[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julian Reschke updated JCR-4387:
Attachment: JCR-4387.diff
> Wrong error message when same-name-sibling is prevented on import
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16691699#comment-16691699
]
Julian Reschke commented on JCR-4387:
-
Test case moved into separate class:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julian Reschke updated JCR-4387:
Fix Version/s: 2.18
> Incorrect exception message when same-name-sibling is prevented on import
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julian Reschke updated JCR-4387:
Labels: candidate_jcr_2_16 (was: )
> Incorrect exception message when same-name-sibling is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julian Reschke updated JCR-4387:
Summary: Incorrect exception message when same-name-sibling is prevented on
import (was: Wrong
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julian Reschke updated JCR-4387:
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
> Incorrect exception message when same-name-sibling is prevented on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julian Reschke resolved JCR-4387.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.17.7
> Incorrect exception message when
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16691719#comment-16691719
]
Julian Reschke commented on JCR-4387:
-
trunk: [r1846896|http://svn.apache.org/r1846896]
> Incorrect
Hi,
I intend to backport OAK-7867 to Oak 1.8 and 1.6. This fixes an issue
that can cause sever data loss with the segment node store. There is a
medium to high risk with this backport as it touches some of the core
parts of the segment node store. To mitigate the risk we ran a 14 days
longevity
+1
On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 at 17:50, Michael Dürig wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I intend to backport OAK-7867 to Oak 1.8 and 1.6. This fixes an issue
> that can cause sever data loss with the segment node store. There is a
> medium to high risk with this backport as it touches some of the core
> parts of the
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 11:50 AM Michael Dürig wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I intend to backport OAK-7867 to Oak 1.8 and 1.6. This fixes an issue
> that can cause sever data loss with the segment node store. There is a
> medium to high risk with this backport as it touches some of the core
> parts of the
11 matches
Mail list logo