Re: Building with Java9

Fixed, and in case you come across this in other situations: maven-plugin-javadoc now ignores Instead, there is . This does not seem to be mentioned anywhere, at least I could not find except buried deep inside JIRA. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-511 I don't understand

Re: Building with Java9

Done, Elephas has an override for surefire (see other email). The build-java9 job has been re-activated and set to run once a day. It runs "mvn clean verify -Pdev" (no javadoc). Elsewhere, the normal development build test is unhappy about javadoc in jena-iri (no source changes). But it is

Re: Building with Java9

Nope, not using anything from Java 9, myself. But I haven't looked that carefully at library changes. (I am looking forward to private members on interfaces.) I don't personally know anyone using Jigsaw (the new module system), and to my (low level of) understanding, it isn't really meant for

Re: Building with Java9

Works for me. I think it's good to take as many steps as we can to do this (= make each one as small as we can). ajs6f > On Feb 6, 2018, at 8:00 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote: > > Would there be any problems if the plugin settings for a building wither > Java9 were put into

Re: Building with Java9

Would there be any problems if the plugin settings for a building wither Java9 were put into master? (not building _for_ java9). One thing needed is a minimum version of maven of 3.5.0 (3.5.2 is the current latest). If that's OK, the Jenkins job can be activated to build for java8 with

Re: Building with Java9

I'm not sure how that helps: [INFO] org.apache.jena:jena-elephas-common:jar:3.7.0-SNAPSHOT [INFO] +- org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-common:jar:2.7.0:provided [INFO] | +- org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-annotations:jar:2.7.0:provided [INFO] | | \- jdk.tools:jdk.tools:jar:1.8:system It still depends on a

Re: Building with Java9

It may be worth bumping the default HDFS version to 2.7.0 as that is the most prevalent in the popular distributions currently Rob On 02/02/2018, 18:03, "Andy Seaborne" wrote: JENA-1475 I've managed to the build working with java9, outputting java8

Re: Building with Java9

Well, I read about this some time ago and was wondering how many people are really aware of the fact that no more security updates will be delivered 6 month after the release of a new version. Most people in our group are still working on Java 8, if not necessary probably nobody here will upgrade

Re: Building with Java9

Ditto (haven't been paying much attention). A six month cycle is pretty fast, in some ways. At least it will be if we have to do a lot of work for each version. ajs6f > On Feb 5, 2018, at 11:34 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote: > > I hadn't grok'ed (or, to be honest, paid attention

Re: Building with Java9

I hadn't grok'ed (or, to be honest, paid attention to) the details: http://blog.joda.org/2018/02/java-9-has-six-weeks-to-live.html Java 8 LTS -> Java 11 LTS (Sep 2018) then only four months until end of LTS for Java8. Andy

Re: Building with Java9

On 02/02/18 18:02, Andy Seaborne wrote: 2/Full build, jaavdoc javadoc fails at jena-core (despite it compiled). The problem is java.xml.bind - it looks to me like the javadoc is running in "java9" mode and I haven't found out how to override that. java.xml.bind is not an available module

Re: Building with Java9

Thanks for finding that out. Some trickery to get a java8 tools.jar available might work but would be awfully unstable, needing path names. Andy Warning - switching build for java9, not just build with java9 for java8, crashed Eclipse for me in such a way I had to delete the workspace

Re: Building with Java9

The Hadoop libs, even the latest major release version 3.0.0, are still based on Java 7 resp. Java 8, see [1] Thus, it could be a blocker. Cheers, Lorenz [1] http://central.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/hadoop/hadoop-annotations/3.0.0/hadoop-annotations-3.0.0.pom On 02.02.2018 19:02, Andy