t; it seems that you can use
> >>>>>>>>>>>> PluginProvider#validateNewNode(org.apache.ignite.cluster.ClusterNode,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> java.io.Serializable) method. Does it fit for your needs?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>
te channel. The problem
I'm trying to solve is described below in the thread. The security
plugin in my case stores and analyzesinfo about a node that failed to join.
Regards,
Mikhail.
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: Joining node validation failure event.
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 201
s I mentioned above
> >>>>>>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>>>> event is disabled by default and no node will receive this event
> >>>>>>>>>>> without
> >>>>>>>>>>> an
e security
plugin in my case stores and analyzesinfo about a node that failed to join.
Regards,
Mikhail.
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: Joining node validation failure event.
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 21:43:33 +0300
From: Mikhail Petrov
To: Andrey Gura
lishing a new event too. But I'm concerned about the acceptance
> >>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>> that solution. Maybe it can be solved some other way? I will
> >>>>>>>>> appreciate
> >>>>>&g
to join.
Regards,
Mikhail.
Forwarded Message
Subject:Re: Joining node validation failure event.
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 21:43:33 +0300
From: Mikhail Petrov
To: Andrey Gura
Hi, Andrey.
In my task security plugin running on the coordinator must locally
handle
7
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Mikhail.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 02.12.2019 10:38, Ivan Pavlukhin wrote:
>>>>>>
t;>>>>>
> >>>>>> Mikhail.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 02.12.2019 10:38, Ivan Pavlukhin wrote:
> >>>>>>> Mikhail, Andrey,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Have you come to
me, it sounds useful
>>>>>>> to expose node join failure details somehow. The thing to decide on is
>>>>>>> a mechanism to expose it. Unfortunately, immediately have no idea
>>>>>>> better than using events.
>>>>>>>
>&
gt;>>> a mechanism to expose it. Unfortunately, immediately have no idea
> >>>>> better than using events.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> What is purpose of the special cluster wide event? Node is not joined
> >>>>>>
in the thread. The security
plugin in my case stores and analyzesinfo about a node that failed to join.
Regards,
Mikhail.
Forwarded Message
Subject:Re: Joining node validation failure event.
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 21:43:33 +0300
From: Mikhail Petrov
To: Andrey Gura
ow something about this
> >>>> node?
> >>> Was this question answered? I suppose that at least coordinator will
> >>> receive the event, will not it?
> >>>
> >>> чт, 28 нояб. 2019 г. в 10:10, Mikhail Petrov :
> >>>> Hi,
plugin in my case stores and analyzesinfo about a node that failed to join.
Regards,
Mikhail.
Forwarded Message
Subject:Re: Joining node validation failure event.
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 21:43:33 +0300
From: Mikhail Petrov
To: Andrey Gura
Hi, Andrey.
In my
;>
> >> I'm sorry that the discussion was moved in private channel. The problem
> >> I'm trying to solve is described below in the thread. The security
> >> plugin in my case stores and analyzesinfo about a node that failed to join.
> >>
> >>
>
.
Forwarded Message
Subject:Re: Joining node validation failure event.
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 21:43:33 +0300
From: Mikhail Petrov
To: Andrey Gura
Hi, Andrey.
In my task security plugin running on the coordinator must locally
handle the situation when some node is trying
.
>
> I'm sorry that the discussion was moved in private channel. The problem
> I'm trying to solve is described below in the thread. The security
> plugin in my case stores and analyzesinfo about a node that failed to join.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Mikhail.
>
>
>
> ---- Forward
:Re: Joining node validation failure event.
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 21:43:33 +0300
From: Mikhail Petrov
To: Andrey Gura
Hi, Andrey.
In my task security plugin running on the coordinator must locally
handle the situation when some node is trying to join the topology
Hi Mikhail,
Interesting topic. Could you please shed some light how a node
validation failure can be handled? Immediately cannot imagine how one
can handle it.
чт, 21 нояб. 2019 г. в 14:17, Mikhail Petrov :
>
> Hi, Andrey.
>
> I take part in the development of a custom security plugin for Apache
Hi, Andrey.
I take part in the development of a custom security plugin for Apache
Ignite. There is an information security requirement for which node
joining failures due to invalid configuration must be handled by the
plugin.
This is where my case comes from. Are there any objections to
Hi, Mikhail!
Could you please describe the case for this new event?
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 12:45 PM Mikhail Petrov wrote:
>
> Hello, Igniters.
>
> There is a case which requires to handle joining node validation failure
> in Ignite components and obtain information of the node that tried to
>
20 matches
Mail list logo