Re: Pruning working branches (Was: Re: Why?)

2017-10-26 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 3:17 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote: > You could make a dir /branches/attic" and move all candidates there. People > wanting to "resurrect" them can simply move them back. This is not RCS. +1

Re: Pruning working branches (Was: Re: Why?)

2017-10-26 Thread Rainer Jung
Am 26.10.2017 um 10:30 schrieb Yann Ylavic: I like this "attic" idea better, resurrecting something is easier if you can find that it ever existed (w/o diving into svn history, à la "svn delete"). +1

Re: Pruning working branches (Was: Re: Why?)

2017-10-26 Thread Eric Covener
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 4:30 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > I like this "attic" idea better, resurrecting something is easier if > you can find that it ever existed (w/o diving into svn history, à la > "svn delete"). +1

Re: Pruning working branches (Was: Re: Why?)

2017-10-26 Thread Yann Ylavic
I like this "attic" idea better, resurrecting something is easier if you can find that it ever existed (w/o diving into svn history, à la "svn delete"). On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote: > Thanks Greg. The proposed change is purely aestetic.

Re: Pruning working branches (Was: Re: Why?)

2017-10-26 Thread Stefan Eissing
Thanks Greg. The proposed change is purely aestetic. You could make a dir /branches/attic" and move all candidates there. People wanting to "resurrect" them can simply move them back. This is not RCS. > Am 25.10.2017 um 20:21 schrieb Greg Stein : > > To be clear: "delete"

Re: Pruning working branches (Was: Re: Why?)

2017-10-25 Thread Greg Stein
To be clear: "delete" simply means "no longer seen in HEAD". This is version control. The data cannot truly be deleted, so it can always be revived. Or reviewed. On Oct 25, 2017 12:31, "Marion & Christophe JAILLET" < christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr> wrote: > Just to mention that before giving a

Re: Pruning working branches (Was: Re: Why?)

2017-10-25 Thread Jim Jagielski
Are there anything of "value" in any of those branches? If not, prune away! > On Oct 24, 2017, at 9:11 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 3:28 AM, Steffen wrote: >> >> On Tuesday 24/10/2017 at 10:26, Steffen wrote: >> >> Can

Re: Pruning working branches (Was: Re: Why?)

2017-10-25 Thread Rainer Jung
Am 24.10.2017 um 23:05 schrieb William A Rowe Jr: On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 8:11 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 3:28 AM, Steffen wrote: On Tuesday 24/10/2017 at 10:26, Steffen wrote: Can someone clean up the not needed anymore

Re: Pruning working branches (Was: Re: Why?)

2017-10-25 Thread Marion & Christophe JAILLET
+1 Le 24/10/2017 à 23:05, William A Rowe Jr a écrit : On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 8:11 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 3:28 AM, Steffen wrote: On Tuesday 24/10/2017 at 10:26, Steffen wrote: Can someone clean up the not needed

Re: Pruning working branches (Was: Re: Why?)

2017-10-24 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 8:11 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 3:28 AM, Steffen wrote: >> >> On Tuesday 24/10/2017 at 10:26, Steffen wrote: >> >> Can someone clean up the not needed anymore backports/branches >>