Re: Timer adjustment feature / Bug 60018 (was Thoughts on 2 proposals)

Hi Vladimir, Could we consider introducing Java 8 in immediate next version for this feature ? This would also allow to introduce the Renderer based on Java 8 Web browser in this version. Initially it was delayed to N+2 version but it's maybe an opportunity to move faster to java 8. What are the

Re: svn commit: r1759062 - in /jmeter/trunk: bin/ src/components/org/apache/jmeter/validation/ src/core/org/apache/jmeter/gui/action/ xdocs/ xdocs/usermanual/

I think this is a bad idea. It's unnecessary code to achieve what can already be done by disabling the timer. Please don't make changes like this before discussing them first. On 3 September 2016 at 10:24, wrote: > Author: pmouawad > Date: Sat Sep 3 09:24:08 2016 > New

Re: svn commit: r1759062 - in /jmeter/trunk: bin/ src/components/org/apache/jmeter/validation/ src/core/org/apache/jmeter/gui/action/ xdocs/ xdocs/usermanual/

Hi sebb, It has no relation with timers. Please read the code and my bugzilla. Regards On Saturday, September 3, 2016, sebb wrote: > I think this is a bad idea. > > It's unnecessary code to achieve what can already be done by disabling > the timer. > > Please don't make

Re: Early Access builds of JDK 8u112 b04, JDK 9 b130 are available on java.net

Hello Rory, I submitted today a crash report on Java 8 b101 and b102. I didn't get yet a bug id but I wanted to highlight the following: - The crash occurs Always using this code http://docs.oracle.com/javafx/2/swing/SimpleSwingBrowser.java.htm and loading a regular HTML page (I didn't find in

Re: Early Access builds of JDK 8u112 b04, JDK 9 b130 are available on java.net

Bug has review ID : JI-9043439 Regards Philippe On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Philippe Mouawad < philippe.moua...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Rory, > I submitted today a crash report on Java 8 b101 and b102. > > I didn't get yet a bug id but I wanted to highlight the following: > - The crash

Re: Timer adjustment feature / Bug 60018 (was Thoughts on 2 proposals)

Philippe>Could we consider introducing Java 8 in immediate next version for this feature ? As you know, I'm all ears for migrating to Java 8. I'm pretty sure this particular issue of "adding behavior to timers without breaking compatibility with previous third-party timers" could be solved with

Re: Timer adjustment feature / Bug 60018 (was Thoughts on 2 proposals)

On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Vladimir Sitnikov < sitnikov.vladi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Philippe>Could we consider introducing Java 8 in immediate next version for > this feature ? > > As you know, I'm all ears for migrating to Java 8. > > I'm pretty sure this particular issue of "adding

Re: Timer adjustment feature / Bug 60018 (was Thoughts on 2 proposals)

Philippe>Frankly I doubt it. At least the platforms usually used for Load Testing Philippe>don't have the same constraints as those running J2EE Server can have. Exactly. I might be wrong, but I do not remember "-1" responses for moving to Java 8. Philippe>Well since there was no abstract class,