Re: [VOTE] KIP-545 support automated consumer offset sync across clusters in MM 2.0

2020-06-03 Thread Ryanne Dolan
Looks like we've got the required votes! Congrats Ning! Please note this KIP was proposed and written by Ning Zhang, not myself, but we've collaborated on the PR, testing, and community outreach. Now lets work to get the PR merged! Ryanne On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 1:47 PM Bill Bejeck wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-545 support automated consumer offset sync across clusters in MM 2.0

2020-05-25 Thread Bill Bejeck
Thanks for the clear well written KIP. This seems like a useful feature to me. +1(binding) -Bill On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 12:50 PM John Roesler wrote: > Thanks for the KIP, Ryanne! > > It looks like a good feature to me, and the KIP looks well motivated and > well designed. > > I’m +1

Re: [VOTE] KIP-545 support automated consumer offset sync across clusters in MM 2.0

2020-05-24 Thread John Roesler
Thanks for the KIP, Ryanne! It looks like a good feature to me, and the KIP looks well motivated and well designed. I’m +1 (binding) -John On Thu, May 21, 2020, at 10:49, Harsha Ch wrote: > +1 (binding). Good addition to MM 2. > > -Harsha > > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 8:36 AM, Manikumar <

Re: [VOTE] KIP-545 support automated consumer offset sync across clusters in MM 2.0

2020-05-21 Thread Harsha Ch
+1 (binding). Good addition to MM 2. -Harsha On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 8:36 AM, Manikumar < manikumar.re...@gmail.com > wrote: > > > > +1 (binding). > > > > Thanks for the KIP. > > > > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 9:49 AM Maulin Vasavada < maulin. vasavada@ gmail. > com (

Re: [VOTE] KIP-545 support automated consumer offset sync across clusters in MM 2.0

2020-05-21 Thread Manikumar
+1 (binding). Thanks for the KIP. On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 9:49 AM Maulin Vasavada wrote: > Thank you for the KIP. I sincerely hope we get enough votes on this KIP. I > was thinking of similar changes while working on DR capabilities and > offsets are Achilles Heels and this KIP addresses it. >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-545 support automated consumer offset sync across clusters in MM 2.0

2020-05-20 Thread Maulin Vasavada
Thank you for the KIP. I sincerely hope we get enough votes on this KIP. I was thinking of similar changes while working on DR capabilities and offsets are Achilles Heels and this KIP addresses it. On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 6:10 PM Maulin Vasavada wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Mon, May 18,

Re: [VOTE] KIP-545 support automated consumer offset sync across clusters in MM 2.0

2020-05-18 Thread Maulin Vasavada
+1 (non-binding) On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 9:41 AM Ryanne Dolan wrote: > Bump. Looks like we've got 6 non-binding votes and 1 binding. > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 11:25 AM Ning Zhang > wrote: > > > Hello committers, > > > > I am the author of the KIP-545 and if we still miss votes from the > >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-545 support automated consumer offset sync across clusters in MM 2.0

2020-05-18 Thread Ryanne Dolan
Bump. Looks like we've got 6 non-binding votes and 1 binding. On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 11:25 AM Ning Zhang wrote: > Hello committers, > > I am the author of the KIP-545 and if we still miss votes from the > committers, please review the KIP and vote for it, so that the > corresponding PR will be

Re: [VOTE] KIP-545 support automated consumer offset sync across clusters in MM 2.0

2020-02-20 Thread Ning Zhang
Hello committers, I am the author of the KIP-545 and if we still miss votes from the committers, please review the KIP and vote for it, so that the corresponding PR will be reviewed soon.

Re: [VOTE] KIP-545 support automated consumer offset sync across clusters in MM 2.0

2020-02-06 Thread Andrew Schofield
+1 (non-binding) Thanks for the KIP. On 06/02/2020, 17:06, "Edoardo Comar" wrote: +1 (non-binding) thanks for the KIP ! On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 at 13:57, Navinder Brar wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > Navinder > On Tuesday, 14 January, 2020, 07:24:02 pm IST,

Re: [VOTE] KIP-545 support automated consumer offset sync across clusters in MM 2.0

2020-02-06 Thread Edoardo Comar
+1 (non-binding) thanks for the KIP ! On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 at 13:57, Navinder Brar wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > Navinder > On Tuesday, 14 January, 2020, 07:24:02 pm IST, Ryanne Dolan < > ryannedo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Bump. We've got 4 non-binding and one binding vote. > > Ryanne > > On

Re: [VOTE] KIP-545 support automated consumer offset sync across clusters in MM 2.0

2020-01-14 Thread Navinder Brar
+1 (non-binding) Navinder On Tuesday, 14 January, 2020, 07:24:02 pm IST, Ryanne Dolan wrote: Bump. We've got 4 non-binding and one binding vote. Ryanne On Fri, Dec 13, 2019, 1:44 AM Tom Bentley wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 6:33 PM Andrew Schofield < >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-545 support automated consumer offset sync across clusters in MM 2.0

2020-01-14 Thread Ryanne Dolan
Bump. We've got 4 non-binding and one binding vote. Ryanne On Fri, Dec 13, 2019, 1:44 AM Tom Bentley wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 6:33 PM Andrew Schofield < > andrew_schofi...@live.com> > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On 12/12/2019, 14:20, "Mickael Maison" >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-545 support automated consumer offset sync across clusters in MM 2.0

2019-12-12 Thread Tom Bentley
+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 6:33 PM Andrew Schofield wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On 12/12/2019, 14:20, "Mickael Maison" wrote: > > +1 (binding) > Thanks for the KIP! > > On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 12:56 AM Ryanne Dolan > wrote: > > > > Bump. We've got 2

Re: [VOTE] KIP-545 support automated consumer offset sync across clusters in MM 2.0

2019-12-12 Thread Andrew Schofield
+1 (non-binding) On 12/12/2019, 14:20, "Mickael Maison" wrote: +1 (binding) Thanks for the KIP! On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 12:56 AM Ryanne Dolan wrote: > > Bump. We've got 2 non-binding votes so far. > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 3:32 PM Ning Zhang wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-545 support automated consumer offset sync across clusters in MM 2.0

2019-12-12 Thread Mickael Maison
+1 (binding) Thanks for the KIP! On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 12:56 AM Ryanne Dolan wrote: > > Bump. We've got 2 non-binding votes so far. > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 3:32 PM Ning Zhang wrote: > > > My current plan is to implement this in "MirrorCheckpointTask" > > > > On 2019/11/02 03:30:11, Xu

Re: [VOTE] KIP-545 support automated consumer offset sync across clusters in MM 2.0

2019-12-04 Thread Ryanne Dolan
Bump. We've got 2 non-binding votes so far. On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 3:32 PM Ning Zhang wrote: > My current plan is to implement this in "MirrorCheckpointTask" > > On 2019/11/02 03:30:11, Xu Jianhai wrote: > > I think this kip will implement a task in sinkTask ? right? > > > > On Sat, Nov 2,

Re: [VOTE] KIP-545 support automated consumer offset sync across clusters in MM 2.0

2019-11-13 Thread Ning Zhang
My current plan is to implement this in "MirrorCheckpointTask" On 2019/11/02 03:30:11, Xu Jianhai wrote: > I think this kip will implement a task in sinkTask ? right? > > On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 1:06 AM Ryanne Dolan wrote: > > > Hey y'all, Ning Zhang and I would like to start the vote for the

Re: [VOTE] KIP-545 support automated consumer offset sync across clusters in MM 2.0

2019-11-01 Thread Xu Jianhai
I think this kip will implement a task in sinkTask ? right? On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 1:06 AM Ryanne Dolan wrote: > Hey y'all, Ning Zhang and I would like to start the vote for the following > small KIP: > > >