Re: Trouble in rusttls land?
> Am 11.05.2022 um 13:46 schrieb Joe Orton : > > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 10:50:12PM +0200, Stefan Eissing wrote: >> Will look at it tomorrow. > > Could we cache the crates if building them is the source of > unreliability? It looks like we just have to add a couple of extra > directories to the cache list: > > https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/caching/#rust-cargo-cache > > On the other hand, if the aim is to always build against current > versions of the rust components then maybe you don't want this? For rustls itself, this would be be good. However rustls-ffi is make a static library and I am not sure that this is covered by this feature. > >> >>> Am 10.05.2022 um 15:17 schrieb Ruediger Pluem : >>> >>> The latest build 0f 2.4.x on Travis failed with mod_tls. Ideas? >>> >>> https://app.travis-ci.com/github/apache/httpd/jobs/569587665 >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Rüdiger >> >
Re: Trouble in rusttls land?
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 10:50:12PM +0200, Stefan Eissing wrote: > Will look at it tomorrow. Could we cache the crates if building them is the source of unreliability? It looks like we just have to add a couple of extra directories to the cache list: https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/caching/#rust-cargo-cache On the other hand, if the aim is to always build against current versions of the rust components then maybe you don't want this? > > > Am 10.05.2022 um 15:17 schrieb Ruediger Pluem : > > > > The latest build 0f 2.4.x on Travis failed with mod_tls. Ideas? > > > > https://app.travis-ci.com/github/apache/httpd/jobs/569587665 > > > > Regards > > > > Rüdiger >
Re: Trouble in rusttls land?
Will look at it tomorrow. > Am 10.05.2022 um 15:17 schrieb Ruediger Pluem : > > The latest build 0f 2.4.x on Travis failed with mod_tls. Ideas? > > https://app.travis-ci.com/github/apache/httpd/jobs/569587665 > > Regards > > Rüdiger