Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg Rust 0.6.0 RC1

[Kevin Liu]

Thanks for verifying and voting, Steven. We now have 3 binding votes 🚀

Kurtis has opened a PR to improve the docs around docker and podman
https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/pull/1553
I'll also try to reproduce the issue with podman locally.

Best,
Kevin Liu

On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 10:59 AM Steven Wu  wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Verified checksum, signature. Ran build and unit test  on Mac OS (arm64).
>
> I wouldn't run the full test related to my container env setup. Tried
> podman (instead of docker desktop) per doc. Got the same failures.
>
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 10:21 AM Kevin Liu  wrote:
>
>> Thanks for verifying the release, Kurtis!
>>
>> > Question, I noticed a naming difference between Github link and
>> dist.apache.org link. Is there any concern this will affect the release?
>>
>> Yes this is intentional. The Apache link is under the `dev/` folder,
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-rust-0.6.0-rc1/
>> This directory is for release candidates. When the vote passes, the release
>> candidate artifacts are moved to the `release/` folder,
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/iceberg/
>> We issue a `mv` command to move the artifacts. The artifact name is
>> intentionally without the `rc` suffix so that we don't need to rename the
>> artifacts before running the `mv` command.
>>
>> Best,
>> Kevin Liu
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 7:13 AM Kurtis Wright 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> [x] Download links are valid.
>>> [x] Checksums and signatures.
>>> [x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
>>> [x] No unexpected binary files
>>> [x] Can compile from source
>>>
>>> Ran `make build && make test` from both dist.apache.org and Github
>>> source links:
>>>  - on Mac with M1 (arm64) CPU using Orbstack for integration tests,
>>> result = success.
>>>  - on Linux with x86_64 CPU using Podman for integration tests,
>>> encountered errors not related to release sent PR. With PR result = success.
>>>
>>> Question, I noticed a naming difference between Github link and
>>> dist.apache.org link. Is there any concern this will affect the release?
>>>
>>> Apache = apache-iceberg-rust-0.6.0-src.tar.gz
>>> Github = iceberg-rust-0.6.0-rc.1.tar.gz
>>>
>>> Context: First time helping verify a release so the above question is
>>> very naive to what is normal.
>>>
>>> On Jul 25, 2025, at 09:39, Kevin Liu  wrote:
>>>
>>> Bump! We need just one more binding vote!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 8:18 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
 +1 (binding)

 Verified checksums/signatures/LICENSE/NOTICE. Ran make build/test on
 Linux x86-64

 Thanks,

 Amogh Jahagirdar

 On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 3:03 AM Renjie Liu 
 wrote:

> Hi, guys:
>
> We still need at least 2 binding votes to pass the release, so please
> help to verify it!
>
> We have achieved some exciting progress, like new tx api, reading with
> deletions, and hopes this release will help more user to adopt it!
>
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 11:44 AM Renjie Liu 
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> [x] Download links are valid. (there's a typo with "Git tag for the
>> release", I've added a fix)
>> [x] Checksums and signatures.
>> [x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
>> [x] No unexpected binary files
>> [] All source files have ASF headers (This is checked in ci)
>> [x] Can compile from source
>>
>> I ran `make build && make test` on macbook with m4 chip.
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 10:25 PM NOTME ZE 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> [x] Download links are valid.
>>> [x] Checksums and signatures.
>>> [x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
>>> [x] No unexpected binary files
>>> [x] All source files have ASF headers
>>> [x] Can compile from source
>>>
>>> Ran `./scripts/verify.py`
>>> Built and tested, `make build && make test`
>>>
>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré  于2025年7月22日周二 20:20写道：
>>>
 +1 (non binding)

 I checked:
 - source distribution
 -- signature and checksum are good
 -- LICENSE and NOTICE are good
 -- ASF header present in expected files (tsv files don't have it but
 it's normal as tsv doesn't really support comment)
 -- No binary file found in the source distribution

 Thanks !

 Regards
 JB

 On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 5:50 AM Xuanwo  wrote:
 >
 > Hello, Apache Iceberg Rust Community,
 >
 > This is a call for a vote to release Apache Iceberg rust version
 v0.6.0.
 >
 > The tag to be voted on is 0.6.0-rc.1.
 >
 > The release candidate:
 >
 >
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-rust-0.6.0-rc1/
 >
 > Keys to verify the release candidate:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg Rust 0.6.0 RC1

[Steven Wu]

+1 (binding)

Verified checksum, signature. Ran build and unit test  on Mac OS (arm64).

I wouldn't run the full test related to my container env setup. Tried
podman (instead of docker desktop) per doc. Got the same failures.

On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 10:21 AM Kevin Liu  wrote:

> Thanks for verifying the release, Kurtis!
>
> > Question, I noticed a naming difference between Github link and
> dist.apache.org link. Is there any concern this will affect the release?
>
> Yes this is intentional. The Apache link is under the `dev/` folder,
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-rust-0.6.0-rc1/
> This directory is for release candidates. When the vote passes, the release
> candidate artifacts are moved to the `release/` folder,
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/iceberg/
> We issue a `mv` command to move the artifacts. The artifact name is
> intentionally without the `rc` suffix so that we don't need to rename the
> artifacts before running the `mv` command.
>
> Best,
> Kevin Liu
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 7:13 AM Kurtis Wright 
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> [x] Download links are valid.
>> [x] Checksums and signatures.
>> [x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
>> [x] No unexpected binary files
>> [x] Can compile from source
>>
>> Ran `make build && make test` from both dist.apache.org and Github
>> source links:
>>  - on Mac with M1 (arm64) CPU using Orbstack for integration tests,
>> result = success.
>>  - on Linux with x86_64 CPU using Podman for integration tests,
>> encountered errors not related to release sent PR. With PR result = success.
>>
>> Question, I noticed a naming difference between Github link and
>> dist.apache.org link. Is there any concern this will affect the release?
>>
>> Apache = apache-iceberg-rust-0.6.0-src.tar.gz
>> Github = iceberg-rust-0.6.0-rc.1.tar.gz
>>
>> Context: First time helping verify a release so the above question is
>> very naive to what is normal.
>>
>> On Jul 25, 2025, at 09:39, Kevin Liu  wrote:
>>
>> Bump! We need just one more binding vote!
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 8:18 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> Verified checksums/signatures/LICENSE/NOTICE. Ran make build/test on
>>> Linux x86-64
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Amogh Jahagirdar
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 3:03 AM Renjie Liu 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Hi, guys:

 We still need at least 2 binding votes to pass the release, so please
 help to verify it!

 We have achieved some exciting progress, like new tx api, reading with
 deletions, and hopes this release will help more user to adopt it!

 On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 11:44 AM Renjie Liu 
 wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> [x] Download links are valid. (there's a typo with "Git tag for the
> release", I've added a fix)
> [x] Checksums and signatures.
> [x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
> [x] No unexpected binary files
> [] All source files have ASF headers (This is checked in ci)
> [x] Can compile from source
>
> I ran `make build && make test` on macbook with m4 chip.
>
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 10:25 PM NOTME ZE 
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> [x] Download links are valid.
>> [x] Checksums and signatures.
>> [x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
>> [x] No unexpected binary files
>> [x] All source files have ASF headers
>> [x] Can compile from source
>>
>> Ran `./scripts/verify.py`
>> Built and tested, `make build && make test`
>>
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré  于2025年7月22日周二 20:20写道：
>>
>>> +1 (non binding)
>>>
>>> I checked:
>>> - source distribution
>>> -- signature and checksum are good
>>> -- LICENSE and NOTICE are good
>>> -- ASF header present in expected files (tsv files don't have it but
>>> it's normal as tsv doesn't really support comment)
>>> -- No binary file found in the source distribution
>>>
>>> Thanks !
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 5:50 AM Xuanwo  wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hello, Apache Iceberg Rust Community,
>>> >
>>> > This is a call for a vote to release Apache Iceberg rust version
>>> v0.6.0.
>>> >
>>> > The tag to be voted on is 0.6.0-rc.1.
>>> >
>>> > The release candidate:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-rust-0.6.0-rc1/
>>> >
>>> > Keys to verify the release candidate:
>>> >
>>> > https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS
>>> >
>>> > I'm using my new key to sign this release, so it might need
>>> sometime to update in the CDN.
>>> >
>>> > Git tag for the release:
>>> >
>>> > https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/releases/tag/0.6.0-rc.1
>>> >
>>> > Please download, verify, and test.
>>> >
>>> > The VOTE will be open for at least 72 hours and until the necessary
>>> > number of vote

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg Rust 0.6.0 RC1

[Kevin Liu]

Thanks for verifying the release, Kurtis!

> Question, I noticed a naming difference between Github link and
dist.apache.org link. Is there any concern this will affect the release?

Yes this is intentional. The Apache link is under the `dev/` folder,
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-rust-0.6.0-rc1/
This directory is for release candidates. When the vote passes, the release
candidate artifacts are moved to the `release/` folder,
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/iceberg/
We issue a `mv` command to move the artifacts. The artifact name is
intentionally without the `rc` suffix so that we don't need to rename the
artifacts before running the `mv` command.

Best,
Kevin Liu



On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 7:13 AM Kurtis Wright 
wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> [x] Download links are valid.
> [x] Checksums and signatures.
> [x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
> [x] No unexpected binary files
> [x] Can compile from source
>
> Ran `make build && make test` from both dist.apache.org and Github source
> links:
>  - on Mac with M1 (arm64) CPU using Orbstack for integration tests,
> result = success.
>  - on Linux with x86_64 CPU using Podman for integration tests,
> encountered errors not related to release sent PR. With PR result = success.
>
> Question, I noticed a naming difference between Github link and
> dist.apache.org link. Is there any concern this will affect the release?
>
> Apache = apache-iceberg-rust-0.6.0-src.tar.gz
> Github = iceberg-rust-0.6.0-rc.1.tar.gz
>
> Context: First time helping verify a release so the above question is very
> naive to what is normal.
>
> On Jul 25, 2025, at 09:39, Kevin Liu  wrote:
>
> Bump! We need just one more binding vote!
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 8:18 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Verified checksums/signatures/LICENSE/NOTICE. Ran make build/test on
>> Linux x86-64
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Amogh Jahagirdar
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 3:03 AM Renjie Liu 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, guys:
>>>
>>> We still need at least 2 binding votes to pass the release, so please
>>> help to verify it!
>>>
>>> We have achieved some exciting progress, like new tx api, reading with
>>> deletions, and hopes this release will help more user to adopt it!
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 11:44 AM Renjie Liu 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 +1 (binding)

 [x] Download links are valid. (there's a typo with "Git tag for the
 release", I've added a fix)
 [x] Checksums and signatures.
 [x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
 [x] No unexpected binary files
 [] All source files have ASF headers (This is checked in ci)
 [x] Can compile from source

 I ran `make build && make test` on macbook with m4 chip.

 On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 10:25 PM NOTME ZE 
 wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> [x] Download links are valid.
> [x] Checksums and signatures.
> [x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
> [x] No unexpected binary files
> [x] All source files have ASF headers
> [x] Can compile from source
>
> Ran `./scripts/verify.py`
> Built and tested, `make build && make test`
>
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré  于2025年7月22日周二 20:20写道：
>
>> +1 (non binding)
>>
>> I checked:
>> - source distribution
>> -- signature and checksum are good
>> -- LICENSE and NOTICE are good
>> -- ASF header present in expected files (tsv files don't have it but
>> it's normal as tsv doesn't really support comment)
>> -- No binary file found in the source distribution
>>
>> Thanks !
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 5:50 AM Xuanwo  wrote:
>> >
>> > Hello, Apache Iceberg Rust Community,
>> >
>> > This is a call for a vote to release Apache Iceberg rust version
>> v0.6.0.
>> >
>> > The tag to be voted on is 0.6.0-rc.1.
>> >
>> > The release candidate:
>> >
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-rust-0.6.0-rc1/
>> >
>> > Keys to verify the release candidate:
>> >
>> > https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS
>> >
>> > I'm using my new key to sign this release, so it might need
>> sometime to update in the CDN.
>> >
>> > Git tag for the release:
>> >
>> > https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/releases/tag/0.6.0-rc.1
>> >
>> > Please download, verify, and test.
>> >
>> > The VOTE will be open for at least 72 hours and until the necessary
>> > number of votes are reached.
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 approve
>> > [ ] +0 no opinion
>> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>> >
>> > To learn more about Apache Iceberg, please see
>> https://rust.iceberg.apache.org/
>> >
>> > Checklist for reference:
>> >
>> > [ ] Download links are valid.
>> > [ ] Checksums and signatures.
>> > [ ] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
>> > [ ] No unexpected binary files
>> > [ ] A

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg Rust 0.6.0 RC1

[Alex Stephen]

+1 (non-binding)

[x] Download links are valid.
[x] Checksums and signatures.
[x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
[x] No unexpected binary files
[x] Can compile from source

Ran `make build && make test` on Mac (arm64) with Colima for integration
tests.

On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 7:12 AM Kurtis Wright 
wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> [x] Download links are valid.
> [x] Checksums and signatures.
> [x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
> [x] No unexpected binary files
> [x] Can compile from source
>
> Ran `make build && make test` from both dist.apache.org and Github source
> links:
>  - on Mac with M1 (arm64) CPU using Orbstack for integration tests,
> result = success.
>  - on Linux with x86_64 CPU using Podman for integration tests,
> encountered errors not related to release sent PR. With PR result = success.
>
> Question, I noticed a naming difference between Github link and
> dist.apache.org link. Is there any concern this will affect the release?
>
> Apache = apache-iceberg-rust-0.6.0-src.tar.gz
> Github = iceberg-rust-0.6.0-rc.1.tar.gz
>
> Context: First time helping verify a release so the above question is very
> naive to what is normal.
>
> On Jul 25, 2025, at 09:39, Kevin Liu  wrote:
>
> Bump! We need just one more binding vote!
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 8:18 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Verified checksums/signatures/LICENSE/NOTICE. Ran make build/test on
>> Linux x86-64
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Amogh Jahagirdar
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 3:03 AM Renjie Liu 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, guys:
>>>
>>> We still need at least 2 binding votes to pass the release, so please
>>> help to verify it!
>>>
>>> We have achieved some exciting progress, like new tx api, reading with
>>> deletions, and hopes this release will help more user to adopt it!
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 11:44 AM Renjie Liu 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 +1 (binding)

 [x] Download links are valid. (there's a typo with "Git tag for the
 release", I've added a fix)
 [x] Checksums and signatures.
 [x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
 [x] No unexpected binary files
 [] All source files have ASF headers (This is checked in ci)
 [x] Can compile from source

 I ran `make build && make test` on macbook with m4 chip.

 On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 10:25 PM NOTME ZE 
 wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> [x] Download links are valid.
> [x] Checksums and signatures.
> [x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
> [x] No unexpected binary files
> [x] All source files have ASF headers
> [x] Can compile from source
>
> Ran `./scripts/verify.py`
> Built and tested, `make build && make test`
>
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré  于2025年7月22日周二 20:20写道：
>
>> +1 (non binding)
>>
>> I checked:
>> - source distribution
>> -- signature and checksum are good
>> -- LICENSE and NOTICE are good
>> -- ASF header present in expected files (tsv files don't have it but
>> it's normal as tsv doesn't really support comment)
>> -- No binary file found in the source distribution
>>
>> Thanks !
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 5:50 AM Xuanwo  wrote:
>> >
>> > Hello, Apache Iceberg Rust Community,
>> >
>> > This is a call for a vote to release Apache Iceberg rust version
>> v0.6.0.
>> >
>> > The tag to be voted on is 0.6.0-rc.1.
>> >
>> > The release candidate:
>> >
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-rust-0.6.0-rc1/
>> >
>> > Keys to verify the release candidate:
>> >
>> > https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS
>> >
>> > I'm using my new key to sign this release, so it might need
>> sometime to update in the CDN.
>> >
>> > Git tag for the release:
>> >
>> > https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/releases/tag/0.6.0-rc.1
>> >
>> > Please download, verify, and test.
>> >
>> > The VOTE will be open for at least 72 hours and until the necessary
>> > number of votes are reached.
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 approve
>> > [ ] +0 no opinion
>> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>> >
>> > To learn more about Apache Iceberg, please see
>> https://rust.iceberg.apache.org/
>> >
>> > Checklist for reference:
>> >
>> > [ ] Download links are valid.
>> > [ ] Checksums and signatures.
>> > [ ] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
>> > [ ] No unexpected binary files
>> > [ ] All source files have ASF headers
>> > [ ] Can compile from source
>> >
>> > More details please refer to
>> https://rust.iceberg.apache.org/release.html#how-to-verify-a-release.
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> > Xuanwo
>> >
>> > https://xuanwo.io/
>>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg Rust 0.6.0 RC1

[Kurtis Wright]

+1 (non-binding)

[x] Download links are valid.
[x] Checksums and signatures.
[x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
[x] No unexpected binary files
[x] Can compile from source

Ran `make build && make test` from both dist.apache.org and Github source links:
 - on Mac with M1 (arm64) CPU using Orbstack for integration tests, result = 
success.
 - on Linux with x86_64 CPU using Podman for integration tests, encountered 
errors not related to release sent PR. With PR result = success.

Question, I noticed a naming difference between Github link and dist.apache.org 
link. Is there any concern this will affect the release?

Apache = apache-iceberg-rust-0.6.0-src.tar.gz
Github = iceberg-rust-0.6.0-rc.1.tar.gz

Context: First time helping verify a release so the above question is very 
naive to what is normal.

> On Jul 25, 2025, at 09:39, Kevin Liu  wrote:
> 
> Bump! We need just one more binding vote!
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 8:18 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com 
> > wrote:
>> +1 (binding)
>> 
>> Verified checksums/signatures/LICENSE/NOTICE. Ran make build/test on Linux 
>> x86-64
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Amogh Jahagirdar
>> 
>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 3:03 AM Renjie Liu > > wrote:
>>> Hi, guys:
>>> 
>>> We still need at least 2 binding votes to pass the release, so please help 
>>> to verify it!
>>> 
>>> We have achieved some exciting progress, like new tx api, reading with 
>>> deletions, and hopes this release will help more user to adopt it!
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 11:44 AM Renjie Liu >> > wrote:
 +1 (binding)
 
 [x] Download links are valid. (there's a typo with "Git tag for the 
 release", I've added a fix)
 [x] Checksums and signatures.
 [x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
 [x] No unexpected binary files
 [] All source files have ASF headers (This is checked in ci)
 [x] Can compile from source
 
 I ran `make build && make test` on macbook with m4 chip.
 
 On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 10:25 PM NOTME ZE >>> > wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
> 
> [x] Download links are valid.
> [x] Checksums and signatures.
> [x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
> [x] No unexpected binary files
> [x] All source files have ASF headers
> [x] Can compile from source
> 
> Ran `./scripts/verify.py`
> Built and tested, `make build && make test`
> 
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> 
> 于2025年7月22日周二 20:20写道：
>> +1 (non binding)
>> 
>> I checked:
>> - source distribution
>> -- signature and checksum are good
>> -- LICENSE and NOTICE are good
>> -- ASF header present in expected files (tsv files don't have it but
>> it's normal as tsv doesn't really support comment)
>> -- No binary file found in the source distribution
>> 
>> Thanks !
>> 
>> Regards
>> JB
>> 
>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 5:50 AM Xuanwo > > wrote:
>> >
>> > Hello, Apache Iceberg Rust Community,
>> >
>> > This is a call for a vote to release Apache Iceberg rust version 
>> > v0.6.0.
>> >
>> > The tag to be voted on is 0.6.0-rc.1.
>> >
>> > The release candidate:
>> >
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-rust-0.6.0-rc1/
>> >
>> > Keys to verify the release candidate:
>> >
>> > https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS
>> >
>> > I'm using my new key to sign this release, so it might need sometime 
>> > to update in the CDN.
>> >
>> > Git tag for the release:
>> >
>> > https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/releases/tag/0.6.0-rc.1
>> >
>> > Please download, verify, and test.
>> >
>> > The VOTE will be open for at least 72 hours and until the necessary
>> > number of votes are reached.
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 approve
>> > [ ] +0 no opinion
>> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>> >
>> > To learn more about Apache Iceberg, please see 
>> > https://rust.iceberg.apache.org/
>> >
>> > Checklist for reference:
>> >
>> > [ ] Download links are valid.
>> > [ ] Checksums and signatures.
>> > [ ] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
>> > [ ] No unexpected binary files
>> > [ ] All source files have ASF headers
>> > [ ] Can compile from source
>> >
>> > More details please refer to 
>> > https://rust.iceberg.apache.org/release.html#how-to-verify-a-release.
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> > Xuanwo
>> >
>> > https://xuanwo.io/

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg Rust 0.6.0 RC1

[Kevin Liu]

Bump! We need just one more binding vote!



On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 8:18 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Verified checksums/signatures/LICENSE/NOTICE. Ran make build/test on Linux
> x86-64
>
> Thanks,
>
> Amogh Jahagirdar
>
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 3:03 AM Renjie Liu 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi, guys:
>>
>> We still need at least 2 binding votes to pass the release, so please
>> help to verify it!
>>
>> We have achieved some exciting progress, like new tx api, reading with
>> deletions, and hopes this release will help more user to adopt it!
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 11:44 AM Renjie Liu 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> [x] Download links are valid. (there's a typo with "Git tag for the
>>> release", I've added a fix)
>>> [x] Checksums and signatures.
>>> [x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
>>> [x] No unexpected binary files
>>> [] All source files have ASF headers (This is checked in ci)
>>> [x] Can compile from source
>>>
>>> I ran `make build && make test` on macbook with m4 chip.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 10:25 PM NOTME ZE  wrote:
>>>
 +1 (non-binding)

 [x] Download links are valid.
 [x] Checksums and signatures.
 [x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
 [x] No unexpected binary files
 [x] All source files have ASF headers
 [x] Can compile from source

 Ran `./scripts/verify.py`
 Built and tested, `make build && make test`

 Jean-Baptiste Onofré  于2025年7月22日周二 20:20写道：

> +1 (non binding)
>
> I checked:
> - source distribution
> -- signature and checksum are good
> -- LICENSE and NOTICE are good
> -- ASF header present in expected files (tsv files don't have it but
> it's normal as tsv doesn't really support comment)
> -- No binary file found in the source distribution
>
> Thanks !
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 5:50 AM Xuanwo  wrote:
> >
> > Hello, Apache Iceberg Rust Community,
> >
> > This is a call for a vote to release Apache Iceberg rust version
> v0.6.0.
> >
> > The tag to be voted on is 0.6.0-rc.1.
> >
> > The release candidate:
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-rust-0.6.0-rc1/
> >
> > Keys to verify the release candidate:
> >
> > https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS
> >
> > I'm using my new key to sign this release, so it might need sometime
> to update in the CDN.
> >
> > Git tag for the release:
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/releases/tag/0.6.0-rc.1
> >
> > Please download, verify, and test.
> >
> > The VOTE will be open for at least 72 hours and until the necessary
> > number of votes are reached.
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >
> > To learn more about Apache Iceberg, please see
> https://rust.iceberg.apache.org/
> >
> > Checklist for reference:
> >
> > [ ] Download links are valid.
> > [ ] Checksums and signatures.
> > [ ] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
> > [ ] No unexpected binary files
> > [ ] All source files have ASF headers
> > [ ] Can compile from source
> >
> > More details please refer to
> https://rust.iceberg.apache.org/release.html#how-to-verify-a-release.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Xuanwo
> >
> > https://xuanwo.io/
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg Rust 0.6.0 RC1

[Amogh Jahagirdar]

+1 (binding)

Verified checksums/signatures/LICENSE/NOTICE. Ran make build/test on Linux
x86-64

Thanks,

Amogh Jahagirdar

On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 3:03 AM Renjie Liu  wrote:

> Hi, guys:
>
> We still need at least 2 binding votes to pass the release, so please help
> to verify it!
>
> We have achieved some exciting progress, like new tx api, reading with
> deletions, and hopes this release will help more user to adopt it!
>
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 11:44 AM Renjie Liu 
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> [x] Download links are valid. (there's a typo with "Git tag for the
>> release", I've added a fix)
>> [x] Checksums and signatures.
>> [x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
>> [x] No unexpected binary files
>> [] All source files have ASF headers (This is checked in ci)
>> [x] Can compile from source
>>
>> I ran `make build && make test` on macbook with m4 chip.
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 10:25 PM NOTME ZE  wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> [x] Download links are valid.
>>> [x] Checksums and signatures.
>>> [x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
>>> [x] No unexpected binary files
>>> [x] All source files have ASF headers
>>> [x] Can compile from source
>>>
>>> Ran `./scripts/verify.py`
>>> Built and tested, `make build && make test`
>>>
>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré  于2025年7月22日周二 20:20写道：
>>>
 +1 (non binding)

 I checked:
 - source distribution
 -- signature and checksum are good
 -- LICENSE and NOTICE are good
 -- ASF header present in expected files (tsv files don't have it but
 it's normal as tsv doesn't really support comment)
 -- No binary file found in the source distribution

 Thanks !

 Regards
 JB

 On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 5:50 AM Xuanwo  wrote:
 >
 > Hello, Apache Iceberg Rust Community,
 >
 > This is a call for a vote to release Apache Iceberg rust version
 v0.6.0.
 >
 > The tag to be voted on is 0.6.0-rc.1.
 >
 > The release candidate:
 >
 >
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-rust-0.6.0-rc1/
 >
 > Keys to verify the release candidate:
 >
 > https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS
 >
 > I'm using my new key to sign this release, so it might need sometime
 to update in the CDN.
 >
 > Git tag for the release:
 >
 > https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/releases/tag/0.6.0-rc.1
 >
 > Please download, verify, and test.
 >
 > The VOTE will be open for at least 72 hours and until the necessary
 > number of votes are reached.
 >
 > [ ] +1 approve
 > [ ] +0 no opinion
 > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
 >
 > To learn more about Apache Iceberg, please see
 https://rust.iceberg.apache.org/
 >
 > Checklist for reference:
 >
 > [ ] Download links are valid.
 > [ ] Checksums and signatures.
 > [ ] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
 > [ ] No unexpected binary files
 > [ ] All source files have ASF headers
 > [ ] Can compile from source
 >
 > More details please refer to
 https://rust.iceberg.apache.org/release.html#how-to-verify-a-release.
 >
 > Thanks
 >
 > Xuanwo
 >
 > https://xuanwo.io/

>>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg Rust 0.6.0 RC1

[Renjie Liu]

Hi, guys:

We still need at least 2 binding votes to pass the release, so please help
to verify it!

We have achieved some exciting progress, like new tx api, reading with
deletions, and hopes this release will help more user to adopt it!

On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 11:44 AM Renjie Liu  wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> [x] Download links are valid. (there's a typo with "Git tag for the
> release", I've added a fix)
> [x] Checksums and signatures.
> [x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
> [x] No unexpected binary files
> [] All source files have ASF headers (This is checked in ci)
> [x] Can compile from source
>
> I ran `make build && make test` on macbook with m4 chip.
>
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 10:25 PM NOTME ZE  wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> [x] Download links are valid.
>> [x] Checksums and signatures.
>> [x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
>> [x] No unexpected binary files
>> [x] All source files have ASF headers
>> [x] Can compile from source
>>
>> Ran `./scripts/verify.py`
>> Built and tested, `make build && make test`
>>
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré  于2025年7月22日周二 20:20写道：
>>
>>> +1 (non binding)
>>>
>>> I checked:
>>> - source distribution
>>> -- signature and checksum are good
>>> -- LICENSE and NOTICE are good
>>> -- ASF header present in expected files (tsv files don't have it but
>>> it's normal as tsv doesn't really support comment)
>>> -- No binary file found in the source distribution
>>>
>>> Thanks !
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 5:50 AM Xuanwo  wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hello, Apache Iceberg Rust Community,
>>> >
>>> > This is a call for a vote to release Apache Iceberg rust version
>>> v0.6.0.
>>> >
>>> > The tag to be voted on is 0.6.0-rc.1.
>>> >
>>> > The release candidate:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-rust-0.6.0-rc1/
>>> >
>>> > Keys to verify the release candidate:
>>> >
>>> > https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS
>>> >
>>> > I'm using my new key to sign this release, so it might need sometime
>>> to update in the CDN.
>>> >
>>> > Git tag for the release:
>>> >
>>> > https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/releases/tag/0.6.0-rc.1
>>> >
>>> > Please download, verify, and test.
>>> >
>>> > The VOTE will be open for at least 72 hours and until the necessary
>>> > number of votes are reached.
>>> >
>>> > [ ] +1 approve
>>> > [ ] +0 no opinion
>>> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>>> >
>>> > To learn more about Apache Iceberg, please see
>>> https://rust.iceberg.apache.org/
>>> >
>>> > Checklist for reference:
>>> >
>>> > [ ] Download links are valid.
>>> > [ ] Checksums and signatures.
>>> > [ ] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
>>> > [ ] No unexpected binary files
>>> > [ ] All source files have ASF headers
>>> > [ ] Can compile from source
>>> >
>>> > More details please refer to
>>> https://rust.iceberg.apache.org/release.html#how-to-verify-a-release.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks
>>> >
>>> > Xuanwo
>>> >
>>> > https://xuanwo.io/
>>>
>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg Rust 0.6.0 RC1

[Renjie Liu]

+1 (binding)

[x] Download links are valid. (there's a typo with "Git tag for the
release", I've added a fix)
[x] Checksums and signatures.
[x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
[x] No unexpected binary files
[] All source files have ASF headers (This is checked in ci)
[x] Can compile from source

I ran `make build && make test` on macbook with m4 chip.

On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 10:25 PM NOTME ZE  wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> [x] Download links are valid.
> [x] Checksums and signatures.
> [x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
> [x] No unexpected binary files
> [x] All source files have ASF headers
> [x] Can compile from source
>
> Ran `./scripts/verify.py`
> Built and tested, `make build && make test`
>
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré  于2025年7月22日周二 20:20写道：
>
>> +1 (non binding)
>>
>> I checked:
>> - source distribution
>> -- signature and checksum are good
>> -- LICENSE and NOTICE are good
>> -- ASF header present in expected files (tsv files don't have it but
>> it's normal as tsv doesn't really support comment)
>> -- No binary file found in the source distribution
>>
>> Thanks !
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 5:50 AM Xuanwo  wrote:
>> >
>> > Hello, Apache Iceberg Rust Community,
>> >
>> > This is a call for a vote to release Apache Iceberg rust version v0.6.0.
>> >
>> > The tag to be voted on is 0.6.0-rc.1.
>> >
>> > The release candidate:
>> >
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-rust-0.6.0-rc1/
>> >
>> > Keys to verify the release candidate:
>> >
>> > https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS
>> >
>> > I'm using my new key to sign this release, so it might need sometime to
>> update in the CDN.
>> >
>> > Git tag for the release:
>> >
>> > https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/releases/tag/0.6.0-rc.1
>> >
>> > Please download, verify, and test.
>> >
>> > The VOTE will be open for at least 72 hours and until the necessary
>> > number of votes are reached.
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 approve
>> > [ ] +0 no opinion
>> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>> >
>> > To learn more about Apache Iceberg, please see
>> https://rust.iceberg.apache.org/
>> >
>> > Checklist for reference:
>> >
>> > [ ] Download links are valid.
>> > [ ] Checksums and signatures.
>> > [ ] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
>> > [ ] No unexpected binary files
>> > [ ] All source files have ASF headers
>> > [ ] Can compile from source
>> >
>> > More details please refer to
>> https://rust.iceberg.apache.org/release.html#how-to-verify-a-release.
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> > Xuanwo
>> >
>> > https://xuanwo.io/
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg Rust 0.6.0 RC1

[NOTME ZE]

+1 (non-binding)

[x] Download links are valid.
[x] Checksums and signatures.
[x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
[x] No unexpected binary files
[x] All source files have ASF headers
[x] Can compile from source

Ran `./scripts/verify.py`
Built and tested, `make build && make test`

Jean-Baptiste Onofré  于2025年7月22日周二 20:20写道：

> +1 (non binding)
>
> I checked:
> - source distribution
> -- signature and checksum are good
> -- LICENSE and NOTICE are good
> -- ASF header present in expected files (tsv files don't have it but
> it's normal as tsv doesn't really support comment)
> -- No binary file found in the source distribution
>
> Thanks !
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 5:50 AM Xuanwo  wrote:
> >
> > Hello, Apache Iceberg Rust Community,
> >
> > This is a call for a vote to release Apache Iceberg rust version v0.6.0.
> >
> > The tag to be voted on is 0.6.0-rc.1.
> >
> > The release candidate:
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-rust-0.6.0-rc1/
> >
> > Keys to verify the release candidate:
> >
> > https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS
> >
> > I'm using my new key to sign this release, so it might need sometime to
> update in the CDN.
> >
> > Git tag for the release:
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/releases/tag/0.6.0-rc.1
> >
> > Please download, verify, and test.
> >
> > The VOTE will be open for at least 72 hours and until the necessary
> > number of votes are reached.
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >
> > To learn more about Apache Iceberg, please see
> https://rust.iceberg.apache.org/
> >
> > Checklist for reference:
> >
> > [ ] Download links are valid.
> > [ ] Checksums and signatures.
> > [ ] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
> > [ ] No unexpected binary files
> > [ ] All source files have ASF headers
> > [ ] Can compile from source
> >
> > More details please refer to
> https://rust.iceberg.apache.org/release.html#how-to-verify-a-release.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Xuanwo
> >
> > https://xuanwo.io/
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg Rust 0.6.0 RC1

[Jean-Baptiste Onofré]

+1 (non binding)

I checked:
- source distribution
-- signature and checksum are good
-- LICENSE and NOTICE are good
-- ASF header present in expected files (tsv files don't have it but
it's normal as tsv doesn't really support comment)
-- No binary file found in the source distribution

Thanks !

Regards
JB

On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 5:50 AM Xuanwo  wrote:
>
> Hello, Apache Iceberg Rust Community,
>
> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Iceberg rust version v0.6.0.
>
> The tag to be voted on is 0.6.0-rc.1.
>
> The release candidate:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-rust-0.6.0-rc1/
>
> Keys to verify the release candidate:
>
> https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS
>
> I'm using my new key to sign this release, so it might need sometime to 
> update in the CDN.
>
> Git tag for the release:
>
> https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/releases/tag/0.6.0-rc.1
>
> Please download, verify, and test.
>
> The VOTE will be open for at least 72 hours and until the necessary
> number of votes are reached.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
> To learn more about Apache Iceberg, please see 
> https://rust.iceberg.apache.org/
>
> Checklist for reference:
>
> [ ] Download links are valid.
> [ ] Checksums and signatures.
> [ ] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
> [ ] No unexpected binary files
> [ ] All source files have ASF headers
> [ ] Can compile from source
>
> More details please refer to 
> https://rust.iceberg.apache.org/release.html#how-to-verify-a-release.
>
> Thanks
>
> Xuanwo
>
> https://xuanwo.io/

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg Rust 0.6.0 RC1

[Kevin Liu]

+1 (non-binding)

[x] Download links are valid. (there's a typo with "Git tag for the
release", I've added a fix)
[x] Checksums and signatures.
[x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
[x] No unexpected binary files
[x] All source files have ASF headers
[x] Can compile from source

Ran `./scripts/verify.py`
Built and tested, `make build && make test`
Manually built and tested pyiceberg-core against pyiceberg

PS I added a few minor fixes for the release process, including the typo in
the release url above, https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/pull/1538
PPS there's a bug that prevents us from publishing the RC artifact to pypi
as pre-release. I added a fix in
https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/pull/1537

Best,
Kevin Liu

On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 8:51 PM Xuanwo  wrote:

> Hello, Apache Iceberg Rust Community,
>
> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Iceberg rust version v0.6.0.
>
> The tag to be voted on is 0.6.0-rc.1.
>
> The release candidate:
>
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-rust-0.6.0-rc1/
>
> Keys to verify the release candidate:
>
> https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS
>
> I'm using my new key to sign this release, so it might need sometime to
> update in the CDN.
>
> Git tag for the release:
>
> https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/releases/tag/0.6.0-rc.1
>
> Please download, verify, and test.
>
> The VOTE will be open for at least 72 hours and until the necessary
> number of votes are reached.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
> To learn more about Apache Iceberg, please see
> https://rust.iceberg.apache.org/
>
> Checklist for reference:
>
> [ ] Download links are valid.
> [ ] Checksums and signatures.
> [ ] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
> [ ] No unexpected binary files
> [ ] All source files have ASF headers
> [ ] Can compile from source
>
> More details please refer to
> https://rust.iceberg.apache.org/release.html#how-to-verify-a-release.
>
> Thanks
>
> Xuanwo
>
> https://xuanwo.io/
>