[GitHub] ignite pull request #3601: gg-13377 : Fixed error handling for corrupted pag...

GitHub user ilantukh opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3601 gg-13377 : Fixed error handling for corrupted page store. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-7881) Add tests for using TreeMap/TreeSet in cache key

Ilya Kasnacheev created IGNITE-7881: --- Summary: Add tests for using TreeMap/TreeSet in cache key Key: IGNITE-7881 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7881 Project: Ignite

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-7880) Enum values not shown correctly in Webconsole

Mikhail Cherkasov created IGNITE-7880: - Summary: Enum values not shown correctly in Webconsole Key: IGNITE-7880 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7880 Project: Ignite

[GitHub] ignite pull request #3600: IGNITE-7860 JDBC thin driver: set default socket ...

GitHub user tledkov-gridgain opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3600 IGNITE-7860 JDBC thin driver: set default socket buffer sizes to 64Kb You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull

Re: Why does DataStreamer swallow exceptions?

Hello, Ilya. > I think it's time to end this, if that was the case. DataStreamer should > not be a special case and it should guarantee data safety. WDYT? +1 from me. I'm also facing this issue. Ticket - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7756 Discussion -

[GitHub] ignite pull request #3602: IGNITE-7881 Tests for using TreeMap or TreeSet as...

GitHub user alamar opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3602 IGNITE-7881 Tests for using TreeMap or TreeSet as cache key. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-7881

Why does DataStreamer swallow exceptions?

Dear Igniters, why do I have a hunch that DataStreamer would readily swallow exceptions? DataStreamerImpl:1756 swallows marshalling error, lines 1774 & 1781 eat deployment errors. Some people are worried they can fill a leaking vessel without noticing anything off. Also in line 2156 fsync() on

[GitHub] ignite pull request #3603: IGNITE-7882 Always use topology mapping for atomi...

GitHub user Jokser opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3603 IGNITE-7882 Always use topology mapping for atomic updates. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-7882

Re: Use of lambdas and other Java 8 features

Hi Vyacheslav, It is possible to use lambdas in test code and node local-only code (e.g. checkpointing, page memory, etc). In other words any other classes, which are transferred/may be trasnferred into network, can't use lambdas. There is also recommendation to avoid mass change of anonymous

Re: Use of lambdas and other Java 8 features

Hi Vyacheslav, I would not recommend using them without strong reasons. While convenient for developers in general, some of these features has hidden pitfails, which may affect performance and serialization. But as our product is very performance sensitive, it is better to have slightly more code

.NET Long Running Test execution timeout

Hi Pavel, Igniters, There is new TC failure from .NET tests. Issue link: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7878 Thanks to V.Ozerov we have located it is because usage of TcpDiscoveryMulticastIpFinder. Probably there is some other Ignite node running on other agents. Folks from

Use of lambdas and other Java 8 features

Hi, Igniters! Since we official support Java 8, I want to find out the following question: Are there any restrictions on using lambdas and other Java 8 features? -- Best Regards, Vyacheslav D.

[GitHub] ignite pull request #3604: ignite-6643-2.1Marshalling improvements (backport...

GitHub user agura opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3604 ignite-6643-2.1Marshalling improvements (backport) You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/agura/incubator-ignite ignite-6643-2.1

Re: Use of lambdas and other Java 8 features

By the way, usage of lambdas instead of anonymous class may have positive performance effect. And Java 8 provides us a number of new features, which allows Ignite operate faster (e.g. Arrays.parrallelSort, list.sort(), etc). пн, 5 мар. 2018 г. в 18:15, Vladimir Ozerov : >

Ignite nightly build job on Apache Jenkins server

Hi Igniters, There is a job on Apache Jenkins for nightly builds of Ignite [1], which was useful for providing fast fixes to our users. However, it seems that noone supports it any more as the last successfull build date is 31.05.2017. Does anyone know what is the issue with the job and why it

Re: IGNITE-5357 is ready for review (Replicated cache reads load balancing)

Dmitry, I saw them, but it looks like just randomness. I've checked it locally several times. They failed only in one TeamCity's build of four. Started build once again to be sure. On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 6:59 PM, Dmitry Pavlov wrote: > I can see Nikolay Izhikov as

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-7883) Cluster can have inconsistent affinity configuration

Mikhail Cherkasov created IGNITE-7883: - Summary: Cluster can have inconsistent affinity configuration Key: IGNITE-7883 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7883 Project: Ignite

Re: Ignite nightly build job on Apache Jenkins server

Hi Igor, This build did not make much sense anyway: 1) (At least) platform artifacts (.NET) can't be built there, so the package is incomplete 2) We have TeamCity, why duplicate maintenance efforts? Nightly release builds are very useful, but they should be done on TeamCity. (We have them for

Re: IGNITE-5357 is ready for review (Replicated cache reads load balancing)

I can see Nikolay Izhikov as reviewer in Upsource. Nikolay, would you run review first? I've found several suspicious tests : Test fail rate is less than 1%, it is probably new failure IgniteCacheTestSuite2: GridCachePartitionedTxSingleThreadedSelfTest.testOptimisticReadCommittedRollback (fail

Re: IGNITE-5357 is ready for review (Replicated cache reads load balancing)

I've done some test-builds iteration on the weekends. Tests [1] look well. Does anyone have time to do the final review [2][3] and merge it? [1] https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=1125676 [2] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3578 [3]

Re: .NET Long Running Test execution timeout

Hi Pavel, Thank you! Let's wait for fix at TeamCity. Sincerely, Dmitriy Pavlov пн, 5 мар. 2018 г. в 19:09, Pavel Tupitsyn : > Hi Dmitry, > > This test has been there forever. It checks that Ignite can start with > default config. > I think this is quite useful. TeamCity

[GitHub] ignite pull request #3605: ignite-6643-2.3 Marshalling improvements

GitHub user agura opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3605 ignite-6643-2.3 Marshalling improvements You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/agura/incubator-ignite ignite-6643-2.3 Alternatively

Data compression design proposal

Hi Igniters! I’d like to do next step in our data compression discussion [1]. Most Igniters vote for per-data-page compression. I’d like to accumulate main theses to start implementation: - page will be compressed with the dictionary-based approach (e.g.LZV) - page will be compressed in batch

[VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.4.0 RC1

Igniters, We have uploaded a 2.4.0 release candidate to https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ignite/2.4.0-rc1/ Git tag name is 2.4.0-rc1 This release includes the following changes: Ignite: * Introduced Baseline Affinity Topology * Ability to disable WAL for cache in runtime through

Re: Use of lambdas and other Java 8 features

Dmitry, Vladimir, thank you for the clarification! On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 6:23 PM, Dmitry Pavlov wrote: > By the way, usage of lambdas instead of anonymous class may have positive > performance effect. > > And Java 8 provides us a number of new features, which allows

Re: Why does DataStreamer swallow exceptions?

Ilya, IgniteDataStreamer#addData method returns future which should be completed with error if one is thrown on server side. Does this happen or not? -Val On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 4:10 AM, Nikolay Izhikov wrote: > Hello, Ilya. > > > I think it's time to end this, if that

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-7882) Atomic update requests should always use topology mappings instead of affinity

Pavel Kovalenko created IGNITE-7882: --- Summary: Atomic update requests should always use topology mappings instead of affinity Key: IGNITE-7882 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7882

Re: .NET Long Running Test execution timeout

In C++ there are no tests that use TcpDiscoveryMulticastIpFinder. There are examples, though, that use it. As far as I know, currently all examples use TcpDiscoveryMulticastIpFinder, and there were some objections against using VmIpFinder instead. Am I right, folks? Best Regards, Igor On Mon,

Re: MTCGA: Tests of the week

Hi, Denis, Igniters, I've updated the report for the last weekend mass run-all, please find it in wiki https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpageattachments.action?pageId=73631266 In 30 clean runs, there was 371 failed tests, 21 suites. During previous mass run there were 804 tests

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-7884) Ship SQL scripts with same database in Ignite

Denis Magda created IGNITE-7884: --- Summary: Ship SQL scripts with same database in Ignite Key: IGNITE-7884 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7884 Project: Ignite Issue Type: New

Re: Shipping SQL script + CSV files in Ignite examples

The vote passed by lazy consensus :) Here is a ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7884 Vladimir, look forward to co-operating with you on that task. -- Denis On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 4:49 PM, Denis Magda wrote: > Igniters, > > To demonstrate Ignite SQL

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-7885) Error on Baseline page on Web Console

Prachi Garg created IGNITE-7885: --- Summary: Error on Baseline page on Web Console Key: IGNITE-7885 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7885 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug

Re: MTCGA: Tests of the week

Astonishing progress! Thanks for keep driving this activity and making the project more and more reliable. -- Denis On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 1:47 PM, Dmitry Pavlov wrote: > Hi, Denis, Igniters, > > I've updated the report for the last weekend mass run-all, please find it >

[GitHub] ignite pull request #3531: IGNITE-7685: Fixed allocation rate.

Github user andrey-kuznetsov closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3531 ---

Ignite contibutors page

Hi Igniters, I noticed that I'm not mentioned on the community contributors page: https://ignite.apache.org/community/resources.html Perhaps there is someone else, who is not yet added. Or information is not up-to-date. Please check the data for yourself and respond if you need to be added / or

Re: Ignite contibutors page

Hi Dmitriy, Thanks for kicking off the discussion. I'll wait for a couple of days for other response and update the page in bulk. -- Denis On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 12:32 PM, Dmitry Pavlov wrote: > Hi Igniters, > > I noticed that I'm not mentioned on the community

[GitHub] ignite pull request #3525: Ignite 7517

Github user andrey-kuznetsov closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3525 ---

Fwd: checksum file Release Distribution Policy

Igniters, Do we comply with the next release requirements? Vladimir as a 2.4 release manager, could you double check that we are in a good state? -- Denis -- Forwarded message -- From: Henk P. Penning Date: Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 3:18 AM Subject: checksum file

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-7886) Provide a list of node Ids on the Baseline page on Web Console

Prachi Garg created IGNITE-7886: --- Summary: Provide a list of node Ids on the Baseline page on Web Console Key: IGNITE-7886 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7886 Project: Ignite

Re: Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) in Apache Ignite

Nikolay, what's your Wiki ID? I'll grant you required permissions. -- Denis On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 11:00 PM, Nikolay Izhikov wrote: > Hello, Denis. > > > I would encourage you creating an IEP > > That is exactly what we want to do :) > > But seems I have not sufficient

Re: Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) in Apache Ignite

Thank you, it's - nizhikov В Пн, 05/03/2018 в 15:09 -0800, Denis Magda пишет: > Nikolay, what's your Wiki ID? I'll grant you required permissions. > > -- > Denis > > On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 11:00 PM, Nikolay Izhikov wrote: > > Hello, Denis. > > > > > I would encourage you

Re: checksum file Release Distribution Policy

On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 12:57 PM, Denis Magda wrote: > Igniters, > > Do we comply with the next release requirements? Vladimir as a 2.4 release > manager, could you double check that we are in a good state? > I think we do. We only provide SHA files for our releases.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.4.0 RC1

+1 Checked Ignite.NET: * Build from sources * Download binaries and run examples * Build NuGet packages on TeamCity [1] and test them [1] https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=1126956 On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 10:42 PM, Vladimir Ozerov wrote: > Igniters, > > We

Re: Ignite nightly build job on Apache Jenkins server

On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 7:58 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn wrote: > Hi Igor, > > This build did not make much sense anyway: > 1) (At least) platform artifacts (.NET) can't be built there, so the > package is incomplete > 2) We have TeamCity, why duplicate maintenance efforts? > What

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.4.0 RC1

Regarding release notes: 1. No changes in Ignite.C++? 2. > Fixed output of big numbers in SQL query results Are we including trivial bugfixes now? On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 10:26 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn wrote: > +1 > > Checked Ignite.NET: > * Build from sources > * Download