At 01:40 PM 6/27/2005, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 01:16 PM 6/27/2005, JimJag wrote:
Shouldn't set_allow_header be static?
My bad, make_header was static, and set_allow_header in my
tree is static as well.
If there are no objections, I would move ahead and commit.
The only thing holding up
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 01:40 PM 6/27/2005, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 01:16 PM 6/27/2005, JimJag wrote:
Shouldn't set_allow_header be static?
My bad, make_header was static, and set_allow_header in my
tree is static as well.
If there are no objections, I would move ahead
Shouldn't set_allow_header be static?
At 01:16 PM 6/27/2005, JimJag wrote:
Shouldn't set_allow_header be static?
ewww. so should have make_allow ...
Wasn't defined in any header, so I don't suppose it's really
breaking ABI to get it right :)
Bill
