Re: [Apache Ignite Survey] Closed, results are attached

[Denis Magda]

Oops, anyway, it's not a big deal. Let's sum them up :)

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 8:10 AM, Dmitry Pavlov 
wrote:

> Hi Denis,
>
> Interesting results, thank you.
>
> Unfortunately Ignite Persistence came twice in used features.
>
> And it becomes a a little bit unclear which measurement should be
> considered correct: max, min, or average.
>
> Sincerely,
> Dmitriy Pavlov
>
>
> чт, 22 февр. 2018 г. в 4:17, Dmitriy Setrakyan :
>
> > Very useful.
> >
> > BTW, here is the ticket for MultiMap implementation. It has a very nice
> > design proposal and looks fairly simple to implement.
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-640
> >
> > Hope someone in the community can pick it up.
> >
> > D.
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 3:56 PM, Denis Magda  wrote:
> >
> > > Igniters,
> > >
> > > The survey is off and here is a snapshot of the results:
> > > https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-2T8S87DH8/
> > >
> > > Noteworthy observations:
> > >
> > >- 87% of respondents are software architects and engineers. These
> are
> > >the folks who help us to drive the project!
> > >
> > >
> > >- Most of Ignite use cases are in Banks and HighTech - this is what
> > the
> > >consistency and in-memory speed are valued for!
> > >
> > >
> > >- Majority of the deployments store up to 100 GB of data in up to 20
> > >nodes clusters while 10% of deployments maintain hundreds and
> > thousands
> > >nodes clusters - getting ready, community!
> > >
> > >
> > >- Ignite persistence is getting as valuable as the compute grid.
> > >
> > > Pay attention to the last question that contains a written individual
> > > feedback. It should guide our plans. For instance, I like this
> proposal:
> > >
> > > MultiMap support like in Guava is badly needed. Hazelcast has this and
> is
> > > highly used collection type, so much so this forces us to have to use
> > > Hazelcast over Ignite sadly in many apps
> > >
> > > --
> > > Denis
> > >
> >
>

Re: [Apache Ignite Survey] Closed, results are attached

[Dmitry Pavlov]

Hi Denis,

Interesting results, thank you.

Unfortunately Ignite Persistence came twice in used features.

And it becomes a a little bit unclear which measurement should be
considered correct: max, min, or average.

Sincerely,
Dmitriy Pavlov


чт, 22 февр. 2018 г. в 4:17, Dmitriy Setrakyan :

> Very useful.
>
> BTW, here is the ticket for MultiMap implementation. It has a very nice
> design proposal and looks fairly simple to implement.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-640
>
> Hope someone in the community can pick it up.
>
> D.
>
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 3:56 PM, Denis Magda  wrote:
>
> > Igniters,
> >
> > The survey is off and here is a snapshot of the results:
> > https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-2T8S87DH8/
> >
> > Noteworthy observations:
> >
> >- 87% of respondents are software architects and engineers. These are
> >the folks who help us to drive the project!
> >
> >
> >- Most of Ignite use cases are in Banks and HighTech - this is what
> the
> >consistency and in-memory speed are valued for!
> >
> >
> >- Majority of the deployments store up to 100 GB of data in up to 20
> >nodes clusters while 10% of deployments maintain hundreds and
> thousands
> >nodes clusters - getting ready, community!
> >
> >
> >- Ignite persistence is getting as valuable as the compute grid.
> >
> > Pay attention to the last question that contains a written individual
> > feedback. It should guide our plans. For instance, I like this proposal:
> >
> > MultiMap support like in Guava is badly needed. Hazelcast has this and is
> > highly used collection type, so much so this forces us to have to use
> > Hazelcast over Ignite sadly in many apps
> >
> > --
> > Denis
> >
>

Re: [Apache Ignite Survey] Closed, results are attached

[Dmitriy Setrakyan]

Very useful.

BTW, here is the ticket for MultiMap implementation. It has a very nice
design proposal and looks fairly simple to implement.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-640

Hope someone in the community can pick it up.

D.

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 3:56 PM, Denis Magda  wrote:

> Igniters,
>
> The survey is off and here is a snapshot of the results:
> https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-2T8S87DH8/
>
> Noteworthy observations:
>
>- 87% of respondents are software architects and engineers. These are
>the folks who help us to drive the project!
>
>
>- Most of Ignite use cases are in Banks and HighTech - this is what the
>consistency and in-memory speed are valued for!
>
>
>- Majority of the deployments store up to 100 GB of data in up to 20
>nodes clusters while 10% of deployments maintain hundreds and thousands
>nodes clusters - getting ready, community!
>
>
>- Ignite persistence is getting as valuable as the compute grid.
>
> Pay attention to the last question that contains a written individual
> feedback. It should guide our plans. For instance, I like this proposal:
>
> MultiMap support like in Guava is badly needed. Hazelcast has this and is
> highly used collection type, so much so this forces us to have to use
> Hazelcast over Ignite sadly in many apps
>
> --
> Denis
>