Re: [DISCUSS] Branching for a release soon?

2016-08-31 Thread Jim Apple
That might be the place for release candidates. I added KEYS to
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/impala/KEYS now,
following http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Jim Apple  wrote:
> Thanks, Tom!
>
> I have added my key to
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/impala/KEYS.
>
> Committers who are interested in acting as release managers at some
> point might be interested in getting keys, joining the apache web of
> trust, putting the keys on home.apache.org, etc. The instructions for
> all of this can be found by poking around the apache web space. Here
> is a reasonable place to start:
> http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html
>
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 3:39 AM, Tom White  wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 12:07 AM, Jim Apple  wrote:
>>> Testing is passing. I am waiting on the following commits to land in
>>> master, though, before I cherry-pick them to branch-2.7.0:
>>>
>>> https://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/3995/
>>> https://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/3937/
>>> https://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/3936/
>>> https://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/4160/
>>>
>>> These are all intellectual property / branding changes, but they are
>>> all things that I think the IPMC may require of a release:
>>>
>>> 1. A copyright audit
>>>
>>> 2. Java package changes away from cloudera
>>
>> Strictly speaking this is not necessary for the first incubator
>> release, but it's good to do early if possible.
>>
>>>
>>> 3. Incubating DISCLAIMER file
>>>
>>> Once these are committed and in 2.7.0, I will re-test and make a
>>> release candidate tarball. I think the next steps are to
>>> cryptographically sign it, put it in my home.apache.org web space,
>>
>> Release candidates should go in a directory under
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/, then once they have
>> been approved they can be moved to the final location with a single
>> commit.
>>
>> See http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#stage.
>>
>> Tom
>>
>>> then ask PMC members to download it, build it, test it, and vote on
>>> it.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Jim Apple  wrote:
 #1 is now done.

 I am now doing #2, making the branch and starting testing. Expect
 possible churn on this since this is our first attempt at cutting an
 upstream release.

 On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Jim Apple  wrote:
> I would like to volunteer to be the next release manager for an
> upcoming Apache Impala 2.7 (incubating) release. I plan to:
>
> 1. Get a vote done adding to our bylaws the procedure for creating a
> branch. (See thread from yesterday)
>
> 2. Create a release branch, possibly backdated a few commits from HEAD
> to a commit that looks stable.
>
> 3. Maintain that branch by cherry-picking bugfix commits from "master"
> as necessary to get the tests running cleanly.
>
> 4. Make a release candidate and call for a vote here, then on the IPMC
> list (which is required for Incubator releases)
>
> Obviously, this glosses over some details about publishing and signing
> releases, but I would welcome feedback on this outline.


Re: [DISCUSS] Branching for a release soon?

2016-08-31 Thread Jim Apple
Thanks, Tom!

I have added my key to
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/impala/KEYS.

Committers who are interested in acting as release managers at some
point might be interested in getting keys, joining the apache web of
trust, putting the keys on home.apache.org, etc. The instructions for
all of this can be found by poking around the apache web space. Here
is a reasonable place to start:
http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 3:39 AM, Tom White  wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 12:07 AM, Jim Apple  wrote:
>> Testing is passing. I am waiting on the following commits to land in
>> master, though, before I cherry-pick them to branch-2.7.0:
>>
>> https://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/3995/
>> https://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/3937/
>> https://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/3936/
>> https://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/4160/
>>
>> These are all intellectual property / branding changes, but they are
>> all things that I think the IPMC may require of a release:
>>
>> 1. A copyright audit
>>
>> 2. Java package changes away from cloudera
>
> Strictly speaking this is not necessary for the first incubator
> release, but it's good to do early if possible.
>
>>
>> 3. Incubating DISCLAIMER file
>>
>> Once these are committed and in 2.7.0, I will re-test and make a
>> release candidate tarball. I think the next steps are to
>> cryptographically sign it, put it in my home.apache.org web space,
>
> Release candidates should go in a directory under
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/, then once they have
> been approved they can be moved to the final location with a single
> commit.
>
> See http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#stage.
>
> Tom
>
>> then ask PMC members to download it, build it, test it, and vote on
>> it.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Jim Apple  wrote:
>>> #1 is now done.
>>>
>>> I am now doing #2, making the branch and starting testing. Expect
>>> possible churn on this since this is our first attempt at cutting an
>>> upstream release.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Jim Apple  wrote:
 I would like to volunteer to be the next release manager for an
 upcoming Apache Impala 2.7 (incubating) release. I plan to:

 1. Get a vote done adding to our bylaws the procedure for creating a
 branch. (See thread from yesterday)

 2. Create a release branch, possibly backdated a few commits from HEAD
 to a commit that looks stable.

 3. Maintain that branch by cherry-picking bugfix commits from "master"
 as necessary to get the tests running cleanly.

 4. Make a release candidate and call for a vote here, then on the IPMC
 list (which is required for Incubator releases)

 Obviously, this glosses over some details about publishing and signing
 releases, but I would welcome feedback on this outline.


Re: [DISCUSS] Branching for a release soon?

2016-08-31 Thread Tom White
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 12:07 AM, Jim Apple  wrote:
> Testing is passing. I am waiting on the following commits to land in
> master, though, before I cherry-pick them to branch-2.7.0:
>
> https://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/3995/
> https://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/3937/
> https://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/3936/
> https://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/4160/
>
> These are all intellectual property / branding changes, but they are
> all things that I think the IPMC may require of a release:
>
> 1. A copyright audit
>
> 2. Java package changes away from cloudera

Strictly speaking this is not necessary for the first incubator
release, but it's good to do early if possible.

>
> 3. Incubating DISCLAIMER file
>
> Once these are committed and in 2.7.0, I will re-test and make a
> release candidate tarball. I think the next steps are to
> cryptographically sign it, put it in my home.apache.org web space,

Release candidates should go in a directory under
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/, then once they have
been approved they can be moved to the final location with a single
commit.

See http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#stage.

Tom

> then ask PMC members to download it, build it, test it, and vote on
> it.
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Jim Apple  wrote:
>> #1 is now done.
>>
>> I am now doing #2, making the branch and starting testing. Expect
>> possible churn on this since this is our first attempt at cutting an
>> upstream release.
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Jim Apple  wrote:
>>> I would like to volunteer to be the next release manager for an
>>> upcoming Apache Impala 2.7 (incubating) release. I plan to:
>>>
>>> 1. Get a vote done adding to our bylaws the procedure for creating a
>>> branch. (See thread from yesterday)
>>>
>>> 2. Create a release branch, possibly backdated a few commits from HEAD
>>> to a commit that looks stable.
>>>
>>> 3. Maintain that branch by cherry-picking bugfix commits from "master"
>>> as necessary to get the tests running cleanly.
>>>
>>> 4. Make a release candidate and call for a vote here, then on the IPMC
>>> list (which is required for Incubator releases)
>>>
>>> Obviously, this glosses over some details about publishing and signing
>>> releases, but I would welcome feedback on this outline.


Re: [DISCUSS] Branching for a release soon?

2016-08-30 Thread Jim Apple
Testing is passing. I am waiting on the following commits to land in
master, though, before I cherry-pick them to branch-2.7.0:

https://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/3995/
https://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/3937/
https://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/3936/
https://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/4160/

These are all intellectual property / branding changes, but they are
all things that I think the IPMC may require of a release:

1. A copyright audit

2. Java package changes away from cloudera

3. Incubating DISCLAIMER file

Once these are committed and in 2.7.0, I will re-test and make a
release candidate tarball. I think the next steps are to
cryptographically sign it, put it in my home.apache.org web space,
then ask PMC members to download it, build it, test it, and vote on
it.


On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Jim Apple  wrote:
> #1 is now done.
>
> I am now doing #2, making the branch and starting testing. Expect
> possible churn on this since this is our first attempt at cutting an
> upstream release.
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Jim Apple  wrote:
>> I would like to volunteer to be the next release manager for an
>> upcoming Apache Impala 2.7 (incubating) release. I plan to:
>>
>> 1. Get a vote done adding to our bylaws the procedure for creating a
>> branch. (See thread from yesterday)
>>
>> 2. Create a release branch, possibly backdated a few commits from HEAD
>> to a commit that looks stable.
>>
>> 3. Maintain that branch by cherry-picking bugfix commits from "master"
>> as necessary to get the tests running cleanly.
>>
>> 4. Make a release candidate and call for a vote here, then on the IPMC
>> list (which is required for Incubator releases)
>>
>> Obviously, this glosses over some details about publishing and signing
>> releases, but I would welcome feedback on this outline.


Re: [DISCUSS] Branching for a release soon?

2016-08-29 Thread Jim Apple
#1 is now done.

I am now doing #2, making the branch and starting testing. Expect
possible churn on this since this is our first attempt at cutting an
upstream release.

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Jim Apple  wrote:
> I would like to volunteer to be the next release manager for an
> upcoming Apache Impala 2.7 (incubating) release. I plan to:
>
> 1. Get a vote done adding to our bylaws the procedure for creating a
> branch. (See thread from yesterday)
>
> 2. Create a release branch, possibly backdated a few commits from HEAD
> to a commit that looks stable.
>
> 3. Maintain that branch by cherry-picking bugfix commits from "master"
> as necessary to get the tests running cleanly.
>
> 4. Make a release candidate and call for a vote here, then on the IPMC
> list (which is required for Incubator releases)
>
> Obviously, this glosses over some details about publishing and signing
> releases, but I would welcome feedback on this outline.


Re: [DISCUSS] Branching for a release soon?

2016-08-19 Thread Jim Apple
Todd, I see this as being useful for future releases, even if it
doesn't get used for this one. Thanks for volunteering to look into
that.

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Todd Lipcon  wrote:
> I believe the newer versions of gerrit support a label-like concept called
> 'hashtags' (apparently the authors of Gerrit love Instagram). They allow
> you to tag a review/commit with arbitrary strings. Perhaps this feature
> could be used so that patch authors can tag their reviews/commits as
> "stable-candidate" and Jim can easily query for them? Then when it has been
> cherry-picked to the branch, a "stable-picked" tag can be added to indicate
> it has been merged?
>
> If this sounds useful, let me know and I can look into enabling the feature
> on gerrit.cloudera.org. I think some non-trivial config change has to be
> made, though, so would take a week or two.
>
> -Todd
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Tim Armstrong 
> wrote:
>
>> I think the first sounds easiest. If commit authors really think something
>> should go in the release they can always reach out to you.
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Jim Apple  wrote:
>>
>> > I hadn't decided yet. What do you think?
>> >
>> > I could test the release, then look for bug fixes that landed in
>> > master after my branch started that fix anything that doesn't pass.
>> >
>> > Or I could reach out to commit authors and ask them, or I could ask
>> > them to email me, like you mentioned.
>> >
>> > Or I could read commit messages and cherry-pick anything that is a bug
>> fix.
>> >
>> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Tim Armstrong 
>> > wrote:
>> > > How do you plan to choose which commits to cherry-pick? Should we let
>> you
>> > > know if we think a patch should/shouldn't be part of the release?
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Tom White  wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Thanks for volunteering to do the release Jim! The plan looks fine to
>> > me.
>> > >>
>> > >> Tom
>> > >>
>> > >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Todd Lipcon 
>> wrote:
>> > >> > Sounds great to me!
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Todd
>> > >> >
>> > >> > On Aug 19, 2016 8:41 AM, "Jim Apple"  wrote:
>> > >> >
>> > >> >> I would like to volunteer to be the next release manager for an
>> > >> >> upcoming Apache Impala 2.7 (incubating) release. I plan to:
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> 1. Get a vote done adding to our bylaws the procedure for creating
>> a
>> > >> >> branch. (See thread from yesterday)
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> 2. Create a release branch, possibly backdated a few commits from
>> > HEAD
>> > >> >> to a commit that looks stable.
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> 3. Maintain that branch by cherry-picking bugfix commits from
>> > "master"
>> > >> >> as necessary to get the tests running cleanly.
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> 4. Make a release candidate and call for a vote here, then on the
>> > IPMC
>> > >> >> list (which is required for Incubator releases)
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> Obviously, this glosses over some details about publishing and
>> > signing
>> > >> >> releases, but I would welcome feedback on this outline.
>> > >> >>
>> > >>
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Todd Lipcon
> Software Engineer, Cloudera


Re: [DISCUSS] Branching for a release soon?

2016-08-19 Thread Todd Lipcon
I believe the newer versions of gerrit support a label-like concept called
'hashtags' (apparently the authors of Gerrit love Instagram). They allow
you to tag a review/commit with arbitrary strings. Perhaps this feature
could be used so that patch authors can tag their reviews/commits as
"stable-candidate" and Jim can easily query for them? Then when it has been
cherry-picked to the branch, a "stable-picked" tag can be added to indicate
it has been merged?

If this sounds useful, let me know and I can look into enabling the feature
on gerrit.cloudera.org. I think some non-trivial config change has to be
made, though, so would take a week or two.

-Todd

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Tim Armstrong 
wrote:

> I think the first sounds easiest. If commit authors really think something
> should go in the release they can always reach out to you.
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Jim Apple  wrote:
>
> > I hadn't decided yet. What do you think?
> >
> > I could test the release, then look for bug fixes that landed in
> > master after my branch started that fix anything that doesn't pass.
> >
> > Or I could reach out to commit authors and ask them, or I could ask
> > them to email me, like you mentioned.
> >
> > Or I could read commit messages and cherry-pick anything that is a bug
> fix.
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Tim Armstrong 
> > wrote:
> > > How do you plan to choose which commits to cherry-pick? Should we let
> you
> > > know if we think a patch should/shouldn't be part of the release?
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Tom White  wrote:
> > >
> > >> Thanks for volunteering to do the release Jim! The plan looks fine to
> > me.
> > >>
> > >> Tom
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Todd Lipcon 
> wrote:
> > >> > Sounds great to me!
> > >> >
> > >> > Todd
> > >> >
> > >> > On Aug 19, 2016 8:41 AM, "Jim Apple"  wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> I would like to volunteer to be the next release manager for an
> > >> >> upcoming Apache Impala 2.7 (incubating) release. I plan to:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> 1. Get a vote done adding to our bylaws the procedure for creating
> a
> > >> >> branch. (See thread from yesterday)
> > >> >>
> > >> >> 2. Create a release branch, possibly backdated a few commits from
> > HEAD
> > >> >> to a commit that looks stable.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> 3. Maintain that branch by cherry-picking bugfix commits from
> > "master"
> > >> >> as necessary to get the tests running cleanly.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> 4. Make a release candidate and call for a vote here, then on the
> > IPMC
> > >> >> list (which is required for Incubator releases)
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Obviously, this glosses over some details about publishing and
> > signing
> > >> >> releases, but I would welcome feedback on this outline.
> > >> >>
> > >>
> >
>



-- 
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera


Re: [DISCUSS] Branching for a release soon?

2016-08-19 Thread Tim Armstrong
I think the first sounds easiest. If commit authors really think something
should go in the release they can always reach out to you.

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Jim Apple  wrote:

> I hadn't decided yet. What do you think?
>
> I could test the release, then look for bug fixes that landed in
> master after my branch started that fix anything that doesn't pass.
>
> Or I could reach out to commit authors and ask them, or I could ask
> them to email me, like you mentioned.
>
> Or I could read commit messages and cherry-pick anything that is a bug fix.
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Tim Armstrong 
> wrote:
> > How do you plan to choose which commits to cherry-pick? Should we let you
> > know if we think a patch should/shouldn't be part of the release?
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Tom White  wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks for volunteering to do the release Jim! The plan looks fine to
> me.
> >>
> >> Tom
> >>
> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Todd Lipcon  wrote:
> >> > Sounds great to me!
> >> >
> >> > Todd
> >> >
> >> > On Aug 19, 2016 8:41 AM, "Jim Apple"  wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> I would like to volunteer to be the next release manager for an
> >> >> upcoming Apache Impala 2.7 (incubating) release. I plan to:
> >> >>
> >> >> 1. Get a vote done adding to our bylaws the procedure for creating a
> >> >> branch. (See thread from yesterday)
> >> >>
> >> >> 2. Create a release branch, possibly backdated a few commits from
> HEAD
> >> >> to a commit that looks stable.
> >> >>
> >> >> 3. Maintain that branch by cherry-picking bugfix commits from
> "master"
> >> >> as necessary to get the tests running cleanly.
> >> >>
> >> >> 4. Make a release candidate and call for a vote here, then on the
> IPMC
> >> >> list (which is required for Incubator releases)
> >> >>
> >> >> Obviously, this glosses over some details about publishing and
> signing
> >> >> releases, but I would welcome feedback on this outline.
> >> >>
> >>
>


Re: [DISCUSS] Branching for a release soon?

2016-08-19 Thread Jim Apple
I hadn't decided yet. What do you think?

I could test the release, then look for bug fixes that landed in
master after my branch started that fix anything that doesn't pass.

Or I could reach out to commit authors and ask them, or I could ask
them to email me, like you mentioned.

Or I could read commit messages and cherry-pick anything that is a bug fix.

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Tim Armstrong  wrote:
> How do you plan to choose which commits to cherry-pick? Should we let you
> know if we think a patch should/shouldn't be part of the release?
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Tom White  wrote:
>
>> Thanks for volunteering to do the release Jim! The plan looks fine to me.
>>
>> Tom
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Todd Lipcon  wrote:
>> > Sounds great to me!
>> >
>> > Todd
>> >
>> > On Aug 19, 2016 8:41 AM, "Jim Apple"  wrote:
>> >
>> >> I would like to volunteer to be the next release manager for an
>> >> upcoming Apache Impala 2.7 (incubating) release. I plan to:
>> >>
>> >> 1. Get a vote done adding to our bylaws the procedure for creating a
>> >> branch. (See thread from yesterday)
>> >>
>> >> 2. Create a release branch, possibly backdated a few commits from HEAD
>> >> to a commit that looks stable.
>> >>
>> >> 3. Maintain that branch by cherry-picking bugfix commits from "master"
>> >> as necessary to get the tests running cleanly.
>> >>
>> >> 4. Make a release candidate and call for a vote here, then on the IPMC
>> >> list (which is required for Incubator releases)
>> >>
>> >> Obviously, this glosses over some details about publishing and signing
>> >> releases, but I would welcome feedback on this outline.
>> >>
>>


Re: [DISCUSS] Branching for a release soon?

2016-08-19 Thread Tim Armstrong
How do you plan to choose which commits to cherry-pick? Should we let you
know if we think a patch should/shouldn't be part of the release?

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Tom White  wrote:

> Thanks for volunteering to do the release Jim! The plan looks fine to me.
>
> Tom
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Todd Lipcon  wrote:
> > Sounds great to me!
> >
> > Todd
> >
> > On Aug 19, 2016 8:41 AM, "Jim Apple"  wrote:
> >
> >> I would like to volunteer to be the next release manager for an
> >> upcoming Apache Impala 2.7 (incubating) release. I plan to:
> >>
> >> 1. Get a vote done adding to our bylaws the procedure for creating a
> >> branch. (See thread from yesterday)
> >>
> >> 2. Create a release branch, possibly backdated a few commits from HEAD
> >> to a commit that looks stable.
> >>
> >> 3. Maintain that branch by cherry-picking bugfix commits from "master"
> >> as necessary to get the tests running cleanly.
> >>
> >> 4. Make a release candidate and call for a vote here, then on the IPMC
> >> list (which is required for Incubator releases)
> >>
> >> Obviously, this glosses over some details about publishing and signing
> >> releases, but I would welcome feedback on this outline.
> >>
>


Re: [DISCUSS] Branching for a release soon?

2016-08-19 Thread Tom White
Thanks for volunteering to do the release Jim! The plan looks fine to me.

Tom

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Todd Lipcon  wrote:
> Sounds great to me!
>
> Todd
>
> On Aug 19, 2016 8:41 AM, "Jim Apple"  wrote:
>
>> I would like to volunteer to be the next release manager for an
>> upcoming Apache Impala 2.7 (incubating) release. I plan to:
>>
>> 1. Get a vote done adding to our bylaws the procedure for creating a
>> branch. (See thread from yesterday)
>>
>> 2. Create a release branch, possibly backdated a few commits from HEAD
>> to a commit that looks stable.
>>
>> 3. Maintain that branch by cherry-picking bugfix commits from "master"
>> as necessary to get the tests running cleanly.
>>
>> 4. Make a release candidate and call for a vote here, then on the IPMC
>> list (which is required for Incubator releases)
>>
>> Obviously, this glosses over some details about publishing and signing
>> releases, but I would welcome feedback on this outline.
>>


Re: [DISCUSS] Branching for a release soon?

2016-08-19 Thread Todd Lipcon
Sounds great to me!

Todd

On Aug 19, 2016 8:41 AM, "Jim Apple"  wrote:

> I would like to volunteer to be the next release manager for an
> upcoming Apache Impala 2.7 (incubating) release. I plan to:
>
> 1. Get a vote done adding to our bylaws the procedure for creating a
> branch. (See thread from yesterday)
>
> 2. Create a release branch, possibly backdated a few commits from HEAD
> to a commit that looks stable.
>
> 3. Maintain that branch by cherry-picking bugfix commits from "master"
> as necessary to get the tests running cleanly.
>
> 4. Make a release candidate and call for a vote here, then on the IPMC
> list (which is required for Incubator releases)
>
> Obviously, this glosses over some details about publishing and signing
> releases, but I would welcome feedback on this outline.
>