[GitHub] ignite pull request #1613: IGNITE-4815: CollisionSPI.onCollision() confusing...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1613 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

Re: one point optimisation

Regarding IgniteOnePhaseCommitNearSelfTest test , ignite's one phase optimisation works not as you said. I attached picture of message exchange. There are partial prepare phase exists, along with finish phase. пн, 3 апр. 2017 г. в 10:55, Christos Erotocritou : > As far

Re: TC should fail on AssertionError in logs

Yakov, I found following at first opened suite logs (Basic) 1) [INFO ][test-runner-#4966%future.GridEmbeddedFutureSelfTest%][root] Failed with unhandled error (normal behaviour): java.lang.AssertionError: Test assertion (should be ignored). 2) [INFO

Re: one point optimisation

As far as I know a partition is always allocated to a specific node and does not span nodes. Ignite has default 1024 partitions on start that are split equally across nodes. > On 3 Apr 2017, at 08:10, ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV wrote: > > in ur blog u texted belonging to the

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1610: Ignite 4813

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1610 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

Re: [jira] [Comment Edited] (IGNITE-4052) Add ability to set up users for MESOS

Hello everybody! Nikolay, I didn't have experience with ignite-yarn integration and didn't have idea how fix it, but its interesting for me. Can you write name of another java application, in which I can see how they connect to mesos. Also, can you write how correctly to test working of

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1721: Ignite 4477 Fix IgniteFuture.listen() and IgniteF...

GitHub user dkarachentsev opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1721 Ignite 4477 Fix IgniteFuture.listen() and IgniteFuture.chain() semantics PR to master You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull

Re: IGNITE - 4760 : working in hibernate module

Hello everyone! I added some change to method threadLocalForCache and added test testEntityCacheNonStrictFails. How to reproduce situation when updates can be recorded to another region?

Support for starting transaction in another thread

Hi, Igniters! This is a subtask for "distributed transaction of non-single coordinator" task. Will appreciate your thoughts on it. ticket : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4887 and a commit : https://github.com/voipp/ignite/commit/aa3487bd9c203394f534c605f84e06436b638e5c -- *Best

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-4905) ClassCastException in DML benchmarks

Alexander Paschenko created IGNITE-4905: --- Summary: ClassCastException in DML benchmarks Key: IGNITE-4905 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4905 Project: Ignite Issue

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1722: IGNITE-4905 DML benchmarks ClassCastException fix

GitHub user alexpaschenko opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1722 IGNITE-4905 DML benchmarks ClassCastException fix You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-4905

IGNITE-4188: Savepoints support inside of Ignite Transactions, thoughts about realisation

Hello, community. Sam, Yakov, Alex G., can you look my decision? try (Transaction tx = ignite.transactions().txStart()) { c.put(1, 1); tx.savepoint("mysavepoint"); c.put(2, 2); tx.rollbackToSavepoint("mysavepoint"); c.put(3, 3); tx.commit(); } I want to make it in

Re: one point optimisation

Aleksey, The blog describes the 1-phase commit at a high level, but I am still curious about the differences you found. Can you share them here? D. On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 2:11 AM, ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV wrote: > Regarding IgniteOnePhaseCommitNearSelfTest test , ignite's

Re: Adding ML to Ignite, IGNITE-4572

yeah thats good but GSOC application last till today only so any suggestion how to write the proposal or what need to be included in the proposal. -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Adding-ML-to-Ignite-IGNITE-4572-tp13936p16070.html Sent from

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1724: IGNITE-3582 CPP: Replaced pointers with reference...

GitHub user isapego opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1724 IGNITE-3582 CPP: Replaced pointers with references in function signatures where it's possible You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-4906) .NET: Examples tests hang

Pavel Tupitsyn created IGNITE-4906: -- Summary: .NET: Examples tests hang Key: IGNITE-4906 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4906 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1723: ignite-4851 : made GridDhtLocalPartition state ch...

GitHub user ilantukh opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1723 ignite-4851 : made GridDhtLocalPartition state change atomic with size check You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull

Re: TC should fail on AssertionError in logs

Change this to RuntimeException. I think it would be fine. Assertion in logs should mean something terrible from now and on. --Yakov

Re: one point optimisation

I've attached test that prints messages exchange . Which shows us that there are more messages then you declared in article. Perhaps, implementation has changed. I created it on base of IgniteOnePhaseCommitNearSelfTest пн, 3 апр. 2017 г. в 19:03, Dmitriy Setrakyan : >

Fwd: ScanQuery With BinaryObject

Crossposted to dev: Guys, ScanQuery filter code (see IgniteBiPredicate implementation below) can be cached on server side that can cause unexpected results. The main point here is server node never restarts while client does it with filter code changed. Is it ok? I try to add

Re: distributed transaction of non-single coordinator

so what do u think on my idea? пт, 31 Мар 2017 г., 11:05 ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV : > sorry for misleading you. We planned to support multi-node transactions, > but failed. > > пт, 31 мар. 2017 г. в 10:51, Alexey Goncharuk >: > > Well, now the

Re: one point optimisation

in ur blog u texted belonging to the same partition is nessesary for 1 phase commit. But its not guarantee belonging to the same node. Partition may span many nodes вс, 2 Апр 2017 г., 13:46 ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV : > thank u ! > > пт, 31 Мар 2017 г., 21:06 Denis Magda

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-4907) Excessive service instances can be started with dynamic deployment.

Andrew Mashenkov created IGNITE-4907: Summary: Excessive service instances can be started with dynamic deployment. Key: IGNITE-4907 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4907 Project:

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-4908) Reentrant lock looks much slower that cache locks.

Andrew Mashenkov created IGNITE-4908: Summary: Reentrant lock looks much slower that cache locks. Key: IGNITE-4908 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4908 Project: Ignite