Edoardo Comar created KAFKA-4206:
------------------------------------

             Summary: Improve handling of invalid credentials to mitigate DOS 
issue (especially on SSL listeners)
                 Key: KAFKA-4206
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-4206
             Project: Kafka
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: network, security
    Affects Versions: 0.10.0.1, 0.10.0.0
            Reporter: Edoardo Comar
            Assignee: Edoardo Comar


The current handling of invalid credentials (ie wrong user/password) is to let 
the `SaslException` thrown from an implementation of 
`javax.security.sasl.SaslServer.evaluateResponse()`
bubble up the call stack until it gets caught in 
`org.apache.kafka.common.network.Selector.pollSelectionKeys()`
where the `KafkaChannel` gets closed - which will cause the client that made 
the request to be disconnected.

This will happen however after the server has used considerable resources, 
especially for the SSL handshake which appears to be computationally expensive 
in Java.

We have observed that if just a few clients keep repeating requests with the 
wrong credentials, it is quite easy to get all the network processing threads 
in the Kafka server busy doing SSL handshakes.

This makes a Kafka cluster to easily suffer from a Denial Of Service - also non 
intentional  - attack. 
It can be non intentional, i.e. also caused by friendly clients, for example 
because a Kafka Java client Producer supplied with the wrong credentials will 
not throw an exception on publishing, so it may keep attempting to connect 
without the caller realising.

An easy fix which we have implemented and will supply a PR for is to *delay* 
considerably closing the `KafkaChannel` in the `Selector`, but obviously 
without blocking the processing thread.

This has be tested to be very effective in reducing the cpu usage spikes caused 
by non malicious ssl clients using invalid credentials.




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to