Hello,
I have a question regarding the logic around SSLFIPS on/off. After
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1853197
I think SSLFIPS off will not work as expected.
#ifdef HAVE_FIPS
if (sc->fips) {
if (!FIPS_mode()) {
if (FIPS_mode_set(1)) {
Hi,
from 2.4.48 on, mod_proxy-cache example [1] begins to fail for me.
Unfortunately I can not manage to expose this issue outside
apache-rex framework sofar. With 2.4.46, I can not see this at all.
$ git clone https://github.com/pgajdos/apache-rex.git
$ cd apache-rex
$ ./run-rex mod_proxy-cache
Hi,
how to more easily reproduce: with following configuration file,
located e. g. in /tmp/apache-rex/mod_proxy-cache/httpd.conf:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 01:01:59PM +0200, pgajdos wrote:
> --8<
> ServerName test
>
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 03:06:38PM +0200, pgajdos wrote:
> 8<
> mkdir -p /tmp/apache-rex/mod_proxy-cache/htdocs-backend
> echo 'Backend for reverse' >
> /tmp/apache-rex/mod_proxy-cache/htdocs-bac
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 08:51:56PM +0200, Marion & Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> > One thing I noticed is insufficient version checking of httpd version,
> Well, it is sometimes hard to figure out when a given feature or directive
> has been added. Especially when tests are added a long time afterwar
On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 02:15:07PM +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
> even those distro package maintainers get sick to F'n death of it after
> a while and skip updates.
I do not see any reason I should get distinguished by it. Frequent
version updates are even better for me.
Petr
Hello,
I propose following patch, as PR39730 was fixed recently.
--- t/modules/negotiation.t.orig2019-01-29 07:49:18.495899602 +
+++ t/modules/negotiation.t 2019-01-29 07:52:38.428960368 +
@@ -8,7 +8,11 @@ use Apache::TestUtil;
## mod_negotiation test (see extra.conf.in)
m
Hello,
tested with 2.4.37 and 2.4.38.
4, 8 and 12 subtests of buffer.t are randomly failing for me. I have
already seen to fail zero, one, two or all of them.
When none fails, the test is done in very few seconds (including
initialization of t/TEST).
$r->code of the failing subtest is: 200
$r->
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 09:48:10PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Le 29/01/2019 à 14:59, pgajdos a écrit :
> > 4, 8 and 12 subtests of buffer.t are randomly failing for me. I have
> Hi, there has been some discussion about this new test added in r1841508
>
> See
>
Hello,
please see the proposed patch in the attachement.
Petr
Index: httpd-framework/t/apache/mergeslashes.t
===
--- httpd-framework.orig/t/apache/mergeslashes.t 2019-03-21 08:49:48.086794262 +0100
+++ httpd-framework/t/apache/merge
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 11:15:04AM +0100, pgajdos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I propose following patch, as PR39730 was fixed recently.
What do you think about the patch? Should it be amended somehow?
Thanks!
Petr
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 07:47:14AM -0400, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 5:36 AM pgajdos wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > please see the proposed patch in the attachement.
>
> Thanks Petr, applied in 1855981
Thanks for both!
Petr
Hi!
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 10:32:11PM +0100, Marion & Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>In other word, what is the "semantic" behind the test framework?
> - Testing against regression only? (in this case including Petr's
>patch makes sense to me) - or -
> - Checking that the behavi
13 matches
Mail list logo