Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Monday, August 2, 2004 11:44 AM -0400 Bill Stoddard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These are debug messages so not sure why they are a problem.
+0
The logging code is expensive to call for every request like that as
many times as it does. IMHO, there's no benefit to
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Sunday, August 1, 2004 11:25 AM -0400 Bill Stoddard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Too many changes in one patch. Break this up into multiple consumable
in 15
minute patches and I'll review them.
* modules/experimental/mod_cache.c: Reduce logging in mainline case.
These
Bill Stoddard wrote:
* modules/experimental/mod_cache.c: Reduce logging in mainline case.
These are debug messages so not sure why they are a problem.
While mod_cache is experimental, it may help to have more logging rather
than less. Are the logging functions that much of a performance problem
On Mon, 02 Aug 2004 18:13:09 +0200, Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Stoddard wrote:
* modules/experimental/mod_cache.c: Reduce logging in mainline case.
These are debug messages so not sure why they are a problem.
While mod_cache is experimental, it may help to have more
--On Monday, August 2, 2004 11:44 AM -0400 Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
These are debug messages so not sure why they are a problem.
+0
The logging code is expensive to call for every request like that as many
times as it does. IMHO, there's no benefit to such a verbose log. More
--On Sunday, August 1, 2004 11:25 AM -0400 Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Too many changes in one patch. Break this up into multiple consumable in 15
minute patches and I'll review them.
* modules/experimental/mod_cache.c: Reduce logging in mainline case.
Index:
