[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1169) Is Jena US Export classified due to encryption in dependencies?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15581793#comment-15581793 ] Stian Soiland-Reyes commented on JENA-1169: --- Yes, there's no legal requirement for it to be in a

Re: Graph on Cassandra

I like DynamoDB as a target for this sort of thing. There are many tasks which are small-scale yet critical where it would otherwise be hard to provide a distributed and reliable database. Put that together with Lambda, which does the same for computation, and you are cooking with gas. I

Re: RDF Patch - experiences suggesting changes

On 14/10/16 11:59, A. Soroka wrote: ... 6/ Packets of change. To have 4 (label a patch with reversible) and 5 (the version details), there needs to be somewhere to put the information. Having it in the patch itself means that the whole unit can be stored in a file. If it is in the

Re: Graph on Cassandra

Hi Claude, There is certainly interest from me. What the best thing to do depends on various factors. By putting it in extras I presume you mean it gets added to the release? That is not the only way forward. An important aspect of Apache is "Community over code" - will there be a

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1245) Use Fuseki2 for HTTP testing in jena-jdbc

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15582446#comment-15582446 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1245: -- Github user afs closed the pull request at:

Re: Graph on Cassandra

There's also: https://github.com/cumulusrdf/cumulusrdf in a similar vein (RDF over Cassandra). Not sure what kind of particular uses it expects to support. --- A. Soroka The University of Virginia Library > On Oct 17, 2016, at 7:02 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote: > > Hi Claude, >

[GitHub] jena pull request #179: Reorganise control of a test Fuseki server for HTTP ...

Github user ajs6f commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/179#discussion_r83655593 --- Diff: jena-fuseki1/src/test/java/org/apache/jena/fuseki/ServerCtl.java --- @@ -18,39 +18,113 @@ package org.apache.jena.fuseki; +import

[GitHub] jena pull request #179: Reorganise control of a test Fuseki server for HTTP ...

Github user ajs6f commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/179#discussion_r83656694 --- Diff: jena-fuseki1/src/test/java/org/apache/jena/fuseki/ServerCtl.java --- @@ -18,39 +18,113 @@ package org.apache.jena.fuseki; +import

[GitHub] jena issue #179: Reorganise control of a test Fuseki server for HTTP API tes...

Github user afs commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/179 `AbstractFusekiTest` -- it isn't so simple though as there is only one super class and it ends up competing for that. And the Auth tests need to be different again. So this PR is just Fuseki1,

[GitHub] jena pull request #179: Reorganise control of a test Fuseki server for HTTP ...

Github user afs closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/179 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1245) Use Fuseki2 for HTTP testing in jena-jdbc

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15582455#comment-15582455 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1245: -- GitHub user afs reopened a pull request:

[GitHub] jena pull request #179: Reorganise control of a test Fuseki server for HTTP ...

GitHub user afs reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/179 Reorganise control of a test Fuseki server for HTTP API testing. JENA-1245 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/afs/jena

[jira] [Comment Edited] (JENA-1169) Is Jena US Export classified due to encryption in dependencies?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15582037#comment-15582037 ] Andy Seaborne edited comment on JENA-1169 at 10/17/16 12:04 PM: Right -

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1169) Is Jena US Export classified due to encryption in dependencies?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15582037#comment-15582037 ] Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-1169: - Right - it's only the binaries that need an export statement.

Re: Graph on Cassandra

IIRC It stores CBDs indexed by subject so it is the "other" model to Rya. Better for LDP (??). Andy On 17/10/16 15:41, A. Soroka wrote: There's also: https://github.com/cumulusrdf/cumulusrdf in a similar vein (RDF over Cassandra). Not sure what kind of particular uses it expects

Re: Graph on Cassandra

Yep, http://iswc2011.semanticweb.org/fileadmin/iswc/Papers/Workshops/SSWS/Ladwig-et-all-SSWS2011.pdf indicates that they are indexing by subject. As someone who has implemented LDP, that is definitely the approach that makes sense there. --- A. Soroka The University of Virginia Library > On