On Wed, Oct 2, 2024 at 12:06 PM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/2/24 4:42 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> > Author: covener
> > Date: Wed Oct 2 14:42:25 2024
> > New Revision: 1921086
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1921086&view=rev
> > Log:
> > pause on rewrite/proxy thing
> >
> > Modified:
> > httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
> >
> > Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
> > URL:
> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS?rev=1921086&r1=1921085&r2=1921086&view=diff
> > ==
> > --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original)
> > +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Wed Oct 2 14:42:25 2024
>
> > @@ -230,6 +218,19 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
> > 2.4.x patch: svn merge -c 1920597 -c 1921076 ^/httpd/httpd/trunk .
> > +1: jorton,
> >
> > + *) mod_rewrite, mod_proxy: mod_proxy to cononicalize rewritten [P] URLs,
> > + including "unix:" ones. PR 69235, PR 69260, PR 56264
> > + Trunk version of patch:
> > +https://svn.apache.org/r1838684
> > +https://svn.apache.org/r1920570
> > +https://svn.apache.org/r1920571
> > +https://svn.apache.org/r1920572
> > + Backport version for 2.4.x of patch:
> > +
> > https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/apache/httpd/pull/484.diff
> > + Can be applied via apply_backport_pr.sh 484
> > + +1: rpluem, ylavic
> > + covener: what about remaining parts of
> > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69203 ? 69260 was marked dup
> > of 69203.
>
> I don't see where 69203 is marked as a duplicate as 69260. 69260 is a
> duplicate of 69235.
My mistake, thanks! Will come back to it and update.
