Re: [jruby-dev] Proposal: performance work slides to second priority under bugs
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 05:59:28 -0600, Charles Oliver Nutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I propose that from now until we get the next 1.1 prerelease out (post > beta 2), performance work should be a second priority. We're currently > at 45 open bugs on 1.0 branch, 103 on 1.1 branch (trunk...and 3 are high > priorities for 1.1b2), 8 scheduled for "1.x", and 143 unscheduled. > > I believe we need to work on reducing the number of bugs. Performance is > looking great by most accounts, and we still need to accept performance > bugs as they come in. But performance should be secondary for a while > behind getting functionality, stability, and uniformity (of API, etc) > fixes done. Sounds good to me. I should have some free time for JRuby and other things over the holidays. -mental - To unsubscribe from this list please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
Re: [jruby-dev] Proposal: performance work slides to second priority under bugs
yes! On 12/20/07, Charles Oliver Nutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I propose that from now until we get the next 1.1 prerelease out (post > beta 2), performance work should be a second priority. We're currently > at 45 open bugs on 1.0 branch, 103 on 1.1 branch (trunk...and 3 are high > priorities for 1.1b2), 8 scheduled for "1.x", and 143 unscheduled. > > I believe we need to work on reducing the number of bugs. Performance is > looking great by most accounts, and we still need to accept performance > bugs as they come in. But performance should be secondary for a while > behind getting functionality, stability, and uniformity (of API, etc) > fixes done. > > This would include performance of Joni itself, which we need to look at > getting a stable, official release of. > > Of course any really egregious performance problems can get a higher > priority, and any fixes related to memory leaks are top-priority above > general functionality bugs. > > Seem like a reasonable plan for now? > > - Charlie > > - > To unsubscribe from this list please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > -- Blog: http://www.bloglines.com/blog/ThomasEEnebo Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] , [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
Re: [jruby-dev] Proposal: performance work slides to second priority under bugs
I like the idea because of my own selfish reason: the things stopping me from upgrading JRuby in my project are bugs, not performance problems.
Re: [jruby-dev] Proposal: performance work slides to second priority under bugs
Charles Oliver Nutter wrote: I propose that from now until we get the next 1.1 prerelease out (post beta 2), performance work should be a second priority. We're currently at 45 open bugs on 1.0 branch, 103 on 1.1 branch (trunk...and 3 are high priorities for 1.1b2), 8 scheduled for "1.x", and 143 unscheduled. I believe we need to work on reducing the number of bugs. Performance is looking great by most accounts, and we still need to accept performance bugs as they come in. But performance should be secondary for a while behind getting functionality, stability, and uniformity (of API, etc) fixes done. This would include performance of Joni itself, which we need to look at getting a stable, official release of. Of course any really egregious performance problems can get a higher priority, and any fixes related to memory leaks are top-priority above general functionality bugs. Seem like a reasonable plan for now? - Charlie - To unsubscribe from this list please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email I'm in. On memory leak duty at the moment, as you know. -- Ola Bini (http://ola-bini.blogspot.com) JRuby Core Developer Developer, ThoughtWorks Studios (http://studios.thoughtworks.com) Practical JRuby on Rails (http://apress.com/book/view/9781590598818) "Yields falsehood when quined" yields falsehood when quined. - To unsubscribe from this list please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
