Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 2.6.0 release
Just to follow up, we've released AK 2.6.0 today. See the announcement thread. On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 4:01 PM Randall Hauch wrote: > I've just announced 2.6.0 RC0 in a vote thread to this list. If you find > any issues, please reply to that "[VOTE] 2.6.0 RC0" thread. > > Thanks, and best regards! > > Randall > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 7:44 PM Matthias J. Sax wrote: > >> Randall, >> >> we found another blocker: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10262 >> >> Luckily, we have already a PR for it. >> >> >> -Matthias >> >> >> On 7/8/20 3:05 PM, Sophie Blee-Goldman wrote: >> > Hey Randall, >> > >> > We just discovered another regression in 2.6: >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10249 >> > >> > The fix is extremely straightforward -- only about two lines of actual >> > code -- and low risk. It is a new regression introduced in 2.6 and >> affects >> > all Streams apps with any suppression or other in-memory state. >> > >> > The PR is already ready here: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8996 >> > >> > Best, >> > Sophie >> > >> > On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 10:59 AM John Roesler >> wrote: >> > >> >> Hi Randall, >> >> >> >> While developing system tests, I've just unearthed a new 2.6 >> regression: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10247 >> >> >> >> I've got a PR in progress. Hoping to finish it up today: >> >> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8994 >> >> >> >> Sorry for the trouble, >> >> -John >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020, at 09:29, Randall Hauch wrote: >> >>> Thanks for raising this, David. I agree it makes sense to include this >> >> fix >> >>> in 2.6, so I've adjusted the "Fix Version(s)" field to include >> '2.6.0'. >> >>> >> >>> Best regards, >> >>> >> >>> Randall >> >>> >> >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 8:25 AM David Jacot >> wrote: >> >>> >> Hi Randall, >> >> We have discovered an annoying issue that we introduced in 2.5: >> >> Describing topics with the command line tool fails if the user does >> not >> have the >> privileges to access the ListPartitionReassignments API. I believe >> that >> this is the >> case for most non-admin users. >> >> I propose to include the fix in 2.6. The fix is trivial so low risk. >> >> What >> do you think? >> >> JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10212 >> PR: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8947 >> >> Best, >> David >> >> On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 4:39 AM John Roesler >> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi Randall, >> > >> > I neglected to notify this thread when I merged the fix for >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10185 >> > on June 19th. I'm sorry about that oversight. It is marked with >> > a fix version of 2.6.0. >> > >> > On a side node, I have a fix for KAFKA-10173, which I'm merging >> > and backporting right now. >> > >> > Thanks for managing the release, >> > -John >> > >> > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020, at 10:23, Randall Hauch wrote: >> >> Thanks for the update, folks! >> >> >> >> Based upon Jira [1], we currently have 4 issues that are considered >> >> blockers for the 2.6.0 release and production of RCs: >> >> >> >>- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10134 - High CPU >> issue >> >>during rebalance in Kafka consumer after upgrading to 2.5 >> (unassigned) >> >>- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10143 - Can no >> >> longer >> >>change replication throttle with reassignment tool (Jason G) >> >>- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10166 - Excessive >> >>TaskCorruptedException seen in testing (Sophie, Bruno) >> >>- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10173 >> >>- BufferUnderflowException during Kafka Streams Upgrade (John R) >> >> >> >> and one critical issue that may be a regression that at this time >> >> will >> > not >> >> block production of RCs: >> >> >> >>- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10017 - Flaky >> >> Test >> >>EosBetaUpgradeIntegrationTest.shouldUpgradeFromEosAlphaToEosBeta >> > (Matthias) >> >> >> >> and one build/release issue we'd like to fix if possible but will >> >> not >> > block >> >> RCs or the release: >> >> >> >>- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9381 >> >>- kafka-streams-scala: Javadocs + Scaladocs not published on >> >> maven >> > central >> >>(me) >> >> >> >> I'm working with the assignees and reporters of these issues (via >> > comments >> >> on the issues) to identify an ETA and to track progress. Anyone is >> > welcome >> >> to chime in on those issues. >> >> >> >> At this time, no other changes (other than PRs that only >> >> fix/improve >> > tests) >> >> should be merged to the `2.6` branch. If you think you've >> >> identified a >> >>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 2.6.0 release
I've just announced 2.6.0 RC0 in a vote thread to this list. If you find any issues, please reply to that "[VOTE] 2.6.0 RC0" thread. Thanks, and best regards! Randall On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 7:44 PM Matthias J. Sax wrote: > Randall, > > we found another blocker: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10262 > > Luckily, we have already a PR for it. > > > -Matthias > > > On 7/8/20 3:05 PM, Sophie Blee-Goldman wrote: > > Hey Randall, > > > > We just discovered another regression in 2.6: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10249 > > > > The fix is extremely straightforward -- only about two lines of actual > > code -- and low risk. It is a new regression introduced in 2.6 and > affects > > all Streams apps with any suppression or other in-memory state. > > > > The PR is already ready here: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8996 > > > > Best, > > Sophie > > > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 10:59 AM John Roesler > wrote: > > > >> Hi Randall, > >> > >> While developing system tests, I've just unearthed a new 2.6 regression: > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10247 > >> > >> I've got a PR in progress. Hoping to finish it up today: > >> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8994 > >> > >> Sorry for the trouble, > >> -John > >> > >> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020, at 09:29, Randall Hauch wrote: > >>> Thanks for raising this, David. I agree it makes sense to include this > >> fix > >>> in 2.6, so I've adjusted the "Fix Version(s)" field to include '2.6.0'. > >>> > >>> Best regards, > >>> > >>> Randall > >>> > >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 8:25 AM David Jacot > wrote: > >>> > Hi Randall, > > We have discovered an annoying issue that we introduced in 2.5: > > Describing topics with the command line tool fails if the user does > not > have the > privileges to access the ListPartitionReassignments API. I believe > that > this is the > case for most non-admin users. > > I propose to include the fix in 2.6. The fix is trivial so low risk. > >> What > do you think? > > JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10212 > PR: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8947 > > Best, > David > > On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 4:39 AM John Roesler > >> wrote: > > > Hi Randall, > > > > I neglected to notify this thread when I merged the fix for > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10185 > > on June 19th. I'm sorry about that oversight. It is marked with > > a fix version of 2.6.0. > > > > On a side node, I have a fix for KAFKA-10173, which I'm merging > > and backporting right now. > > > > Thanks for managing the release, > > -John > > > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020, at 10:23, Randall Hauch wrote: > >> Thanks for the update, folks! > >> > >> Based upon Jira [1], we currently have 4 issues that are considered > >> blockers for the 2.6.0 release and production of RCs: > >> > >>- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10134 - High CPU > issue > >>during rebalance in Kafka consumer after upgrading to 2.5 > (unassigned) > >>- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10143 - Can no > >> longer > >>change replication throttle with reassignment tool (Jason G) > >>- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10166 - Excessive > >>TaskCorruptedException seen in testing (Sophie, Bruno) > >>- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10173 > >>- BufferUnderflowException during Kafka Streams Upgrade (John R) > >> > >> and one critical issue that may be a regression that at this time > >> will > > not > >> block production of RCs: > >> > >>- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10017 - Flaky > >> Test > >>EosBetaUpgradeIntegrationTest.shouldUpgradeFromEosAlphaToEosBeta > > (Matthias) > >> > >> and one build/release issue we'd like to fix if possible but will > >> not > > block > >> RCs or the release: > >> > >>- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9381 > >>- kafka-streams-scala: Javadocs + Scaladocs not published on > >> maven > > central > >>(me) > >> > >> I'm working with the assignees and reporters of these issues (via > > comments > >> on the issues) to identify an ETA and to track progress. Anyone is > > welcome > >> to chime in on those issues. > >> > >> At this time, no other changes (other than PRs that only > >> fix/improve > > tests) > >> should be merged to the `2.6` branch. If you think you've > >> identified a > > new > >> blocker issue or believe another existing issue should be treated > >> as a > >> blocker for 2.6.0, please mark the issue's `fix version` as `2.6.0` > _and_ > >> respond to this thread with details, and I will work with you to > > determine > >> whether it is
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 2.6.0 release
Randall, we found another blocker: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10262 Luckily, we have already a PR for it. -Matthias On 7/8/20 3:05 PM, Sophie Blee-Goldman wrote: > Hey Randall, > > We just discovered another regression in 2.6: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10249 > > The fix is extremely straightforward -- only about two lines of actual > code -- and low risk. It is a new regression introduced in 2.6 and affects > all Streams apps with any suppression or other in-memory state. > > The PR is already ready here: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8996 > > Best, > Sophie > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 10:59 AM John Roesler wrote: > >> Hi Randall, >> >> While developing system tests, I've just unearthed a new 2.6 regression: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10247 >> >> I've got a PR in progress. Hoping to finish it up today: >> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8994 >> >> Sorry for the trouble, >> -John >> >> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020, at 09:29, Randall Hauch wrote: >>> Thanks for raising this, David. I agree it makes sense to include this >> fix >>> in 2.6, so I've adjusted the "Fix Version(s)" field to include '2.6.0'. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Randall >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 8:25 AM David Jacot wrote: >>> Hi Randall, We have discovered an annoying issue that we introduced in 2.5: Describing topics with the command line tool fails if the user does not have the privileges to access the ListPartitionReassignments API. I believe that this is the case for most non-admin users. I propose to include the fix in 2.6. The fix is trivial so low risk. >> What do you think? JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10212 PR: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8947 Best, David On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 4:39 AM John Roesler >> wrote: > Hi Randall, > > I neglected to notify this thread when I merged the fix for > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10185 > on June 19th. I'm sorry about that oversight. It is marked with > a fix version of 2.6.0. > > On a side node, I have a fix for KAFKA-10173, which I'm merging > and backporting right now. > > Thanks for managing the release, > -John > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020, at 10:23, Randall Hauch wrote: >> Thanks for the update, folks! >> >> Based upon Jira [1], we currently have 4 issues that are considered >> blockers for the 2.6.0 release and production of RCs: >> >>- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10134 - High CPU issue >>during rebalance in Kafka consumer after upgrading to 2.5 (unassigned) >>- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10143 - Can no >> longer >>change replication throttle with reassignment tool (Jason G) >>- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10166 - Excessive >>TaskCorruptedException seen in testing (Sophie, Bruno) >>- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10173 >>- BufferUnderflowException during Kafka Streams Upgrade (John R) >> >> and one critical issue that may be a regression that at this time >> will > not >> block production of RCs: >> >>- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10017 - Flaky >> Test >>EosBetaUpgradeIntegrationTest.shouldUpgradeFromEosAlphaToEosBeta > (Matthias) >> >> and one build/release issue we'd like to fix if possible but will >> not > block >> RCs or the release: >> >>- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9381 >>- kafka-streams-scala: Javadocs + Scaladocs not published on >> maven > central >>(me) >> >> I'm working with the assignees and reporters of these issues (via > comments >> on the issues) to identify an ETA and to track progress. Anyone is > welcome >> to chime in on those issues. >> >> At this time, no other changes (other than PRs that only >> fix/improve > tests) >> should be merged to the `2.6` branch. If you think you've >> identified a > new >> blocker issue or believe another existing issue should be treated >> as a >> blocker for 2.6.0, please mark the issue's `fix version` as `2.6.0` _and_ >> respond to this thread with details, and I will work with you to > determine >> whether it is indeed a blocker. >> >> As always, let me know here if you have any questions/concerns. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Randall >> >> [1] >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/KAFKA/versions/12346918 >> >> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 8:27 AM Mario Molina wrote: >> >>> Hi Randal, >>> >>> Ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9018 is not a > blocker >>> so >>> it can be moved to the 2.7.0 version. >>> >>> Mario >>> >
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 2.6.0 release
Hey Randall, We just discovered another regression in 2.6: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10249 The fix is extremely straightforward -- only about two lines of actual code -- and low risk. It is a new regression introduced in 2.6 and affects all Streams apps with any suppression or other in-memory state. The PR is already ready here: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8996 Best, Sophie On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 10:59 AM John Roesler wrote: > Hi Randall, > > While developing system tests, I've just unearthed a new 2.6 regression: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10247 > > I've got a PR in progress. Hoping to finish it up today: > https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8994 > > Sorry for the trouble, > -John > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020, at 09:29, Randall Hauch wrote: > > Thanks for raising this, David. I agree it makes sense to include this > fix > > in 2.6, so I've adjusted the "Fix Version(s)" field to include '2.6.0'. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Randall > > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 8:25 AM David Jacot wrote: > > > > > Hi Randall, > > > > > > We have discovered an annoying issue that we introduced in 2.5: > > > > > > Describing topics with the command line tool fails if the user does not > > > have the > > > privileges to access the ListPartitionReassignments API. I believe that > > > this is the > > > case for most non-admin users. > > > > > > I propose to include the fix in 2.6. The fix is trivial so low risk. > What > > > do you think? > > > > > > JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10212 > > > PR: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8947 > > > > > > Best, > > > David > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 4:39 AM John Roesler > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Randall, > > > > > > > > I neglected to notify this thread when I merged the fix for > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10185 > > > > on June 19th. I'm sorry about that oversight. It is marked with > > > > a fix version of 2.6.0. > > > > > > > > On a side node, I have a fix for KAFKA-10173, which I'm merging > > > > and backporting right now. > > > > > > > > Thanks for managing the release, > > > > -John > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020, at 10:23, Randall Hauch wrote: > > > > > Thanks for the update, folks! > > > > > > > > > > Based upon Jira [1], we currently have 4 issues that are considered > > > > > blockers for the 2.6.0 release and production of RCs: > > > > > > > > > >- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10134 - High CPU > > > issue > > > > >during rebalance in Kafka consumer after upgrading to 2.5 > > > (unassigned) > > > > >- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10143 - Can no > longer > > > > >change replication throttle with reassignment tool (Jason G) > > > > >- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10166 - Excessive > > > > >TaskCorruptedException seen in testing (Sophie, Bruno) > > > > >- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10173 > > > > >- BufferUnderflowException during Kafka Streams Upgrade (John R) > > > > > > > > > > and one critical issue that may be a regression that at this time > will > > > > not > > > > > block production of RCs: > > > > > > > > > >- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10017 - Flaky > Test > > > > >EosBetaUpgradeIntegrationTest.shouldUpgradeFromEosAlphaToEosBeta > > > > (Matthias) > > > > > > > > > > and one build/release issue we'd like to fix if possible but will > not > > > > block > > > > > RCs or the release: > > > > > > > > > >- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9381 > > > > >- kafka-streams-scala: Javadocs + Scaladocs not published on > maven > > > > central > > > > >(me) > > > > > > > > > > I'm working with the assignees and reporters of these issues (via > > > > comments > > > > > on the issues) to identify an ETA and to track progress. Anyone is > > > > welcome > > > > > to chime in on those issues. > > > > > > > > > > At this time, no other changes (other than PRs that only > fix/improve > > > > tests) > > > > > should be merged to the `2.6` branch. If you think you've > identified a > > > > new > > > > > blocker issue or believe another existing issue should be treated > as a > > > > > blocker for 2.6.0, please mark the issue's `fix version` as `2.6.0` > > > _and_ > > > > > respond to this thread with details, and I will work with you to > > > > determine > > > > > whether it is indeed a blocker. > > > > > > > > > > As always, let me know here if you have any questions/concerns. > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > Randall > > > > > > > > > > [1] > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/KAFKA/versions/12346918 > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 8:27 AM Mario Molina > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Randal, > > > > > > > > > > > > Ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9018 is not a > > > > blocker > > > > > > so > > > > > > it can be moved to the 2.7.0 version. > > > > > > > > > > > > Mario > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 2.6.0 release
Hi Randall, While developing system tests, I've just unearthed a new 2.6 regression: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10247 I've got a PR in progress. Hoping to finish it up today: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8994 Sorry for the trouble, -John On Mon, Jun 29, 2020, at 09:29, Randall Hauch wrote: > Thanks for raising this, David. I agree it makes sense to include this fix > in 2.6, so I've adjusted the "Fix Version(s)" field to include '2.6.0'. > > Best regards, > > Randall > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 8:25 AM David Jacot wrote: > > > Hi Randall, > > > > We have discovered an annoying issue that we introduced in 2.5: > > > > Describing topics with the command line tool fails if the user does not > > have the > > privileges to access the ListPartitionReassignments API. I believe that > > this is the > > case for most non-admin users. > > > > I propose to include the fix in 2.6. The fix is trivial so low risk. What > > do you think? > > > > JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10212 > > PR: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8947 > > > > Best, > > David > > > > On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 4:39 AM John Roesler wrote: > > > > > Hi Randall, > > > > > > I neglected to notify this thread when I merged the fix for > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10185 > > > on June 19th. I'm sorry about that oversight. It is marked with > > > a fix version of 2.6.0. > > > > > > On a side node, I have a fix for KAFKA-10173, which I'm merging > > > and backporting right now. > > > > > > Thanks for managing the release, > > > -John > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020, at 10:23, Randall Hauch wrote: > > > > Thanks for the update, folks! > > > > > > > > Based upon Jira [1], we currently have 4 issues that are considered > > > > blockers for the 2.6.0 release and production of RCs: > > > > > > > >- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10134 - High CPU > > issue > > > >during rebalance in Kafka consumer after upgrading to 2.5 > > (unassigned) > > > >- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10143 - Can no longer > > > >change replication throttle with reassignment tool (Jason G) > > > >- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10166 - Excessive > > > >TaskCorruptedException seen in testing (Sophie, Bruno) > > > >- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10173 > > > >- BufferUnderflowException during Kafka Streams Upgrade (John R) > > > > > > > > and one critical issue that may be a regression that at this time will > > > not > > > > block production of RCs: > > > > > > > >- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10017 - Flaky Test > > > >EosBetaUpgradeIntegrationTest.shouldUpgradeFromEosAlphaToEosBeta > > > (Matthias) > > > > > > > > and one build/release issue we'd like to fix if possible but will not > > > block > > > > RCs or the release: > > > > > > > >- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9381 > > > >- kafka-streams-scala: Javadocs + Scaladocs not published on maven > > > central > > > >(me) > > > > > > > > I'm working with the assignees and reporters of these issues (via > > > comments > > > > on the issues) to identify an ETA and to track progress. Anyone is > > > welcome > > > > to chime in on those issues. > > > > > > > > At this time, no other changes (other than PRs that only fix/improve > > > tests) > > > > should be merged to the `2.6` branch. If you think you've identified a > > > new > > > > blocker issue or believe another existing issue should be treated as a > > > > blocker for 2.6.0, please mark the issue's `fix version` as `2.6.0` > > _and_ > > > > respond to this thread with details, and I will work with you to > > > determine > > > > whether it is indeed a blocker. > > > > > > > > As always, let me know here if you have any questions/concerns. > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > Randall > > > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/KAFKA/versions/12346918 > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 8:27 AM Mario Molina > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Randal, > > > > > > > > > > Ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9018 is not a > > > blocker > > > > > so > > > > > it can be moved to the 2.7.0 version. > > > > > > > > > > Mario > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 20:22, Boyang Chen < > > reluctanthero...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hey Randal, > > > > > > > > > > > > There was another spotted blocker: > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10173 > > > > > > As of current, John is working on a fix. > > > > > > > > > > > > Boyang > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 4:08 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman < > > > sop...@confluent.io > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just a heads up that we discovered a new blocker. The fix is > > pretty > > > > > > > straightforward > > > > > > > and there's already a PR for it so it should be resolved quickly. >
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 2.6.0 release
Thanks for raising this, David. I agree it makes sense to include this fix in 2.6, so I've adjusted the "Fix Version(s)" field to include '2.6.0'. Best regards, Randall On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 8:25 AM David Jacot wrote: > Hi Randall, > > We have discovered an annoying issue that we introduced in 2.5: > > Describing topics with the command line tool fails if the user does not > have the > privileges to access the ListPartitionReassignments API. I believe that > this is the > case for most non-admin users. > > I propose to include the fix in 2.6. The fix is trivial so low risk. What > do you think? > > JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10212 > PR: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8947 > > Best, > David > > On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 4:39 AM John Roesler wrote: > > > Hi Randall, > > > > I neglected to notify this thread when I merged the fix for > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10185 > > on June 19th. I'm sorry about that oversight. It is marked with > > a fix version of 2.6.0. > > > > On a side node, I have a fix for KAFKA-10173, which I'm merging > > and backporting right now. > > > > Thanks for managing the release, > > -John > > > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020, at 10:23, Randall Hauch wrote: > > > Thanks for the update, folks! > > > > > > Based upon Jira [1], we currently have 4 issues that are considered > > > blockers for the 2.6.0 release and production of RCs: > > > > > >- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10134 - High CPU > issue > > >during rebalance in Kafka consumer after upgrading to 2.5 > (unassigned) > > >- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10143 - Can no longer > > >change replication throttle with reassignment tool (Jason G) > > >- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10166 - Excessive > > >TaskCorruptedException seen in testing (Sophie, Bruno) > > >- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10173 > > >- BufferUnderflowException during Kafka Streams Upgrade (John R) > > > > > > and one critical issue that may be a regression that at this time will > > not > > > block production of RCs: > > > > > >- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10017 - Flaky Test > > >EosBetaUpgradeIntegrationTest.shouldUpgradeFromEosAlphaToEosBeta > > (Matthias) > > > > > > and one build/release issue we'd like to fix if possible but will not > > block > > > RCs or the release: > > > > > >- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9381 > > >- kafka-streams-scala: Javadocs + Scaladocs not published on maven > > central > > >(me) > > > > > > I'm working with the assignees and reporters of these issues (via > > comments > > > on the issues) to identify an ETA and to track progress. Anyone is > > welcome > > > to chime in on those issues. > > > > > > At this time, no other changes (other than PRs that only fix/improve > > tests) > > > should be merged to the `2.6` branch. If you think you've identified a > > new > > > blocker issue or believe another existing issue should be treated as a > > > blocker for 2.6.0, please mark the issue's `fix version` as `2.6.0` > _and_ > > > respond to this thread with details, and I will work with you to > > determine > > > whether it is indeed a blocker. > > > > > > As always, let me know here if you have any questions/concerns. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > Randall > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/KAFKA/versions/12346918 > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 8:27 AM Mario Molina > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Randal, > > > > > > > > Ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9018 is not a > > blocker > > > > so > > > > it can be moved to the 2.7.0 version. > > > > > > > > Mario > > > > > > > > On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 20:22, Boyang Chen < > reluctanthero...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hey Randal, > > > > > > > > > > There was another spotted blocker: > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10173 > > > > > As of current, John is working on a fix. > > > > > > > > > > Boyang > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 4:08 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman < > > sop...@confluent.io > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hey all, > > > > > > > > > > > > Just a heads up that we discovered a new blocker. The fix is > pretty > > > > > > straightforward > > > > > > and there's already a PR for it so it should be resolved quickly. > > > > > > > > > > > > Here's the ticket: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10198 > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 12:52 PM Randall Hauch > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, Kowshik, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the update on KIP-584. This is listed on the > > "Postponed" > > > > > > section > > > > > > > of the AK 2.6.0 release plan ( > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > > > > > > ). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 2.6.0 release
Hi Randall, We have discovered an annoying issue that we introduced in 2.5: Describing topics with the command line tool fails if the user does not have the privileges to access the ListPartitionReassignments API. I believe that this is the case for most non-admin users. I propose to include the fix in 2.6. The fix is trivial so low risk. What do you think? JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10212 PR: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8947 Best, David On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 4:39 AM John Roesler wrote: > Hi Randall, > > I neglected to notify this thread when I merged the fix for > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10185 > on June 19th. I'm sorry about that oversight. It is marked with > a fix version of 2.6.0. > > On a side node, I have a fix for KAFKA-10173, which I'm merging > and backporting right now. > > Thanks for managing the release, > -John > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020, at 10:23, Randall Hauch wrote: > > Thanks for the update, folks! > > > > Based upon Jira [1], we currently have 4 issues that are considered > > blockers for the 2.6.0 release and production of RCs: > > > >- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10134 - High CPU issue > >during rebalance in Kafka consumer after upgrading to 2.5 (unassigned) > >- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10143 - Can no longer > >change replication throttle with reassignment tool (Jason G) > >- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10166 - Excessive > >TaskCorruptedException seen in testing (Sophie, Bruno) > >- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10173 > >- BufferUnderflowException during Kafka Streams Upgrade (John R) > > > > and one critical issue that may be a regression that at this time will > not > > block production of RCs: > > > >- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10017 - Flaky Test > >EosBetaUpgradeIntegrationTest.shouldUpgradeFromEosAlphaToEosBeta > (Matthias) > > > > and one build/release issue we'd like to fix if possible but will not > block > > RCs or the release: > > > >- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9381 > >- kafka-streams-scala: Javadocs + Scaladocs not published on maven > central > >(me) > > > > I'm working with the assignees and reporters of these issues (via > comments > > on the issues) to identify an ETA and to track progress. Anyone is > welcome > > to chime in on those issues. > > > > At this time, no other changes (other than PRs that only fix/improve > tests) > > should be merged to the `2.6` branch. If you think you've identified a > new > > blocker issue or believe another existing issue should be treated as a > > blocker for 2.6.0, please mark the issue's `fix version` as `2.6.0` _and_ > > respond to this thread with details, and I will work with you to > determine > > whether it is indeed a blocker. > > > > As always, let me know here if you have any questions/concerns. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Randall > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/KAFKA/versions/12346918 > > > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 8:27 AM Mario Molina wrote: > > > > > Hi Randal, > > > > > > Ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9018 is not a > blocker > > > so > > > it can be moved to the 2.7.0 version. > > > > > > Mario > > > > > > On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 20:22, Boyang Chen > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hey Randal, > > > > > > > > There was another spotted blocker: > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10173 > > > > As of current, John is working on a fix. > > > > > > > > Boyang > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 4:08 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman < > sop...@confluent.io > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hey all, > > > > > > > > > > Just a heads up that we discovered a new blocker. The fix is pretty > > > > > straightforward > > > > > and there's already a PR for it so it should be resolved quickly. > > > > > > > > > > Here's the ticket: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10198 > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 12:52 PM Randall Hauch > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, Kowshik, > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the update on KIP-584. This is listed on the > "Postponed" > > > > > section > > > > > > of the AK 2.6.0 release plan ( > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > > > > > ). > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > Randall > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 4:51 PM Kowshik Prakasam < > > > > kpraka...@confluent.io > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Randall, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We have to remove KIP-584 from the release plan, as this item > will > > > > not > > > > > be > > > > > > > completed for 2.6 release (although KIP is accepted). We plan > to > > > > > include > > > > > > it > > > > > > > in a next release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > Kowshik > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 2.6.0 release
Hi Randall, I neglected to notify this thread when I merged the fix for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10185 on June 19th. I'm sorry about that oversight. It is marked with a fix version of 2.6.0. On a side node, I have a fix for KAFKA-10173, which I'm merging and backporting right now. Thanks for managing the release, -John On Thu, Jun 25, 2020, at 10:23, Randall Hauch wrote: > Thanks for the update, folks! > > Based upon Jira [1], we currently have 4 issues that are considered > blockers for the 2.6.0 release and production of RCs: > >- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10134 - High CPU issue >during rebalance in Kafka consumer after upgrading to 2.5 (unassigned) >- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10143 - Can no longer >change replication throttle with reassignment tool (Jason G) >- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10166 - Excessive >TaskCorruptedException seen in testing (Sophie, Bruno) >- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10173 >- BufferUnderflowException during Kafka Streams Upgrade (John R) > > and one critical issue that may be a regression that at this time will not > block production of RCs: > >- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10017 - Flaky Test >EosBetaUpgradeIntegrationTest.shouldUpgradeFromEosAlphaToEosBeta (Matthias) > > and one build/release issue we'd like to fix if possible but will not block > RCs or the release: > >- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9381 >- kafka-streams-scala: Javadocs + Scaladocs not published on maven central >(me) > > I'm working with the assignees and reporters of these issues (via comments > on the issues) to identify an ETA and to track progress. Anyone is welcome > to chime in on those issues. > > At this time, no other changes (other than PRs that only fix/improve tests) > should be merged to the `2.6` branch. If you think you've identified a new > blocker issue or believe another existing issue should be treated as a > blocker for 2.6.0, please mark the issue's `fix version` as `2.6.0` _and_ > respond to this thread with details, and I will work with you to determine > whether it is indeed a blocker. > > As always, let me know here if you have any questions/concerns. > > Best regards, > > Randall > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/KAFKA/versions/12346918 > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 8:27 AM Mario Molina wrote: > > > Hi Randal, > > > > Ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9018 is not a blocker > > so > > it can be moved to the 2.7.0 version. > > > > Mario > > > > On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 20:22, Boyang Chen > > wrote: > > > > > Hey Randal, > > > > > > There was another spotted blocker: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10173 > > > As of current, John is working on a fix. > > > > > > Boyang > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 4:08 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hey all, > > > > > > > > Just a heads up that we discovered a new blocker. The fix is pretty > > > > straightforward > > > > and there's already a PR for it so it should be resolved quickly. > > > > > > > > Here's the ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10198 > > > > > > > > On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 12:52 PM Randall Hauch > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, Kowshik, > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the update on KIP-584. This is listed on the "Postponed" > > > > section > > > > > of the AK 2.6.0 release plan ( > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > > > > ). > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > Randall > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 4:51 PM Kowshik Prakasam < > > > kpraka...@confluent.io > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Randall, > > > > > > > > > > > > We have to remove KIP-584 from the release plan, as this item will > > > not > > > > be > > > > > > completed for 2.6 release (although KIP is accepted). We plan to > > > > include > > > > > it > > > > > > in a next release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Kowshik > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:43 AM Maulin Vasavada < > > > > > > maulin.vasav...@gmail.com> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Randall Hauch > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can we add KIP-519 to 2.6? It was merged to Trunk already in > > April > > > - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=128650952 > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > Maulin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:01 AM Randall Hauch > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here's an update on the AK 2.6.0 release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Code freeze was Wednesday, and the release plan [1] has been > > > > updated > > > > > to > > > > > > > > reflect all of the KIPs that made the release. We
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 2.6.0 release
Thanks for the update, folks! Based upon Jira [1], we currently have 4 issues that are considered blockers for the 2.6.0 release and production of RCs: - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10134 - High CPU issue during rebalance in Kafka consumer after upgrading to 2.5 (unassigned) - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10143 - Can no longer change replication throttle with reassignment tool (Jason G) - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10166 - Excessive TaskCorruptedException seen in testing (Sophie, Bruno) - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10173 - BufferUnderflowException during Kafka Streams Upgrade (John R) and one critical issue that may be a regression that at this time will not block production of RCs: - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10017 - Flaky Test EosBetaUpgradeIntegrationTest.shouldUpgradeFromEosAlphaToEosBeta (Matthias) and one build/release issue we'd like to fix if possible but will not block RCs or the release: - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9381 - kafka-streams-scala: Javadocs + Scaladocs not published on maven central (me) I'm working with the assignees and reporters of these issues (via comments on the issues) to identify an ETA and to track progress. Anyone is welcome to chime in on those issues. At this time, no other changes (other than PRs that only fix/improve tests) should be merged to the `2.6` branch. If you think you've identified a new blocker issue or believe another existing issue should be treated as a blocker for 2.6.0, please mark the issue's `fix version` as `2.6.0` _and_ respond to this thread with details, and I will work with you to determine whether it is indeed a blocker. As always, let me know here if you have any questions/concerns. Best regards, Randall [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/KAFKA/versions/12346918 On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 8:27 AM Mario Molina wrote: > Hi Randal, > > Ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9018 is not a blocker > so > it can be moved to the 2.7.0 version. > > Mario > > On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 20:22, Boyang Chen > wrote: > > > Hey Randal, > > > > There was another spotted blocker: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10173 > > As of current, John is working on a fix. > > > > Boyang > > > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 4:08 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman > > > wrote: > > > > > Hey all, > > > > > > Just a heads up that we discovered a new blocker. The fix is pretty > > > straightforward > > > and there's already a PR for it so it should be resolved quickly. > > > > > > Here's the ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10198 > > > > > > On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 12:52 PM Randall Hauch > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, Kowshik, > > > > > > > > Thanks for the update on KIP-584. This is listed on the "Postponed" > > > section > > > > of the AK 2.6.0 release plan ( > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > > > ). > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > Randall > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 4:51 PM Kowshik Prakasam < > > kpraka...@confluent.io > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Randall, > > > > > > > > > > We have to remove KIP-584 from the release plan, as this item will > > not > > > be > > > > > completed for 2.6 release (although KIP is accepted). We plan to > > > include > > > > it > > > > > in a next release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > Kowshik > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:43 AM Maulin Vasavada < > > > > > maulin.vasav...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Randall Hauch > > > > > > > > > > > > Can we add KIP-519 to 2.6? It was merged to Trunk already in > April > > - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=128650952 > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Maulin > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:01 AM Randall Hauch > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here's an update on the AK 2.6.0 release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Code freeze was Wednesday, and the release plan [1] has been > > > updated > > > > to > > > > > > > reflect all of the KIPs that made the release. We've also cut > the > > > > `2.6` > > > > > > > branch that we'll use for the release; see separate email > > > announcing > > > > > the > > > > > > > new branch. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The next important date for the 2.6.0 release is CODE FREEZE on > > > JUNE > > > > > 10, > > > > > > > and until that date all bug fixes are still welcome on the > > release > > > > > > branch. > > > > > > > But after that, only blocker bugs can be merged to the release > > > > branch. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me or > > (better > > > > > yet) > > > > > > > reply to this thread. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, and best regards! > > > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 2.6.0 release
Hi Randal, Ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9018 is not a blocker so it can be moved to the 2.7.0 version. Mario On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 20:22, Boyang Chen wrote: > Hey Randal, > > There was another spotted blocker: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10173 > As of current, John is working on a fix. > > Boyang > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 4:08 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman > wrote: > > > Hey all, > > > > Just a heads up that we discovered a new blocker. The fix is pretty > > straightforward > > and there's already a PR for it so it should be resolved quickly. > > > > Here's the ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10198 > > > > On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 12:52 PM Randall Hauch wrote: > > > > > Hi, Kowshik, > > > > > > Thanks for the update on KIP-584. This is listed on the "Postponed" > > section > > > of the AK 2.6.0 release plan ( > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > > ). > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > Randall > > > > > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 4:51 PM Kowshik Prakasam < > kpraka...@confluent.io > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Randall, > > > > > > > > We have to remove KIP-584 from the release plan, as this item will > not > > be > > > > completed for 2.6 release (although KIP is accepted). We plan to > > include > > > it > > > > in a next release. > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Kowshik > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:43 AM Maulin Vasavada < > > > > maulin.vasav...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Randall Hauch > > > > > > > > > > Can we add KIP-519 to 2.6? It was merged to Trunk already in April > - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=128650952 > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > Maulin > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:01 AM Randall Hauch > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Here's an update on the AK 2.6.0 release. > > > > > > > > > > > > Code freeze was Wednesday, and the release plan [1] has been > > updated > > > to > > > > > > reflect all of the KIPs that made the release. We've also cut the > > > `2.6` > > > > > > branch that we'll use for the release; see separate email > > announcing > > > > the > > > > > > new branch. > > > > > > > > > > > > The next important date for the 2.6.0 release is CODE FREEZE on > > JUNE > > > > 10, > > > > > > and until that date all bug fixes are still welcome on the > release > > > > > branch. > > > > > > But after that, only blocker bugs can be merged to the release > > > branch. > > > > > > > > > > > > If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me or > (better > > > > yet) > > > > > > reply to this thread. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, and best regards! > > > > > > > > > > > > Randall > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] AK 2.6.0 Release Plan: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 5:53 PM Matthias J. Sax < > mj...@apache.org> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Randall! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I added missing KIP-594. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For the postponed KIP section: I removed KIP-441 and KIP-444 as > > > both > > > > > are > > > > > > > completed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/27/20 2:31 PM, Randall Hauch wrote: > > > > > > > > Hey everyone, just a quick update on the 2.6.0 release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Based on the release plan ( > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > > > > > > ), > > > > > > > > today (May 27) is feature freeze. Any major feature work that > > is > > > > not > > > > > > > > already complete will need to push out to the next release > > > (either > > > > > 2.7 > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > 3.0). There are a few PRs for KIPs that are nearing > completion, > > > and > > > > > > we're > > > > > > > > having some Jenkins build issues. I will send another email > > later > > > > > today > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > early tomorrow with an update, and I plan to cut the release > > > branch > > > > > > > shortly > > > > > > > > thereafter. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have also updated the list of planned KIPs on the release > > plan > > > > > page ( > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > > > > > > ), > > > > > > > > and I've moved to the "Postponed" table any KIP that looks > like > > > it > > > > is > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > going to be complete today. If any KIP is in the wrong table, > > > > please > > > > > > let > > > > > > > me > > > > > > > > know. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 2.6.0 release
Hey Randal, There was another spotted blocker: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10173 As of current, John is working on a fix. Boyang On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 4:08 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman wrote: > Hey all, > > Just a heads up that we discovered a new blocker. The fix is pretty > straightforward > and there's already a PR for it so it should be resolved quickly. > > Here's the ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10198 > > On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 12:52 PM Randall Hauch wrote: > > > Hi, Kowshik, > > > > Thanks for the update on KIP-584. This is listed on the "Postponed" > section > > of the AK 2.6.0 release plan ( > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > ). > > > > Best regards, > > > > Randall > > > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 4:51 PM Kowshik Prakasam > > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Randall, > > > > > > We have to remove KIP-584 from the release plan, as this item will not > be > > > completed for 2.6 release (although KIP is accepted). We plan to > include > > it > > > in a next release. > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Kowshik > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:43 AM Maulin Vasavada < > > > maulin.vasav...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Randall Hauch > > > > > > > > Can we add KIP-519 to 2.6? It was merged to Trunk already in April - > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=128650952 > > > > . > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Maulin > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:01 AM Randall Hauch > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Here's an update on the AK 2.6.0 release. > > > > > > > > > > Code freeze was Wednesday, and the release plan [1] has been > updated > > to > > > > > reflect all of the KIPs that made the release. We've also cut the > > `2.6` > > > > > branch that we'll use for the release; see separate email > announcing > > > the > > > > > new branch. > > > > > > > > > > The next important date for the 2.6.0 release is CODE FREEZE on > JUNE > > > 10, > > > > > and until that date all bug fixes are still welcome on the release > > > > branch. > > > > > But after that, only blocker bugs can be merged to the release > > branch. > > > > > > > > > > If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me or (better > > > yet) > > > > > reply to this thread. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, and best regards! > > > > > > > > > > Randall > > > > > > > > > > [1] AK 2.6.0 Release Plan: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 5:53 PM Matthias J. Sax > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Randall! > > > > > > > > > > > > I added missing KIP-594. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For the postponed KIP section: I removed KIP-441 and KIP-444 as > > both > > > > are > > > > > > completed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/27/20 2:31 PM, Randall Hauch wrote: > > > > > > > Hey everyone, just a quick update on the 2.6.0 release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Based on the release plan ( > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > > > > > ), > > > > > > > today (May 27) is feature freeze. Any major feature work that > is > > > not > > > > > > > already complete will need to push out to the next release > > (either > > > > 2.7 > > > > > or > > > > > > > 3.0). There are a few PRs for KIPs that are nearing completion, > > and > > > > > we're > > > > > > > having some Jenkins build issues. I will send another email > later > > > > today > > > > > > or > > > > > > > early tomorrow with an update, and I plan to cut the release > > branch > > > > > > shortly > > > > > > > thereafter. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have also updated the list of planned KIPs on the release > plan > > > > page ( > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > > > > > ), > > > > > > > and I've moved to the "Postponed" table any KIP that looks like > > it > > > is > > > > > not > > > > > > > going to be complete today. If any KIP is in the wrong table, > > > please > > > > > let > > > > > > me > > > > > > > know. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to > reply > > to > > > > > this > > > > > > > thread. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, and best regards! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Randall > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 2:16 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman < > > > > > sop...@confluent.io > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Hey Randall, > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Can you also add KIP-613 which was accepted yesterday? > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Thanks! > > > > > > >> Sophie > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 6:47 AM Randall Hauch < > rha...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 2.6.0 release
Hey all, Just a heads up that we discovered a new blocker. The fix is pretty straightforward and there's already a PR for it so it should be resolved quickly. Here's the ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10198 On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 12:52 PM Randall Hauch wrote: > Hi, Kowshik, > > Thanks for the update on KIP-584. This is listed on the "Postponed" section > of the AK 2.6.0 release plan ( > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > ). > > Best regards, > > Randall > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 4:51 PM Kowshik Prakasam > wrote: > > > Hi Randall, > > > > We have to remove KIP-584 from the release plan, as this item will not be > > completed for 2.6 release (although KIP is accepted). We plan to include > it > > in a next release. > > > > > > Cheers, > > Kowshik > > > > > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:43 AM Maulin Vasavada < > > maulin.vasav...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Randall Hauch > > > > > > Can we add KIP-519 to 2.6? It was merged to Trunk already in April - > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=128650952 > > > . > > > > > > Thanks > > > Maulin > > > > > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:01 AM Randall Hauch > wrote: > > > > > > > Here's an update on the AK 2.6.0 release. > > > > > > > > Code freeze was Wednesday, and the release plan [1] has been updated > to > > > > reflect all of the KIPs that made the release. We've also cut the > `2.6` > > > > branch that we'll use for the release; see separate email announcing > > the > > > > new branch. > > > > > > > > The next important date for the 2.6.0 release is CODE FREEZE on JUNE > > 10, > > > > and until that date all bug fixes are still welcome on the release > > > branch. > > > > But after that, only blocker bugs can be merged to the release > branch. > > > > > > > > If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me or (better > > yet) > > > > reply to this thread. > > > > > > > > Thanks, and best regards! > > > > > > > > Randall > > > > > > > > [1] AK 2.6.0 Release Plan: > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 5:53 PM Matthias J. Sax > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Thanks Randall! > > > > > > > > > > I added missing KIP-594. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For the postponed KIP section: I removed KIP-441 and KIP-444 as > both > > > are > > > > > completed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > > > > > > > On 5/27/20 2:31 PM, Randall Hauch wrote: > > > > > > Hey everyone, just a quick update on the 2.6.0 release. > > > > > > > > > > > > Based on the release plan ( > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > > > > ), > > > > > > today (May 27) is feature freeze. Any major feature work that is > > not > > > > > > already complete will need to push out to the next release > (either > > > 2.7 > > > > or > > > > > > 3.0). There are a few PRs for KIPs that are nearing completion, > and > > > > we're > > > > > > having some Jenkins build issues. I will send another email later > > > today > > > > > or > > > > > > early tomorrow with an update, and I plan to cut the release > branch > > > > > shortly > > > > > > thereafter. > > > > > > > > > > > > I have also updated the list of planned KIPs on the release plan > > > page ( > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > > > > ), > > > > > > and I've moved to the "Postponed" table any KIP that looks like > it > > is > > > > not > > > > > > going to be complete today. If any KIP is in the wrong table, > > please > > > > let > > > > > me > > > > > > know. > > > > > > > > > > > > If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to reply > to > > > > this > > > > > > thread. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, and best regards! > > > > > > > > > > > > Randall > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 2:16 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman < > > > > sop...@confluent.io > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> Hey Randall, > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Can you also add KIP-613 which was accepted yesterday? > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Thanks! > > > > > >> Sophie > > > > > >> > > > > > >> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 6:47 AM Randall Hauch > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > >>> Hi, Tom. I saw last night that the KIP had enough votes before > > > > today’s > > > > > >>> deadline and I will add it to the roadmap today. Thanks for > > driving > > > > > this! > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 6:18 AM Tom Bentley < > tbent...@redhat.com > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >>> > > > > > Hi Randall, > > > > > > > > > > Can we add KIP-585? (I'm not quite sure of the protocol here, > > but > > > > > >> thought > > > > > it better to ask than to just add it myself). > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 2.6.0 release
Thanks Randall Hauch! On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 12:52 PM Randall Hauch wrote: > Hi, Kowshik, > > Thanks for the update on KIP-584. This is listed on the "Postponed" section > of the AK 2.6.0 release plan ( > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > ). > > Best regards, > > Randall > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 4:51 PM Kowshik Prakasam > wrote: > > > Hi Randall, > > > > We have to remove KIP-584 from the release plan, as this item will not be > > completed for 2.6 release (although KIP is accepted). We plan to include > it > > in a next release. > > > > > > Cheers, > > Kowshik > > > > > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:43 AM Maulin Vasavada < > > maulin.vasav...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Randall Hauch > > > > > > Can we add KIP-519 to 2.6? It was merged to Trunk already in April - > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=128650952 > > > . > > > > > > Thanks > > > Maulin > > > > > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:01 AM Randall Hauch > wrote: > > > > > > > Here's an update on the AK 2.6.0 release. > > > > > > > > Code freeze was Wednesday, and the release plan [1] has been updated > to > > > > reflect all of the KIPs that made the release. We've also cut the > `2.6` > > > > branch that we'll use for the release; see separate email announcing > > the > > > > new branch. > > > > > > > > The next important date for the 2.6.0 release is CODE FREEZE on JUNE > > 10, > > > > and until that date all bug fixes are still welcome on the release > > > branch. > > > > But after that, only blocker bugs can be merged to the release > branch. > > > > > > > > If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me or (better > > yet) > > > > reply to this thread. > > > > > > > > Thanks, and best regards! > > > > > > > > Randall > > > > > > > > [1] AK 2.6.0 Release Plan: > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 5:53 PM Matthias J. Sax > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Thanks Randall! > > > > > > > > > > I added missing KIP-594. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For the postponed KIP section: I removed KIP-441 and KIP-444 as > both > > > are > > > > > completed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > > > > > > > On 5/27/20 2:31 PM, Randall Hauch wrote: > > > > > > Hey everyone, just a quick update on the 2.6.0 release. > > > > > > > > > > > > Based on the release plan ( > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > > > > ), > > > > > > today (May 27) is feature freeze. Any major feature work that is > > not > > > > > > already complete will need to push out to the next release > (either > > > 2.7 > > > > or > > > > > > 3.0). There are a few PRs for KIPs that are nearing completion, > and > > > > we're > > > > > > having some Jenkins build issues. I will send another email later > > > today > > > > > or > > > > > > early tomorrow with an update, and I plan to cut the release > branch > > > > > shortly > > > > > > thereafter. > > > > > > > > > > > > I have also updated the list of planned KIPs on the release plan > > > page ( > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > > > > ), > > > > > > and I've moved to the "Postponed" table any KIP that looks like > it > > is > > > > not > > > > > > going to be complete today. If any KIP is in the wrong table, > > please > > > > let > > > > > me > > > > > > know. > > > > > > > > > > > > If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to reply > to > > > > this > > > > > > thread. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, and best regards! > > > > > > > > > > > > Randall > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 2:16 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman < > > > > sop...@confluent.io > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> Hey Randall, > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Can you also add KIP-613 which was accepted yesterday? > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Thanks! > > > > > >> Sophie > > > > > >> > > > > > >> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 6:47 AM Randall Hauch > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > >>> Hi, Tom. I saw last night that the KIP had enough votes before > > > > today’s > > > > > >>> deadline and I will add it to the roadmap today. Thanks for > > driving > > > > > this! > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 6:18 AM Tom Bentley < > tbent...@redhat.com > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >>> > > > > > Hi Randall, > > > > > > > > > > Can we add KIP-585? (I'm not quite sure of the protocol here, > > but > > > > > >> thought > > > > > it better to ask than to just add it myself). > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > Tom > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 6:54 PM Randall Hauch < > rha...@apache.org > > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Greetings! > > > > > > > > > > > > I'
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 2.6.0 release
Hi, Kowshik, Thanks for the update on KIP-584. This is listed on the "Postponed" section of the AK 2.6.0 release plan ( https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430). Best regards, Randall On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 4:51 PM Kowshik Prakasam wrote: > Hi Randall, > > We have to remove KIP-584 from the release plan, as this item will not be > completed for 2.6 release (although KIP is accepted). We plan to include it > in a next release. > > > Cheers, > Kowshik > > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:43 AM Maulin Vasavada < > maulin.vasav...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi Randall Hauch > > > > Can we add KIP-519 to 2.6? It was merged to Trunk already in April - > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=128650952 > > . > > > > Thanks > > Maulin > > > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:01 AM Randall Hauch wrote: > > > > > Here's an update on the AK 2.6.0 release. > > > > > > Code freeze was Wednesday, and the release plan [1] has been updated to > > > reflect all of the KIPs that made the release. We've also cut the `2.6` > > > branch that we'll use for the release; see separate email announcing > the > > > new branch. > > > > > > The next important date for the 2.6.0 release is CODE FREEZE on JUNE > 10, > > > and until that date all bug fixes are still welcome on the release > > branch. > > > But after that, only blocker bugs can be merged to the release branch. > > > > > > If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me or (better > yet) > > > reply to this thread. > > > > > > Thanks, and best regards! > > > > > > Randall > > > > > > [1] AK 2.6.0 Release Plan: > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 5:53 PM Matthias J. Sax > > wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks Randall! > > > > > > > > I added missing KIP-594. > > > > > > > > > > > > For the postponed KIP section: I removed KIP-441 and KIP-444 as both > > are > > > > completed. > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > > > > > On 5/27/20 2:31 PM, Randall Hauch wrote: > > > > > Hey everyone, just a quick update on the 2.6.0 release. > > > > > > > > > > Based on the release plan ( > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > > > ), > > > > > today (May 27) is feature freeze. Any major feature work that is > not > > > > > already complete will need to push out to the next release (either > > 2.7 > > > or > > > > > 3.0). There are a few PRs for KIPs that are nearing completion, and > > > we're > > > > > having some Jenkins build issues. I will send another email later > > today > > > > or > > > > > early tomorrow with an update, and I plan to cut the release branch > > > > shortly > > > > > thereafter. > > > > > > > > > > I have also updated the list of planned KIPs on the release plan > > page ( > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > > > ), > > > > > and I've moved to the "Postponed" table any KIP that looks like it > is > > > not > > > > > going to be complete today. If any KIP is in the wrong table, > please > > > let > > > > me > > > > > know. > > > > > > > > > > If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to reply to > > > this > > > > > thread. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, and best regards! > > > > > > > > > > Randall > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 2:16 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman < > > > sop...@confluent.io > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> Hey Randall, > > > > >> > > > > >> Can you also add KIP-613 which was accepted yesterday? > > > > >> > > > > >> Thanks! > > > > >> Sophie > > > > >> > > > > >> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 6:47 AM Randall Hauch > > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >>> Hi, Tom. I saw last night that the KIP had enough votes before > > > today’s > > > > >>> deadline and I will add it to the roadmap today. Thanks for > driving > > > > this! > > > > >>> > > > > >>> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 6:18 AM Tom Bentley > > > > > wrote: > > > > >>> > > > > Hi Randall, > > > > > > > > Can we add KIP-585? (I'm not quite sure of the protocol here, > but > > > > >> thought > > > > it better to ask than to just add it myself). > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Tom > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 6:54 PM Randall Hauch > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Greetings! > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to volunteer to be release manager for the next > > time-based > > > > feature > > > > > release which will be 2.6.0. I've published a release plan at > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > > > > , > > > > > and have included all of the KIPs that are currently approved > or > > > > >>> actively > > > > > in discussion (though I'm happy to adjust as necessary). > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 2.6.0 release
Hi, Maulin. Thanks for pointing out that KIP-519 was already merged in April. I've corrected the https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Kafka+Improvement+Proposals page to reflect this, and have added it to the AK 2.6.0 release plan. Best regards, Randall On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 1:43 PM Maulin Vasavada wrote: > Hi Randall Hauch > > Can we add KIP-519 to 2.6? It was merged to Trunk already in April - > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=128650952 > . > > Thanks > Maulin > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:01 AM Randall Hauch wrote: > > > Here's an update on the AK 2.6.0 release. > > > > Code freeze was Wednesday, and the release plan [1] has been updated to > > reflect all of the KIPs that made the release. We've also cut the `2.6` > > branch that we'll use for the release; see separate email announcing the > > new branch. > > > > The next important date for the 2.6.0 release is CODE FREEZE on JUNE 10, > > and until that date all bug fixes are still welcome on the release > branch. > > But after that, only blocker bugs can be merged to the release branch. > > > > If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me or (better yet) > > reply to this thread. > > > > Thanks, and best regards! > > > > Randall > > > > [1] AK 2.6.0 Release Plan: > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > > > > > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 5:53 PM Matthias J. Sax > wrote: > > > > > Thanks Randall! > > > > > > I added missing KIP-594. > > > > > > > > > For the postponed KIP section: I removed KIP-441 and KIP-444 as both > are > > > completed. > > > > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > > > On 5/27/20 2:31 PM, Randall Hauch wrote: > > > > Hey everyone, just a quick update on the 2.6.0 release. > > > > > > > > Based on the release plan ( > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > > ), > > > > today (May 27) is feature freeze. Any major feature work that is not > > > > already complete will need to push out to the next release (either > 2.7 > > or > > > > 3.0). There are a few PRs for KIPs that are nearing completion, and > > we're > > > > having some Jenkins build issues. I will send another email later > today > > > or > > > > early tomorrow with an update, and I plan to cut the release branch > > > shortly > > > > thereafter. > > > > > > > > I have also updated the list of planned KIPs on the release plan > page ( > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > > ), > > > > and I've moved to the "Postponed" table any KIP that looks like it is > > not > > > > going to be complete today. If any KIP is in the wrong table, please > > let > > > me > > > > know. > > > > > > > > If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to reply to > > this > > > > thread. > > > > > > > > Thanks, and best regards! > > > > > > > > Randall > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 2:16 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman < > > sop...@confluent.io > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Hey Randall, > > > >> > > > >> Can you also add KIP-613 which was accepted yesterday? > > > >> > > > >> Thanks! > > > >> Sophie > > > >> > > > >> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 6:47 AM Randall Hauch > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> Hi, Tom. I saw last night that the KIP had enough votes before > > today’s > > > >>> deadline and I will add it to the roadmap today. Thanks for driving > > > this! > > > >>> > > > >>> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 6:18 AM Tom Bentley > > > wrote: > > > >>> > > > Hi Randall, > > > > > > Can we add KIP-585? (I'm not quite sure of the protocol here, but > > > >> thought > > > it better to ask than to just add it myself). > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Tom > > > > > > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 6:54 PM Randall Hauch > > > >> wrote: > > > > > > > Greetings! > > > > > > > > I'd like to volunteer to be release manager for the next > time-based > > > feature > > > > release which will be 2.6.0. I've published a release plan at > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > > > , > > > > and have included all of the KIPs that are currently approved or > > > >>> actively > > > > in discussion (though I'm happy to adjust as necessary). > > > > > > > > To stay on our time-based cadence, the KIP freeze is on May 20 > > with a > > > > target release date of June 24. > > > > > > > > Let me know if there are any objections. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Randall Hauch > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 2.6.0 release
Hi Randall, We have to remove KIP-584 from the release plan, as this item will not be completed for 2.6 release (although KIP is accepted). We plan to include it in a next release. Cheers, Kowshik On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:43 AM Maulin Vasavada wrote: > Hi Randall Hauch > > Can we add KIP-519 to 2.6? It was merged to Trunk already in April - > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=128650952 > . > > Thanks > Maulin > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:01 AM Randall Hauch wrote: > > > Here's an update on the AK 2.6.0 release. > > > > Code freeze was Wednesday, and the release plan [1] has been updated to > > reflect all of the KIPs that made the release. We've also cut the `2.6` > > branch that we'll use for the release; see separate email announcing the > > new branch. > > > > The next important date for the 2.6.0 release is CODE FREEZE on JUNE 10, > > and until that date all bug fixes are still welcome on the release > branch. > > But after that, only blocker bugs can be merged to the release branch. > > > > If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me or (better yet) > > reply to this thread. > > > > Thanks, and best regards! > > > > Randall > > > > [1] AK 2.6.0 Release Plan: > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > > > > > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 5:53 PM Matthias J. Sax > wrote: > > > > > Thanks Randall! > > > > > > I added missing KIP-594. > > > > > > > > > For the postponed KIP section: I removed KIP-441 and KIP-444 as both > are > > > completed. > > > > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > > > On 5/27/20 2:31 PM, Randall Hauch wrote: > > > > Hey everyone, just a quick update on the 2.6.0 release. > > > > > > > > Based on the release plan ( > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > > ), > > > > today (May 27) is feature freeze. Any major feature work that is not > > > > already complete will need to push out to the next release (either > 2.7 > > or > > > > 3.0). There are a few PRs for KIPs that are nearing completion, and > > we're > > > > having some Jenkins build issues. I will send another email later > today > > > or > > > > early tomorrow with an update, and I plan to cut the release branch > > > shortly > > > > thereafter. > > > > > > > > I have also updated the list of planned KIPs on the release plan > page ( > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > > ), > > > > and I've moved to the "Postponed" table any KIP that looks like it is > > not > > > > going to be complete today. If any KIP is in the wrong table, please > > let > > > me > > > > know. > > > > > > > > If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to reply to > > this > > > > thread. > > > > > > > > Thanks, and best regards! > > > > > > > > Randall > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 2:16 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman < > > sop...@confluent.io > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Hey Randall, > > > >> > > > >> Can you also add KIP-613 which was accepted yesterday? > > > >> > > > >> Thanks! > > > >> Sophie > > > >> > > > >> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 6:47 AM Randall Hauch > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> Hi, Tom. I saw last night that the KIP had enough votes before > > today’s > > > >>> deadline and I will add it to the roadmap today. Thanks for driving > > > this! > > > >>> > > > >>> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 6:18 AM Tom Bentley > > > wrote: > > > >>> > > > Hi Randall, > > > > > > Can we add KIP-585? (I'm not quite sure of the protocol here, but > > > >> thought > > > it better to ask than to just add it myself). > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Tom > > > > > > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 6:54 PM Randall Hauch > > > >> wrote: > > > > > > > Greetings! > > > > > > > > I'd like to volunteer to be release manager for the next > time-based > > > feature > > > > release which will be 2.6.0. I've published a release plan at > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > > > , > > > > and have included all of the KIPs that are currently approved or > > > >>> actively > > > > in discussion (though I'm happy to adjust as necessary). > > > > > > > > To stay on our time-based cadence, the KIP freeze is on May 20 > > with a > > > > target release date of June 24. > > > > > > > > Let me know if there are any objections. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Randall Hauch > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 2.6.0 release
Hi Randall Hauch Can we add KIP-519 to 2.6? It was merged to Trunk already in April - https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=128650952. Thanks Maulin On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:01 AM Randall Hauch wrote: > Here's an update on the AK 2.6.0 release. > > Code freeze was Wednesday, and the release plan [1] has been updated to > reflect all of the KIPs that made the release. We've also cut the `2.6` > branch that we'll use for the release; see separate email announcing the > new branch. > > The next important date for the 2.6.0 release is CODE FREEZE on JUNE 10, > and until that date all bug fixes are still welcome on the release branch. > But after that, only blocker bugs can be merged to the release branch. > > If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me or (better yet) > reply to this thread. > > Thanks, and best regards! > > Randall > > [1] AK 2.6.0 Release Plan: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 5:53 PM Matthias J. Sax wrote: > > > Thanks Randall! > > > > I added missing KIP-594. > > > > > > For the postponed KIP section: I removed KIP-441 and KIP-444 as both are > > completed. > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > On 5/27/20 2:31 PM, Randall Hauch wrote: > > > Hey everyone, just a quick update on the 2.6.0 release. > > > > > > Based on the release plan ( > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > ), > > > today (May 27) is feature freeze. Any major feature work that is not > > > already complete will need to push out to the next release (either 2.7 > or > > > 3.0). There are a few PRs for KIPs that are nearing completion, and > we're > > > having some Jenkins build issues. I will send another email later today > > or > > > early tomorrow with an update, and I plan to cut the release branch > > shortly > > > thereafter. > > > > > > I have also updated the list of planned KIPs on the release plan page ( > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > ), > > > and I've moved to the "Postponed" table any KIP that looks like it is > not > > > going to be complete today. If any KIP is in the wrong table, please > let > > me > > > know. > > > > > > If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to reply to > this > > > thread. > > > > > > Thanks, and best regards! > > > > > > Randall > > > > > > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 2:16 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman < > sop...@confluent.io > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Hey Randall, > > >> > > >> Can you also add KIP-613 which was accepted yesterday? > > >> > > >> Thanks! > > >> Sophie > > >> > > >> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 6:47 AM Randall Hauch > wrote: > > >> > > >>> Hi, Tom. I saw last night that the KIP had enough votes before > today’s > > >>> deadline and I will add it to the roadmap today. Thanks for driving > > this! > > >>> > > >>> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 6:18 AM Tom Bentley > > wrote: > > >>> > > Hi Randall, > > > > Can we add KIP-585? (I'm not quite sure of the protocol here, but > > >> thought > > it better to ask than to just add it myself). > > > > Thanks, > > > > Tom > > > > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 6:54 PM Randall Hauch > > >> wrote: > > > > > Greetings! > > > > > > I'd like to volunteer to be release manager for the next time-based > > feature > > > release which will be 2.6.0. I've published a release plan at > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > > , > > > and have included all of the KIPs that are currently approved or > > >>> actively > > > in discussion (though I'm happy to adjust as necessary). > > > > > > To stay on our time-based cadence, the KIP freeze is on May 20 > with a > > > target release date of June 24. > > > > > > Let me know if there are any objections. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Randall Hauch > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 2.6.0 release
Here's an update on the AK 2.6.0 release. Code freeze was Wednesday, and the release plan [1] has been updated to reflect all of the KIPs that made the release. We've also cut the `2.6` branch that we'll use for the release; see separate email announcing the new branch. The next important date for the 2.6.0 release is CODE FREEZE on JUNE 10, and until that date all bug fixes are still welcome on the release branch. But after that, only blocker bugs can be merged to the release branch. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me or (better yet) reply to this thread. Thanks, and best regards! Randall [1] AK 2.6.0 Release Plan: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 5:53 PM Matthias J. Sax wrote: > Thanks Randall! > > I added missing KIP-594. > > > For the postponed KIP section: I removed KIP-441 and KIP-444 as both are > completed. > > > -Matthias > > On 5/27/20 2:31 PM, Randall Hauch wrote: > > Hey everyone, just a quick update on the 2.6.0 release. > > > > Based on the release plan ( > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > ), > > today (May 27) is feature freeze. Any major feature work that is not > > already complete will need to push out to the next release (either 2.7 or > > 3.0). There are a few PRs for KIPs that are nearing completion, and we're > > having some Jenkins build issues. I will send another email later today > or > > early tomorrow with an update, and I plan to cut the release branch > shortly > > thereafter. > > > > I have also updated the list of planned KIPs on the release plan page ( > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > ), > > and I've moved to the "Postponed" table any KIP that looks like it is not > > going to be complete today. If any KIP is in the wrong table, please let > me > > know. > > > > If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to reply to this > > thread. > > > > Thanks, and best regards! > > > > Randall > > > > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 2:16 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman > > > wrote: > > > >> Hey Randall, > >> > >> Can you also add KIP-613 which was accepted yesterday? > >> > >> Thanks! > >> Sophie > >> > >> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 6:47 AM Randall Hauch wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, Tom. I saw last night that the KIP had enough votes before today’s > >>> deadline and I will add it to the roadmap today. Thanks for driving > this! > >>> > >>> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 6:18 AM Tom Bentley > wrote: > >>> > Hi Randall, > > Can we add KIP-585? (I'm not quite sure of the protocol here, but > >> thought > it better to ask than to just add it myself). > > Thanks, > > Tom > > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 6:54 PM Randall Hauch > >> wrote: > > > Greetings! > > > > I'd like to volunteer to be release manager for the next time-based > feature > > release which will be 2.6.0. I've published a release plan at > > > > >>> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > , > > and have included all of the KIPs that are currently approved or > >>> actively > > in discussion (though I'm happy to adjust as necessary). > > > > To stay on our time-based cadence, the KIP freeze is on May 20 with a > > target release date of June 24. > > > > Let me know if there are any objections. > > > > Thanks, > > Randall Hauch > > > > >>> > >> > > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 2.6.0 release
Thanks Randall! I added missing KIP-594. For the postponed KIP section: I removed KIP-441 and KIP-444 as both are completed. -Matthias On 5/27/20 2:31 PM, Randall Hauch wrote: > Hey everyone, just a quick update on the 2.6.0 release. > > Based on the release plan ( > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430), > today (May 27) is feature freeze. Any major feature work that is not > already complete will need to push out to the next release (either 2.7 or > 3.0). There are a few PRs for KIPs that are nearing completion, and we're > having some Jenkins build issues. I will send another email later today or > early tomorrow with an update, and I plan to cut the release branch shortly > thereafter. > > I have also updated the list of planned KIPs on the release plan page ( > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430), > and I've moved to the "Postponed" table any KIP that looks like it is not > going to be complete today. If any KIP is in the wrong table, please let me > know. > > If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to reply to this > thread. > > Thanks, and best regards! > > Randall > > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 2:16 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman > wrote: > >> Hey Randall, >> >> Can you also add KIP-613 which was accepted yesterday? >> >> Thanks! >> Sophie >> >> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 6:47 AM Randall Hauch wrote: >> >>> Hi, Tom. I saw last night that the KIP had enough votes before today’s >>> deadline and I will add it to the roadmap today. Thanks for driving this! >>> >>> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 6:18 AM Tom Bentley wrote: >>> Hi Randall, Can we add KIP-585? (I'm not quite sure of the protocol here, but >> thought it better to ask than to just add it myself). Thanks, Tom On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 6:54 PM Randall Hauch >> wrote: > Greetings! > > I'd like to volunteer to be release manager for the next time-based feature > release which will be 2.6.0. I've published a release plan at > >>> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > , > and have included all of the KIPs that are currently approved or >>> actively > in discussion (though I'm happy to adjust as necessary). > > To stay on our time-based cadence, the KIP freeze is on May 20 with a > target release date of June 24. > > Let me know if there are any objections. > > Thanks, > Randall Hauch > >>> >> > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 2.6.0 release
Hey everyone, just a quick update on the 2.6.0 release. Based on the release plan ( https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430), today (May 27) is feature freeze. Any major feature work that is not already complete will need to push out to the next release (either 2.7 or 3.0). There are a few PRs for KIPs that are nearing completion, and we're having some Jenkins build issues. I will send another email later today or early tomorrow with an update, and I plan to cut the release branch shortly thereafter. I have also updated the list of planned KIPs on the release plan page ( https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430), and I've moved to the "Postponed" table any KIP that looks like it is not going to be complete today. If any KIP is in the wrong table, please let me know. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to reply to this thread. Thanks, and best regards! Randall On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 2:16 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman wrote: > Hey Randall, > > Can you also add KIP-613 which was accepted yesterday? > > Thanks! > Sophie > > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 6:47 AM Randall Hauch wrote: > > > Hi, Tom. I saw last night that the KIP had enough votes before today’s > > deadline and I will add it to the roadmap today. Thanks for driving this! > > > > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 6:18 AM Tom Bentley wrote: > > > > > Hi Randall, > > > > > > Can we add KIP-585? (I'm not quite sure of the protocol here, but > thought > > > it better to ask than to just add it myself). > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Tom > > > > > > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 6:54 PM Randall Hauch > wrote: > > > > > > > Greetings! > > > > > > > > I'd like to volunteer to be release manager for the next time-based > > > feature > > > > release which will be 2.6.0. I've published a release plan at > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > > > , > > > > and have included all of the KIPs that are currently approved or > > actively > > > > in discussion (though I'm happy to adjust as necessary). > > > > > > > > To stay on our time-based cadence, the KIP freeze is on May 20 with a > > > > target release date of June 24. > > > > > > > > Let me know if there are any objections. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Randall Hauch > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 2.6.0 release
Hey Randall, Can you also add KIP-613 which was accepted yesterday? Thanks! Sophie On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 6:47 AM Randall Hauch wrote: > Hi, Tom. I saw last night that the KIP had enough votes before today’s > deadline and I will add it to the roadmap today. Thanks for driving this! > > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 6:18 AM Tom Bentley wrote: > > > Hi Randall, > > > > Can we add KIP-585? (I'm not quite sure of the protocol here, but thought > > it better to ask than to just add it myself). > > > > Thanks, > > > > Tom > > > > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 6:54 PM Randall Hauch wrote: > > > > > Greetings! > > > > > > I'd like to volunteer to be release manager for the next time-based > > feature > > > release which will be 2.6.0. I've published a release plan at > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > > , > > > and have included all of the KIPs that are currently approved or > actively > > > in discussion (though I'm happy to adjust as necessary). > > > > > > To stay on our time-based cadence, the KIP freeze is on May 20 with a > > > target release date of June 24. > > > > > > Let me know if there are any objections. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Randall Hauch > > > > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 2.6.0 release
Hi, Tom. I saw last night that the KIP had enough votes before today’s deadline and I will add it to the roadmap today. Thanks for driving this! On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 6:18 AM Tom Bentley wrote: > Hi Randall, > > Can we add KIP-585? (I'm not quite sure of the protocol here, but thought > it better to ask than to just add it myself). > > Thanks, > > Tom > > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 6:54 PM Randall Hauch wrote: > > > Greetings! > > > > I'd like to volunteer to be release manager for the next time-based > feature > > release which will be 2.6.0. I've published a release plan at > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > , > > and have included all of the KIPs that are currently approved or actively > > in discussion (though I'm happy to adjust as necessary). > > > > To stay on our time-based cadence, the KIP freeze is on May 20 with a > > target release date of June 24. > > > > Let me know if there are any objections. > > > > Thanks, > > Randall Hauch > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 2.6.0 release
Hi Randall, Can we add KIP-585? (I'm not quite sure of the protocol here, but thought it better to ask than to just add it myself). Thanks, Tom On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 6:54 PM Randall Hauch wrote: > Greetings! > > I'd like to volunteer to be release manager for the next time-based feature > release which will be 2.6.0. I've published a release plan at > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > , > and have included all of the KIPs that are currently approved or actively > in discussion (though I'm happy to adjust as necessary). > > To stay on our time-based cadence, the KIP freeze is on May 20 with a > target release date of June 24. > > Let me know if there are any objections. > > Thanks, > Randall Hauch >
