Joe Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is this one any better?
Index: include/util_filter.h
===
[...]
+ * @param ftype The type of filter function, either ::AP_FTYPE_CONTENT
--On Saturday, January 11, 2003 5:50 PM -0500 Joe Schaefer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks to me like his email client munged the patch- spurious
leading spaces, column wrap, etc. Bad Mozilla.
Is this one any better?
Patch committed. Thanks! -- justin
Greg Stein wrote:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 12:41:38PM +1100, Stas Bekman wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
...
As has been mentioned many times before on this list, if a patch isn't
committed or commented on, you have to remind us. There are as many
whys for this requirement as there are httpd
--On Saturday, January 11, 2003 9:13 PM +1100 Stas Bekman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My simple document patch is a great example of something that could
be handled by someone who doesn't have to be an expert in
httpd-2.0. It's expected that a new committer may need to do some
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 12:41:38PM +1100, Stas Bekman wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
...
As has been mentioned many times before on this list, if a patch isn't
committed or commented on, you have to remind us. There are as many
whys for this requirement as there are httpd committers trying to
Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't know how hard it is to decide to commit an obvious API doc
patch. Why does it always have to be reposted several times before it
gets committed?
As has been mentioned many times before on this list, if a patch isn't
committed or commented on, you
