On Dec 19, 2017 11:08, "William A Rowe Jr" wrote:
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> - ./server/util_pcre.c
>
> (likely more)
[]
Others are lifted under license from other parties; these
must retain both the copyright attribution and original license
(e.g. MIT, BSD
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> On Dec 15, 2017, at 11:26 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>>
>> Actually remoteip isn't a showstopper... I find it demotivating and against
>> the spirit of httpd development, but am NOT vetoing it, and was showing an
>> example of proper
> On Dec 15, 2017, at 11:26 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>
> Actually remoteip isn't a showstopper... I find it demotivating and against
> the spirit of httpd development, but am NOT vetoing it, and was showing an
> example of proper form when attribution is desired.
>
> mod_h2 is a showstopp
Actually remoteip isn't a showstopper... I find it demotivating and against
the spirit of httpd development, but am NOT vetoing it, and was showing an
example of proper form when attribution is desired.
mod_h2 is a showstopper. It is missing an ASF copyright statement
altogether.
On Dec 15, 2017
>From what I understand, it should be something like:
/* Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
* contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
* this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
* The ASF licenses this file
On 14 Dec 2017, at 8:43 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> So without diving into why one or another form is more correct,
> the ASF's global license header guidance is absolute.
>
> mod_remoteip is an example of getting it 'right' by many
> definitions of 'right' across the ASF;
>
> /* Licensed to