s, and update / move them accordingly. Cheers, — leif

Re: Branching for 6.1.x tomorrow

> On Dec 15, 2015, at 12:02 PM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I’m planning on branching 6.1.x tomorrow afternoon, so please take a look at > your Jira’s, and update / move them accordingly. sorry about the wrong dev@ list :-/. — leif

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.20 as GA

> On Apr 4, 2016, at 1:20 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.20 can be found > at the usual place: > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.20 GA. > > [ ] +1: Good

Re: httpd and letsencrypt

> On Aug 29, 2016, at 5:17 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Jim Jagielski > wrote: > Also, and this is personal, I don't tend to "trust" entities > with non-public membership: > >

Re: how make backend applications aware about tls-offloading

> On Jan 7, 2017, at 3:25 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > > Am 07.01.2017 um 22:53 schrieb Yann Ylavic: >> On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> >>> something like below where "X-TLS-Offloading" is only evaluated from >>>

clang-analyzer?

Howdy, I ran clang-analyzer against the HTTPD master branch, and it found 126 issues. Many of these are benign, but I was curious if the community has any thoughts on this? With another project, I’ve found that keep static code analysis to zero issues can really help finding new, serious