On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 6:27 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 5:51 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
>
>> I tweaked it to
>> run for 2.5 only anyway.
>
> Jim reported three failures and you disabled one only, do the others
> work for you? Hmm, it seems
OK, this does not look like a regression, but instead a test not expected
to PASS under 2.4 (yet).
So I am thinking that a T of 2.4.29 is now a Go.
I will likely T later on today, say ~3pm eastern.
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 07:57:51AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> HEAD of 2.4 now has errors with the test framework:
>
> t/apache/expr_string.t .. 1/32 # Failed test 27 in
> t/apache/expr_string.t at line 73 fail #10
> # Failed test 28 in t/apache/expr_string.t at line 83 fail #9
> #
verbose:
# writing file:
/Users/jim/src/asf/code/stable/httpd-test/framework/t/htdocs/apache/expr/.htaccess
Error log should not have 'Internal evaluation error' or 'flex scanner jammed'
entries, found 1:
flex scanner jammed
not ok 27
Expected return code 200, got 500 for '%{tolower:"IDENT"}'