Re: async mod_proxy_http

2018-09-13 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 1:59 AM Yann Ylavic wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 5:53 PM Eric Covener wrote: > > > > Forking from the Cool Stuff thread. > > > > Have you noticed that the wstunnell stuff makes the suspended count in > > the MPM grow? There is no API for us to tell the MPM that when

Re: async mod_proxy_http

2018-09-13 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 10:55 AM Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote: > > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > > Von: Yann Ylavic > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. September 2018 10:37 > > An: httpd-dev > > Betreff: Re: async mod_proxy_http > > > >

Re: async mod_proxy_http

2018-09-13 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 8:49 AM Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote: > > I don't like the "misuse" of c->aborted here. I for instance log in > the access log whether connections have been aborted or not and this > approach would mean that all proxied websocket connections would get > marked as

Re: async mod_proxy_http

2018-09-12 Thread Eric Covener
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 7:59 PM Yann Ylavic wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 5:53 PM Eric Covener wrote: > > > > Forking from the Cool Stuff thread. > > > > Have you noticed that the wstunnell stuff makes the suspended count in > > the MPM grow? There is no API for us to tell the MPM that when

Re: async mod_proxy_http

2018-09-12 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 5:53 PM Eric Covener wrote: > > Forking from the Cool Stuff thread. > > Have you noticed that the wstunnell stuff makes the suspended count in > the MPM grow? There is no API for us to tell the MPM that when we get > the socket-activity callback that we are "resuming"