Re[2]: [DISCUSSION] Ignite.C++ and CMake

2020-05-29 Thread Zhenya Stanilovsky
Ivan besides documentation [1] -s no —  no works -- catch_system_errors =no — works properly well, tests are passed.   boost 1.65   [1]  https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_65_0/libs/test/doc/html/boost_test/utf_reference/rt_param_reference/catch_system.html   >Hello! > >I didn't check tests since

Re: Re[2]: [DISCUSSION] Ignite.C++ and CMake

2020-05-29 Thread Ivan Daschinsky
Thanks you all. Run patch (I've changed some code also) on TC -- all CPP suites are green (GCC, CLang, Win64) пт, 29 мая 2020 г. в 15:02, Zhenya Stanilovsky : > > > Ivan besides documentation [1] > -s no — no works > -- catch_system_errors =no — works properly well, tests are passed. > > boost

Re: [DISCUSSION] Ignite.C++ and CMake

2020-05-29 Thread Ilya Kasnacheev
Hello! I didn't check tests since I don't develop AI C++, merely use it as user. That's where we should wait for Igor Sapego to check. Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev пт, 29 мая 2020 г. в 12:20, Ivan Daschinsky : > Ilya, thanks a lot! What about tests? I found one flag that must be > supplied to

Re: [DISCUSSION] Ignite.C++ and CMake

2020-05-29 Thread Ilya Kasnacheev
Hello! Looks good to me! But we probably also ask Igor to take a look. Compiled debug and release, without and with odbc, checked running thick node and ODBC connection on Linux. Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev чт, 28 мая 2020 г. в 17:31, Ivan Daschinsky : > Ok, PR is ready >

Re: [DISCUSSION] Ignite.C++ and CMake

2020-05-29 Thread Ivan Daschinsky
Also without with flag we can observe many failures of suites on TC https://ci.ignite.apache.org/buildConfiguration/IgniteTests24Java8_PlatformCLinux?branch=%3Cdefault%3E=builds#all-projects пт, 29 мая 2020 г. в 12:20, Ivan Daschinsky : > Ilya, thanks a lot! What about tests? I found one flag

Re: [DISCUSSION] Ignite.C++ and CMake

2020-05-29 Thread Ivan Daschinsky
Ilya, thanks a lot! What about tests? I found one flag that must be supplied to boost.tests. This flag should fix JVM crash of C++ suites on Linux. Zhenya Stanilovsky and me have checked, that without this flag tests failed with SIGSEGV early (boost catch this signal from jvm, but it is ok for

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-13095) .NET: Thin Client Compute does not cancel task on server when cancelled on client

2020-05-29 Thread Pavel Tupitsyn (Jira)
Pavel Tupitsyn created IGNITE-13095: --- Summary: .NET: Thin Client Compute does not cancel task on server when cancelled on client Key: IGNITE-13095 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13095

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-13096) Java thin client: Binary type schema is not registered for nested objects when CompactFooter is enabled

2020-05-29 Thread Aleksey Plekhanov (Jira)
Aleksey Plekhanov created IGNITE-13096: -- Summary: Java thin client: Binary type schema is not registered for nested objects when CompactFooter is enabled Key: IGNITE-13096 URL:

Ignite Binary Download Page - 2.8.1 Date

2020-05-29 Thread Glenn Wiebe
Folks, The recent 2.8.1 binary download incorrectly lists the date as March 3: [image: image.png] Can we update that to the actual date, which should be something like May 21st (which is the build date I see inside the libs). Thanks, Glenn

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-13097) Ignite OOMs when from local tests with many Caches

2020-05-29 Thread Scott Feldstein (Jira)
Scott Feldstein created IGNITE-13097: Summary: Ignite OOMs when from local tests with many Caches Key: IGNITE-13097 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13097 Project: Ignite

Re: Ignite Binary Download Page - 2.8.1 Date

2020-05-29 Thread Denis Magda
Glenn, Thanks for spotting and forwarding this to us. I've changed the date to May 27th which is the date of the release official announcement. - Denis On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 12:37 PM Glenn Wiebe wrote: > Folks, > > The recent 2.8.1 binary download incorrectly lists the date as March 3: > >