Re: Ignite Benchmarking Rules

Yes, we do. A team within AWS org wanted to contribute to the project and they are run a few machines for us. There's no money going back and forth, we are "just" using some of the resources. I guess the best way to get a few servers is to find people @Amazon, who'd be willing to make such

Re: Ignite Benchmarking Rules

Cos, I think Apache BigTop is using servers provided by Amazon. Can you make a suggestion on how can Ignite community get a few servers from Amazon for benchmarking as well? D. On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 5:57 AM, Anton Vinogradov wrote: > Guys, > > I fully agree that configured

Re: Ignite Benchmarking Rules

Guys, I fully agree that configured servers at Amazon is the best choice. But when you need to check that your changes has no performance drop you're able to use your own PC or PCs to checks that. All you need is to benchmark already released version vs version with your fix at same environment.

Re: Ignite Benchmarking Rules

Hello, Dmitriy. I think experienced members of community have specific number for benchmarking. Can we start from reference hardware configuration: Num of CPU, RAM and HDD(SDD?) configuration, network configs, etc. Can someone share that kind of knowledge - Which hardware is best for

Re: Ignite Benchmarking Rules

Alexey, I completely agree. However, for the benchmarks to be useful, then need to be run on the same hardware all the time. Apache Ignite does not have servers sitting around, available to run the benchmarks. Would be nice to see how other projects address it. Can Amazon donate servers for the

Ignite Benchmarking Rules

Hi, Igniters. Recently I’ve done some research in benchmarks for Ignite, and noticed that we don’t have any rules for running benchmarks and collecting result from them. Although sometimes we have tasks, which results need to be measured. I propose to formalize such things as: * set of