Re: Rev 1: [PATCH] 1.3 TraceEnable [on|off|extended]
At 01:40 PM 6/27/2005, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: At 01:16 PM 6/27/2005, JimJag wrote: Shouldn't set_allow_header be static? My bad, make_header was static, and set_allow_header in my tree is static as well. If there are no objections, I would move ahead and commit. The only thing holding up the 2.x flavor is restoring the chunked-pass logic. I've decided on a metadata bucket type and just have to figure out the implementation details. Bill
Re: Rev 1: [PATCH] 1.3 TraceEnable [on|off|extended]
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: At 01:40 PM 6/27/2005, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: At 01:16 PM 6/27/2005, JimJag wrote: Shouldn't set_allow_header be static? My bad, make_header was static, and set_allow_header in my tree is static as well. If there are no objections, I would move ahead and commit. +1 -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ Sith happens - Yoda
Re: Rev 1: [PATCH] 1.3 TraceEnable [on|off|extended]
Shouldn't set_allow_header be static?
Re: Rev 1: [PATCH] 1.3 TraceEnable [on|off|extended]
At 01:16 PM 6/27/2005, JimJag wrote: Shouldn't set_allow_header be static? ewww. so should have make_allow ... Wasn't defined in any header, so I don't suppose it's really breaking ABI to get it right :) Bill
