On 07/03/18 17:23, Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 07/03/18 16:51, Dave Reynolds wrote:
On 07/03/18 16:29, Andy Seaborne wrote:
JENA-1499 may have knock on effects.
Adding a quad and deleting a quad and still listing the graph name
would be OK but "contains graph" returns false in TIM and true in
I've got a PR in now for 1499 (TIM remembers graph names even after they are
empty):
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/374
Whether or not that's the whole story here, that's a different question!
ajs6f
> On Mar 7, 2018, at 12:23 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
>
>
> On
On 07/03/18 16:51, Dave Reynolds wrote:
On 07/03/18 16:29, Andy Seaborne wrote:
JENA-1499 may have knock on effects.
Adding a quad and deleting a quad and still listing the graph name
would be OK but "contains graph" returns false in TIM and true in
general. That might make a difference -
On 07/03/18 16:29, Andy Seaborne wrote:
JENA-1499 may have knock on effects.
Adding a quad and deleting a quad and still listing the graph name would
be OK but "contains graph" returns false in TIM and true in general.
That might make a difference - I haven't traced that part of the code.
JENA-1499 may have knock on effects.
Adding a quad and deleting a quad and still listing the graph name would
be OK but "contains graph" returns false in TIM and true in general.
That might make a difference - I haven't traced that part of the code.
As for the :3030, ":" is one of the nasty
On 07/03/18 12:59, Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 06/03/18 22:43, Dave Reynolds wrote:
Hi Andy,
Thanks for confirming you seeing something similar, glad I wasn't
hallucinating!
Not sure any more that I am :-|
There are ghost graphs in a TIM dataset after deletion, JENA-1499, but
I'm not seeing
On 06/03/18 22:43, Dave Reynolds wrote:
Hi Andy,
Thanks for confirming you seeing something similar, glad I wasn't
hallucinating!
Not sure any more that I am :-|
There are ghost graphs in a TIM dataset after deletion, JENA-1499, but
I'm not seeing an empty store and do see the added
Hi Andy,
Thanks for confirming you seeing something similar, glad I wasn't
hallucinating!
I've tried with '' instead of "" in the shell script version of the test
with identical results.
Confirmed that using --memTDB the test passes for me.
Dave
On 06/03/18 17:29, Andy Seaborne wrote:
Weird.
I ran this script with Fuseki v3.6.0 "--mem" and also "--memTDB" for
steps up to and including 6.
https://gist.github.com/afs/cd6953b06985dde37a9581134ec13165
There something going on with TIM because I'm seeing empty graph5 with
TIM but not with TDB.
I may have seen no results