Re: reset in proxy_balancer_method

2024-02-15 Thread jean-frederic clere
On 2/15/24 13:04, Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 2/15/24 9:28 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: On 2/14/24 20:54, Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 2/14/24 3:45 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote: On 2/14/24 08:19, Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 2/9/24 11:59 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: Hi, I have noted to the

Re: reset in proxy_balancer_method

2024-02-15 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 2/15/24 9:28 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: > On 2/14/24 20:54, Ruediger Pluem wrote: >> >> >> On 2/14/24 3:45 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote: >>> On 2/14/24 08:19, Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 2/9/24 11:59 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: > Hi, > > I have noted to the

Re: reset in proxy_balancer_method

2024-02-15 Thread jean-frederic clere
On 2/14/24 20:54, Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 2/14/24 3:45 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote: On 2/14/24 08:19, Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 2/9/24 11:59 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: Hi, I have noted to the reset() clean up too much in the balancers: mod_lbmethod_bybusyness.c for example does:

Re: reset in proxy_balancer_method

2024-02-14 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 2/14/24 3:45 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote: > On 2/14/24 08:19, Ruediger Pluem wrote: >> >> >> On 2/9/24 11:59 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have noted to the reset() clean up too much in the balancers: >>> mod_lbmethod_bybusyness.c for example does: >>> +++ >>> for

Re: reset in proxy_balancer_method

2024-02-14 Thread jean-frederic clere
On 2/14/24 08:19, Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 2/9/24 11:59 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: Hi, I have noted to the reset() clean up too much in the balancers: mod_lbmethod_bybusyness.c for example does: +++     for (i = 0; i < balancer->workers->nelts; i++, worker++) {    

Re: reset in proxy_balancer_method

2024-02-13 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 2/9/24 11:59 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: > Hi, > > I have noted to the reset() clean up too much in the balancers: > mod_lbmethod_bybusyness.c for example does: > +++ >     for (i = 0; i < balancer->workers->nelts; i++, worker++) { >     (*worker)->s->lbstatus = 0; >