Re: Jackrabbit and JDK versions

2016-09-27 Thread Julian Reschke 

On 2016-09-27 09:03, Amit Jain wrote:

Hi,

My preference is also 2.

Since, Oak 1.2 uses JR 2.12 and needs compatibility with JDK 6, we
should leave 2.12 at JDK 6.

Thanks
Amit


Good point. That IMHO settles the question.

Best regards, Julian

Re: Jackrabbit and JDK versions

2016-09-27 Thread Amit Jain 
Hi,

My preference is also 2.

Since, Oak 1.2 uses JR 2.12 and needs compatibility with JDK 6, we should
leave 2.12 at JDK 6.

Thanks
Amit

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Julian Reschke 
wrote:

> On 2016-09-22 13:10, Davide Giannella wrote:
>
>> On 21/09/2016 14:45, Julian Reschke wrote:
>>
>>> 3) Switch trunk and 2.12 to JDK 7.
>>>
>> +1
>>
>> Davide
>>
>
> Little feedback so far. I assume silence is approval :-)
>
> I opened  to track the
> change for trunk; we can make the decision for 2.12 later on.
>
> Best regards, Julian
>
>
>
>

Re: Jackrabbit and JDK versions

2016-09-27 Thread Julian Reschke 

On 2016-09-22 13:10, Davide Giannella wrote:

On 21/09/2016 14:45, Julian Reschke wrote:

3) Switch trunk and 2.12 to JDK 7.

+1

Davide


Little feedback so far. I assume silence is approval :-)

I opened  to track the 
change for trunk; we can make the decision for 2.12 later on.


Best regards, Julian

Re: Jackrabbit and JDK versions

2016-09-22 Thread Davide Giannella 
On 21/09/2016 14:45, Julian Reschke wrote:
> 3) Switch trunk and 2.12 to JDK 7.
+1

Davide