Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Greg Marr wrote:
Couldn't the new member be placed at the end of the request rec so
that it's only a minor bump?
Sure - does that work across all compilers ?
Yes.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.
> + *) SECURITY - verification as to wether the nonce returned in the
> + client response is one we issued ourselves by means of a
> + AuthNonce secret exposed as an md5(). See mod_digest documentation
> + for more details. The experimental/mod_auth_digest.c does not
> + have this
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Greg Marr wrote:
> Couldn't the new member be placed at the end of the request rec so
> that it's only a minor bump?
Sure - does that work across all compilers ? Or do some still do some
sort of sorting/packing depending on O level ?
Dw
Couldn't the new member be placed at the end of the request rec so
that it's only a minor bump?
+ *) SECURITY - verification as to wether the nonce returned in the
s/wether/whether/
+ "A random value or the servers IP may be a good choise.\n" },
s/choise/choice/
+/* We need to create a no
