Re: friends of mod_proxy

2022-10-11 Thread Jim Jagielski
+1 > On Oct 11, 2022, at 3:47 AM, Stefan Eissing via dev > wrote: > > > >> Am 10.10.2022 um 20:39 schrieb Ruediger Pluem : >> >> >> >> On 10/10/22 6:35 PM, Eric Covener wrote: >>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 11:55 AM Yann Ylavic wrote: On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 9:14 PM Ruediger Pluem

Re: friends of mod_proxy

2022-10-11 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 9:47 AM Stefan Eissing via dev wrote: > > > Am 10.10.2022 um 20:39 schrieb Ruediger Pluem : > > > > On 10/10/22 6:35 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 11:55 AM Yann Ylavic wrote: > >>> > >>> How about a patch like the attached one now, which disables

Re: friends of mod_proxy

2022-10-11 Thread Stefan Eissing via dev
> Am 10.10.2022 um 20:39 schrieb Ruediger Pluem : > > > > On 10/10/22 6:35 PM, Eric Covener wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 11:55 AM Yann Ylavic wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 9:14 PM Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 10/7/22 7:11 PM, Stefan Eissing via dev wrote: > >

Re: friends of mod_proxy

2022-10-10 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 10/10/22 6:35 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 11:55 AM Yann Ylavic wrote: >> >> On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 9:14 PM Ruediger Pluem wrote: >>> >>> On 10/7/22 7:11 PM, Stefan Eissing via dev wrote: > Am 07.10.2022 um 18:45 schrieb Yann Ylavic : >

Re: friends of mod_proxy

2022-10-10 Thread Eric Covener
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 11:55 AM Yann Ylavic wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 9:14 PM Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > > > On 10/7/22 7:11 PM, Stefan Eissing via dev wrote: > > > > > > > > >> Am 07.10.2022 um 18:45 schrieb Yann Ylavic : > > >> > > > > > > Thanks, Yann, for the detailed explanation on

Re: friends of mod_proxy

2022-10-10 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 9:14 PM Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > On 10/7/22 7:11 PM, Stefan Eissing via dev wrote: > > > > > >> Am 07.10.2022 um 18:45 schrieb Yann Ylavic : > >> > > > > Thanks, Yann, for the detailed explanation on how this works and that the > > default does the right thing. > > +1. I

Re: friends of mod_proxy

2022-10-09 Thread Jim Jagielski
Yeah... The logic in not re-using a worker is that the pattern matching aspect made it both difficult and somewhat inconsistent due to the dynamic nature of the situation, hence the use of the "default" worker for these. We now have the functionality to handle this, but it is still a

Re: friends of mod_proxy

2022-10-07 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 10/7/22 7:11 PM, Stefan Eissing via dev wrote: > > >> Am 07.10.2022 um 18:45 schrieb Yann Ylavic : >> > > Thanks, Yann, for the detailed explanation on how this works and that the > default does the right thing. +1. I missed the default of not reusing the connection in these cases but

Re: friends of mod_proxy

2022-10-07 Thread Stefan Eissing via dev
> Am 07.10.2022 um 18:45 schrieb Yann Ylavic : > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 5:32 PM Eric Covener wrote: >> >> On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 10:21 AM Stefan Eissing via dev >> wrote: >>> >>> Friends of mod_proxy, I have a question: >>> >>> In someone

Re: friends of mod_proxy

2022-10-07 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 5:32 PM Eric Covener wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 10:21 AM Stefan Eissing via dev > wrote: > > > > Friends of mod_proxy, I have a question: > > > > In someone reported wrong > > connection reuse for a config like: > > > >

Re: friends of mod_proxy

2022-10-06 Thread Eric Covener
On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 10:21 AM Stefan Eissing via dev wrote: > > Friends of mod_proxy, I have a question: > > In someone reported wrong > connection reuse for a config like: > > ProxyPassMatch ^/(prod|dev)/([-a-z0-9]+)/(.*)$ h2://$2.internal/$1/$2/$3

Re: friends of mod_proxy

2022-10-06 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 10/6/22 4:20 PM, Stefan Eissing via dev wrote: > Friends of mod_proxy, I have a question: > > In someone reported wrong > connection reuse for a config like: > > ProxyPassMatch ^/(prod|dev)/([-a-z0-9]+)/(.*)$ h2://$2.internal/$1/$2/$3 >