[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-1860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Dan Haywood resolved ISIS-1860.
-------------------------------
    Resolution: Fixed

> CommandReification.DISABLED is broken / incorrectly documented.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ISIS-1860
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-1860
>             Project: Isis
>          Issue Type: Documentation
>    Affects Versions: 1.16.0
>            Reporter: Dan Haywood
>            Assignee: Dan Haywood
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.16.1
>
>
> Don't intend to change the implementation, but what I observe is that setting 
> commandReification=DISABLED does not necessarily prevent a command from being 
> persisted.  All it does is prevent a CommandFacet from being installed on the 
> corresponding action or property in the metamodel.
> A Command object is always created by CommandContext.  If there is a 
> CommandService implementation, then it delegates to that to act as the 
> factory of the Command.  So reification always occurs.
> If an action invocation or property edit causes objects to be modified, then 
> the Command#setPersistHint(...) is set to true.  And, if there is no command 
> facet, then the CommandServiceJdo will default the 
> Command#setPersistence(...) to PERSIST_IF_HINTED.
> The net result is that if commandReification is DISABLED, then commands are 
> still persisted if they cause any objects to be dirtied.  
> To prevent commands being persisted, instead use 
> @Action(commandPersistence=NOT_PERSISTED), and make sure that 
> @Action(command=ENABLED).
>  
> object is updated with a persist hint.  In the case of the incode platform's 
> Command module, the CommandService#complete(Command) is called, its 
> implementation will 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to