On Mon, 31 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we should also put in a directive to only compress when system load is
below a certain level. (but we would need a apr_get_system_load()
function first .. any volunteers? )
If you go down this route watch out for what's called 'back-flash'.
Stephen Pierzchala wrote:
All:
A question for discussion: should a lower bound be set in mod_deflate?
I just ran a test using the Linux Documentation Project files and found
that some of the files in the test group were quite small, less that 100
bytes. When mod_deflate tackled these files, I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Stephen Pierzchala wrote:
All:
A question for discussion: should a lower bound be set in mod_deflate?
I just ran a test using the Linux Documentation Project files and found
that some of the files in the test group were quite small, less that 100
bytes. When
FYI: There was a serious brain fart (mine) in the
previous message...
I said...
2. If there's no EOS in the brigade yet you have to assume
more is coming so now it's nut-crackin' time. If the 'minimum
file size' is less than the amount of data already in the first
brigade showing up then
