Re: Reg: [VOTE] KIP 157 - Add consumer config options to streams reset tool

2017-06-11 Thread BigData dev
Thanks everyone for voting.

KIP-157 has passed with +3 binding (Ewen, Jason and Guozhang Wang) and +3
non-binding (Matthias J. Sax and Bill Bejeck)

Thanks,

Bharat Viswanadham

On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Guozhang Wang  wrote:

> Bharat,
>
> I think we already have 3 committers voted on this KIP, could you conclude
> the thread?
>
>
> Guozhang
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Jason Gustafson 
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks. +1
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 9:40 PM, Matthias J. Sax 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Thanks for updating the KIP!
> > >
> > > -Matthias
> > >
> > > On 6/1/17 6:18 PM, Bill Bejeck wrote:
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Bill
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Guozhang Wang 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> +1 again. Thanks.
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 1:46 PM, BigData dev <
> bigdatadev...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Hi All,
> > > >>> Updated the KIP, as the consumer configurations are required for
> both
> > > >> Admin
> > > >>> Client and Consumer in Stream reset tool. Updated the KIP to use
> > > >>> command-config option, similar to other tools like
> > > >> kafka-consumer-groups.sh
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+
> > > >>> 157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool
> > > >>>  > > >>> 157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool>*
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> So, starting the voting process again for further inputs.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> This vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thanks,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Bharat
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Guozhang Wang  >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > >  +1. Thanks!
> > > 
> > >  On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Eno Thereska <
> > eno.there...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > >  wrote:
> > > 
> > > > +1 thanks.
> > > >
> > > > Eno
> > > >> On 16 May 2017, at 04:20, BigData dev 
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Hi All,
> > > >> Given the simple and non-controversial nature of the KIP, I
> would
> > > >>> like
> > >  to
> > > >> start the voting process for KIP-157: Add consumer config
> options
> > > >> to
> > > >> streams reset tool
> > > >>
> > > >> *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+157+-
> > > > +Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool
> > > >>  > > > +Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool>*
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >>
> > > >> Bharat
> > > >
> > > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  --
> > >  -- Guozhang
> > > 
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> -- Guozhang
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> -- Guozhang
>


Re: Reg: [VOTE] KIP 157 - Add consumer config options to streams reset tool

2017-06-10 Thread Guozhang Wang
Bharat,

I think we already have 3 committers voted on this KIP, could you conclude
the thread?


Guozhang


On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Jason Gustafson  wrote:

> Thanks. +1
>
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 9:40 PM, Matthias J. Sax 
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Thanks for updating the KIP!
> >
> > -Matthias
> >
> > On 6/1/17 6:18 PM, Bill Bejeck wrote:
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Bill
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Guozhang Wang 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1 again. Thanks.
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 1:46 PM, BigData dev  >
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi All,
> > >>> Updated the KIP, as the consumer configurations are required for both
> > >> Admin
> > >>> Client and Consumer in Stream reset tool. Updated the KIP to use
> > >>> command-config option, similar to other tools like
> > >> kafka-consumer-groups.sh
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+
> > >>> 157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool
> > >>>  > >>> 157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool>*
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> So, starting the voting process again for further inputs.
> > >>>
> > >>> This vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>>
> > >>> Bharat
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Guozhang Wang 
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>
> >  +1. Thanks!
> > 
> >  On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Eno Thereska <
> eno.there...@gmail.com
> > >
> >  wrote:
> > 
> > > +1 thanks.
> > >
> > > Eno
> > >> On 16 May 2017, at 04:20, BigData dev 
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi All,
> > >> Given the simple and non-controversial nature of the KIP, I would
> > >>> like
> >  to
> > >> start the voting process for KIP-157: Add consumer config options
> > >> to
> > >> streams reset tool
> > >>
> > >> *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+157+-
> > > +Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool
> > >>  > > +Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool>*
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >>
> > >> Bharat
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > 
> >  --
> >  -- Guozhang
> > 
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> -- Guozhang
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
>



-- 
-- Guozhang


Re: Reg: [VOTE] KIP 157 - Add consumer config options to streams reset tool

2017-06-02 Thread Jason Gustafson
Thanks. +1

On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 9:40 PM, Matthias J. Sax 
wrote:

> +1
>
> Thanks for updating the KIP!
>
> -Matthias
>
> On 6/1/17 6:18 PM, Bill Bejeck wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Bill
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Guozhang Wang 
> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 again. Thanks.
> >>
> >> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 1:46 PM, BigData dev 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi All,
> >>> Updated the KIP, as the consumer configurations are required for both
> >> Admin
> >>> Client and Consumer in Stream reset tool. Updated the KIP to use
> >>> command-config option, similar to other tools like
> >> kafka-consumer-groups.sh
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+
> >>> 157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool
> >>>  >>> 157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool>*
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> So, starting the voting process again for further inputs.
> >>>
> >>> This vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Bharat
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Guozhang Wang 
> >> wrote:
> >>>
>  +1. Thanks!
> 
>  On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Eno Thereska  >
>  wrote:
> 
> > +1 thanks.
> >
> > Eno
> >> On 16 May 2017, at 04:20, BigData dev 
> >>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi All,
> >> Given the simple and non-controversial nature of the KIP, I would
> >>> like
>  to
> >> start the voting process for KIP-157: Add consumer config options
> >> to
> >> streams reset tool
> >>
> >> *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+157+-
> > +Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool
> >>  > +Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool>*
> >>
> >>
> >> The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Bharat
> >
> >
> 
> 
>  --
>  -- Guozhang
> 
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> -- Guozhang
> >>
> >
>
>


Re: Reg: [VOTE] KIP 157 - Add consumer config options to streams reset tool

2017-06-01 Thread Matthias J. Sax
+1

Thanks for updating the KIP!

-Matthias

On 6/1/17 6:18 PM, Bill Bejeck wrote:
> +1
> 
> Thanks,
> Bill
> 
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Guozhang Wang  wrote:
> 
>> +1 again. Thanks.
>>
>> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 1:46 PM, BigData dev 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>> Updated the KIP, as the consumer configurations are required for both
>> Admin
>>> Client and Consumer in Stream reset tool. Updated the KIP to use
>>> command-config option, similar to other tools like
>> kafka-consumer-groups.sh
>>>
>>>
>>> *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+
>>> 157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool
>>> >> 157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool>*
>>>
>>>
>>> So, starting the voting process again for further inputs.
>>>
>>> This vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Bharat
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Guozhang Wang 
>> wrote:
>>>
 +1. Thanks!

 On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Eno Thereska 
 wrote:

> +1 thanks.
>
> Eno
>> On 16 May 2017, at 04:20, BigData dev 
>>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>> Given the simple and non-controversial nature of the KIP, I would
>>> like
 to
>> start the voting process for KIP-157: Add consumer config options
>> to
>> streams reset tool
>>
>> *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+157+-
> +Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool
>>  +Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool>*
>>
>>
>> The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Bharat
>
>


 --
 -- Guozhang

>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> -- Guozhang
>>
> 



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Reg: [VOTE] KIP 157 - Add consumer config options to streams reset tool

2017-06-01 Thread Bill Bejeck
+1

Thanks,
Bill

On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Guozhang Wang  wrote:

> +1 again. Thanks.
>
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 1:46 PM, BigData dev 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> > Updated the KIP, as the consumer configurations are required for both
> Admin
> > Client and Consumer in Stream reset tool. Updated the KIP to use
> > command-config option, similar to other tools like
> kafka-consumer-groups.sh
> >
> >
> > *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+
> > 157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool
> >  > 157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool>*
> >
> >
> > So, starting the voting process again for further inputs.
> >
> > This vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Bharat
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Guozhang Wang 
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1. Thanks!
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Eno Thereska 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 thanks.
> > > >
> > > > Eno
> > > > > On 16 May 2017, at 04:20, BigData dev 
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > Given the simple and non-controversial nature of the KIP, I would
> > like
> > > to
> > > > > start the voting process for KIP-157: Add consumer config options
> to
> > > > > streams reset tool
> > > > >
> > > > > *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+157+-
> > > > +Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool
> > > > >  > > > +Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool>*
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > Bharat
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > -- Guozhang
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> -- Guozhang
>


Re: Reg: [VOTE] KIP 157 - Add consumer config options to streams reset tool

2017-06-01 Thread Guozhang Wang
+1 again. Thanks.

On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 1:46 PM, BigData dev 
wrote:

> Hi All,
> Updated the KIP, as the consumer configurations are required for both Admin
> Client and Consumer in Stream reset tool. Updated the KIP to use
> command-config option, similar to other tools like kafka-consumer-groups.sh
>
>
> *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+
> 157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool
>  157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool>*
>
>
> So, starting the voting process again for further inputs.
>
> This vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bharat
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Guozhang Wang  wrote:
>
> > +1. Thanks!
> >
> > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Eno Thereska 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 thanks.
> > >
> > > Eno
> > > > On 16 May 2017, at 04:20, BigData dev 
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi All,
> > > > Given the simple and non-controversial nature of the KIP, I would
> like
> > to
> > > > start the voting process for KIP-157: Add consumer config options to
> > > > streams reset tool
> > > >
> > > > *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+157+-
> > > +Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool
> > > >  > > +Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool>*
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Bharat
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -- Guozhang
> >
>



-- 
-- Guozhang


Re: Reg: [VOTE] KIP 157 - Add consumer config options to streams reset tool

2017-05-30 Thread BigData dev
Hi All,
Updated the KIP, as the consumer configurations are required for both Admin
Client and Consumer in Stream reset tool. Updated the KIP to use
command-config option, similar to other tools like kafka-consumer-groups.sh


*https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool
*


So, starting the voting process again for further inputs.

This vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.

Thanks,

Bharat



On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Guozhang Wang  wrote:

> +1. Thanks!
>
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Eno Thereska 
> wrote:
>
> > +1 thanks.
> >
> > Eno
> > > On 16 May 2017, at 04:20, BigData dev  wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi All,
> > > Given the simple and non-controversial nature of the KIP, I would like
> to
> > > start the voting process for KIP-157: Add consumer config options to
> > > streams reset tool
> > >
> > > *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+157+-
> > +Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool
> > >  > +Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool>*
> > >
> > >
> > > The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Bharat
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> -- Guozhang
>


Re: Reg: [VOTE] KIP 157 - Add consumer config options to streams reset tool

2017-05-30 Thread Guozhang Wang
+1. Thanks!

On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Eno Thereska 
wrote:

> +1 thanks.
>
> Eno
> > On 16 May 2017, at 04:20, BigData dev  wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> > Given the simple and non-controversial nature of the KIP, I would like to
> > start the voting process for KIP-157: Add consumer config options to
> > streams reset tool
> >
> > *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+157+-
> +Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool
> >  +Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool>*
> >
> >
> > The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Bharat
>
>


-- 
-- Guozhang


Re: Reg: [VOTE] KIP 157 - Add consumer config options to streams reset tool

2017-05-22 Thread BigData dev
Hi Matthias,
For the AdminClient, client configuration is needed. And for zookeeper, no
properties are required.
So, in other tools like consumerGroupCommand, they used the command config
option.
I think consumer-config and consumer-property are not required here. We
will use the configurations passed through command-config for both admin
client and Embedded consumer.

Thanks,
Bharat


On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Matthias J. Sax 
wrote:

> Couple of follow ups.
>
> The reset tool uses AdminClient, ZkUtils, and a KafkaConsumer
> internally. Thus, I am wondering if we need the possibility to specify
> configs for all of them?
>
> The original JIRA reported, that the reset tool does not work for a
> secured cluster, and thus, I doubt that consumer properties are
> sufficient for resolve this.
>
> Maybe some people that are more familiar with Kafka security can help
> out here. I personally have only limited knowledge about this topic.
>
>
> -Matthias
>
>
>
> On 5/19/17 11:09 AM, BigData dev wrote:
> > Thanks for the info, Matthias.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Bharat
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Matthias J. Sax  >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> KIP-157 cannot be included in 0.11.0.0 anymore. KIP freeze date deadline
> >> is strict.
> >>
> >> -Matthias
> >>
> >> On 5/19/17 10:15 AM, BigData dev wrote:
> >>> Hi Matthias,
> >>> I will start a new KIP for Kafka tools options to be a standard across
> >> all
> >>> tools shortly. But I think the KIP 157 for Kafka Streams, should be
> >> needed
> >>> for 0.11.0.0 release, (KIP freeze date is already over, but I think
> this
> >> is
> >>> minor code change in tools to add option to streams reset tool) as
> >> without
> >>> this consumer config options, it will not be possible to use the tool
> in
> >> a
> >>> secured environment. Please let me know your thoughts on this. If it
> >> needs
> >>> to be moved to next release, I will work on this as part of KIP 14.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Bharat
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Matthias J. Sax <
> matth...@confluent.io
> >>>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
>  I double checked with Matthew Warhaftig (the original author of
> KIP-14)
>  and he has not interest to continue the KIP atm.
> 
>  Thus, Bharat can continue the work on KIP-14. I think it would be
> best,
>  to start a new DISCUSS thread after you update KIP-14.
> 
>  Thanks for your contributions!
> 
> 
>  -Matthias
> 
> 
>  On 5/17/17 12:56 PM, BigData dev wrote:
> > Hi,
> > When I was trying to find more info, there is already a proposed KIP
> >> for
> > this
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
>  14+-+Tools+Standardization
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Bharat
> >
> > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 12:38 PM, BigData dev <
> bigdatadev...@gmail.com
> >>>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Ewen, Matthias,
> >> For common configuration across all the tools, I will work on that
> as
>  part
> >> of other KIP by looking into all Kafka tools.
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Bharat
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Matthias J. Sax <
> >> matth...@confluent.io
> >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> I also second Ewen comment -- standardizing the common supported
> >>> parameters over all tools would be great!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -Matthias
> >>>
> >>> On 5/17/17 12:57 AM, Damian Guy wrote:
>  +1
> 
>  On Wed, 17 May 2017 at 05:40 Ewen Cheslack-Postava <
> >> e...@confluent.io
> >
>  wrote:
> 
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > I mentioned this in the PR that triggered this:
> >
> >> KIP is accurate, though this is one of those things that we
> should
> > probably get a KIP for a standard set of config options across
> all
> >>> tools so
> > additions like this can just fall under the umbrella of that
> KIP...
> >
> > I think it would be great if someone wrote up a small KIP
> providing
> >>> some
> > standardized settings that we could get future additions
>  automatically
> > umbrella'd under, e.g. no need to do a KIP if just adding a
> >>> consumer.config
> > or consumer-property config conforming to existing expectations
> for
> >>> other
> > tools. We could also standardize on a few other settings names
> that
>  are
> > inconsistent across different tools and set out a clear path
> >> forward
> >>> for
> > future tools.
> >
> > I think I still have at least one open PR from when I first
> started
>  on
> >>> the
> > project where I was trying to clean up some command line stuff to
> >> be
> >>> more
> > consistent. This has been an issue for many years now...
> >
> > 

Re: Reg: [VOTE] KIP 157 - Add consumer config options to streams reset tool

2017-05-19 Thread Matthias J. Sax
Couple of follow ups.

The reset tool uses AdminClient, ZkUtils, and a KafkaConsumer
internally. Thus, I am wondering if we need the possibility to specify
configs for all of them?

The original JIRA reported, that the reset tool does not work for a
secured cluster, and thus, I doubt that consumer properties are
sufficient for resolve this.

Maybe some people that are more familiar with Kafka security can help
out here. I personally have only limited knowledge about this topic.


-Matthias



On 5/19/17 11:09 AM, BigData dev wrote:
> Thanks for the info, Matthias.
> 
> Regards,
> Bharat
> 
> 
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Matthias J. Sax 
> wrote:
> 
>> KIP-157 cannot be included in 0.11.0.0 anymore. KIP freeze date deadline
>> is strict.
>>
>> -Matthias
>>
>> On 5/19/17 10:15 AM, BigData dev wrote:
>>> Hi Matthias,
>>> I will start a new KIP for Kafka tools options to be a standard across
>> all
>>> tools shortly. But I think the KIP 157 for Kafka Streams, should be
>> needed
>>> for 0.11.0.0 release, (KIP freeze date is already over, but I think this
>> is
>>> minor code change in tools to add option to streams reset tool) as
>> without
>>> this consumer config options, it will not be possible to use the tool in
>> a
>>> secured environment. Please let me know your thoughts on this. If it
>> needs
>>> to be moved to next release, I will work on this as part of KIP 14.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Bharat
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Matthias J. Sax >>
>>> wrote:
>>>
 I double checked with Matthew Warhaftig (the original author of KIP-14)
 and he has not interest to continue the KIP atm.

 Thus, Bharat can continue the work on KIP-14. I think it would be best,
 to start a new DISCUSS thread after you update KIP-14.

 Thanks for your contributions!


 -Matthias


 On 5/17/17 12:56 PM, BigData dev wrote:
> Hi,
> When I was trying to find more info, there is already a proposed KIP
>> for
> this
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
 14+-+Tools+Standardization
>
>
> Thanks,
> Bharat
>
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 12:38 PM, BigData dev >>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ewen, Matthias,
>> For common configuration across all the tools, I will work on that as
 part
>> of other KIP by looking into all Kafka tools.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Bharat
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Matthias J. Sax <
>> matth...@confluent.io
>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> I also second Ewen comment -- standardizing the common supported
>>> parameters over all tools would be great!
>>>
>>>
>>> -Matthias
>>>
>>> On 5/17/17 12:57 AM, Damian Guy wrote:
 +1

 On Wed, 17 May 2017 at 05:40 Ewen Cheslack-Postava <
>> e...@confluent.io
>
 wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> I mentioned this in the PR that triggered this:
>
>> KIP is accurate, though this is one of those things that we should
> probably get a KIP for a standard set of config options across all
>>> tools so
> additions like this can just fall under the umbrella of that KIP...
>
> I think it would be great if someone wrote up a small KIP providing
>>> some
> standardized settings that we could get future additions
 automatically
> umbrella'd under, e.g. no need to do a KIP if just adding a
>>> consumer.config
> or consumer-property config conforming to existing expectations for
>>> other
> tools. We could also standardize on a few other settings names that
 are
> inconsistent across different tools and set out a clear path
>> forward
>>> for
> future tools.
>
> I think I still have at least one open PR from when I first started
 on
>>> the
> project where I was trying to clean up some command line stuff to
>> be
>>> more
> consistent. This has been an issue for many years now...
>
> -Ewen
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Eno Thereska <
 eno.there...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 thanks.
>>
>> Eno
>>> On 16 May 2017, at 04:20, BigData dev 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>> Given the simple and non-controversial nature of the KIP, I would
>>> like
> to
>>> start the voting process for KIP-157: Add consumer config options
 to
>>> streams reset tool
>>>
>>> *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+
>> 157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool
>>> > 

Re: Reg: [VOTE] KIP 157 - Add consumer config options to streams reset tool

2017-05-19 Thread BigData dev
Thanks for the info, Matthias.

Regards,
Bharat


On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Matthias J. Sax 
wrote:

> KIP-157 cannot be included in 0.11.0.0 anymore. KIP freeze date deadline
> is strict.
>
> -Matthias
>
> On 5/19/17 10:15 AM, BigData dev wrote:
> > Hi Matthias,
> > I will start a new KIP for Kafka tools options to be a standard across
> all
> > tools shortly. But I think the KIP 157 for Kafka Streams, should be
> needed
> > for 0.11.0.0 release, (KIP freeze date is already over, but I think this
> is
> > minor code change in tools to add option to streams reset tool) as
> without
> > this consumer config options, it will not be possible to use the tool in
> a
> > secured environment. Please let me know your thoughts on this. If it
> needs
> > to be moved to next release, I will work on this as part of KIP 14.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Bharat
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Matthias J. Sax  >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I double checked with Matthew Warhaftig (the original author of KIP-14)
> >> and he has not interest to continue the KIP atm.
> >>
> >> Thus, Bharat can continue the work on KIP-14. I think it would be best,
> >> to start a new DISCUSS thread after you update KIP-14.
> >>
> >> Thanks for your contributions!
> >>
> >>
> >> -Matthias
> >>
> >>
> >> On 5/17/17 12:56 PM, BigData dev wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>> When I was trying to find more info, there is already a proposed KIP
> for
> >>> this
> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> >> 14+-+Tools+Standardization
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Bharat
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 12:38 PM, BigData dev  >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
>  Hi Ewen, Matthias,
>  For common configuration across all the tools, I will work on that as
> >> part
>  of other KIP by looking into all Kafka tools.
> 
> 
>  Thanks,
>  Bharat
> 
> 
>  On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Matthias J. Sax <
> matth...@confluent.io
> >>>
>  wrote:
> 
> > +1
> >
> > I also second Ewen comment -- standardizing the common supported
> > parameters over all tools would be great!
> >
> >
> > -Matthias
> >
> > On 5/17/17 12:57 AM, Damian Guy wrote:
> >> +1
> >>
> >> On Wed, 17 May 2017 at 05:40 Ewen Cheslack-Postava <
> e...@confluent.io
> >>>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1 (binding)
> >>>
> >>> I mentioned this in the PR that triggered this:
> >>>
>  KIP is accurate, though this is one of those things that we should
> >>> probably get a KIP for a standard set of config options across all
> > tools so
> >>> additions like this can just fall under the umbrella of that KIP...
> >>>
> >>> I think it would be great if someone wrote up a small KIP providing
> > some
> >>> standardized settings that we could get future additions
> >> automatically
> >>> umbrella'd under, e.g. no need to do a KIP if just adding a
> > consumer.config
> >>> or consumer-property config conforming to existing expectations for
> > other
> >>> tools. We could also standardize on a few other settings names that
> >> are
> >>> inconsistent across different tools and set out a clear path
> forward
> > for
> >>> future tools.
> >>>
> >>> I think I still have at least one open PR from when I first started
> >> on
> > the
> >>> project where I was trying to clean up some command line stuff to
> be
> > more
> >>> consistent. This has been an issue for many years now...
> >>>
> >>> -Ewen
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Eno Thereska <
> >> eno.there...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
>  +1 thanks.
> 
>  Eno
> > On 16 May 2017, at 04:20, BigData dev 
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> > Given the simple and non-controversial nature of the KIP, I would
> > like
> >>> to
> > start the voting process for KIP-157: Add consumer config options
> >> to
> > streams reset tool
> >
> > *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+
>  157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool
> >   157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool>*
> >
> >
> > The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Bharat
> 
> 
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> 
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>


Re: Reg: [VOTE] KIP 157 - Add consumer config options to streams reset tool

2017-05-19 Thread Matthias J. Sax
KIP-157 cannot be included in 0.11.0.0 anymore. KIP freeze date deadline
is strict.

-Matthias

On 5/19/17 10:15 AM, BigData dev wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
> I will start a new KIP for Kafka tools options to be a standard across all
> tools shortly. But I think the KIP 157 for Kafka Streams, should be needed
> for 0.11.0.0 release, (KIP freeze date is already over, but I think this is
> minor code change in tools to add option to streams reset tool) as without
> this consumer config options, it will not be possible to use the tool in a
> secured environment. Please let me know your thoughts on this. If it needs
> to be moved to next release, I will work on this as part of KIP 14.
> 
> Thanks,
> Bharat
> 
> 
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Matthias J. Sax 
> wrote:
> 
>> I double checked with Matthew Warhaftig (the original author of KIP-14)
>> and he has not interest to continue the KIP atm.
>>
>> Thus, Bharat can continue the work on KIP-14. I think it would be best,
>> to start a new DISCUSS thread after you update KIP-14.
>>
>> Thanks for your contributions!
>>
>>
>> -Matthias
>>
>>
>> On 5/17/17 12:56 PM, BigData dev wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> When I was trying to find more info, there is already a proposed KIP for
>>> this
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
>> 14+-+Tools+Standardization
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Bharat
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 12:38 PM, BigData dev 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Hi Ewen, Matthias,
 For common configuration across all the tools, I will work on that as
>> part
 of other KIP by looking into all Kafka tools.


 Thanks,
 Bharat


 On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Matthias J. Sax >>
 wrote:

> +1
>
> I also second Ewen comment -- standardizing the common supported
> parameters over all tools would be great!
>
>
> -Matthias
>
> On 5/17/17 12:57 AM, Damian Guy wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> On Wed, 17 May 2017 at 05:40 Ewen Cheslack-Postava >>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> I mentioned this in the PR that triggered this:
>>>
 KIP is accurate, though this is one of those things that we should
>>> probably get a KIP for a standard set of config options across all
> tools so
>>> additions like this can just fall under the umbrella of that KIP...
>>>
>>> I think it would be great if someone wrote up a small KIP providing
> some
>>> standardized settings that we could get future additions
>> automatically
>>> umbrella'd under, e.g. no need to do a KIP if just adding a
> consumer.config
>>> or consumer-property config conforming to existing expectations for
> other
>>> tools. We could also standardize on a few other settings names that
>> are
>>> inconsistent across different tools and set out a clear path forward
> for
>>> future tools.
>>>
>>> I think I still have at least one open PR from when I first started
>> on
> the
>>> project where I was trying to clean up some command line stuff to be
> more
>>> consistent. This has been an issue for many years now...
>>>
>>> -Ewen
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Eno Thereska <
>> eno.there...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
 +1 thanks.

 Eno
> On 16 May 2017, at 04:20, BigData dev 
> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
> Given the simple and non-controversial nature of the KIP, I would
> like
>>> to
> start the voting process for KIP-157: Add consumer config options
>> to
> streams reset tool
>
> *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+
 157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool
> *
>
>
> The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bharat


>>>
>>
>
>

>>>
>>
>>
> 



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Reg: [VOTE] KIP 157 - Add consumer config options to streams reset tool

2017-05-19 Thread BigData dev
Hi Matthias,
I will start a new KIP for Kafka tools options to be a standard across all
tools shortly. But I think the KIP 157 for Kafka Streams, should be needed
for 0.11.0.0 release, (KIP freeze date is already over, but I think this is
minor code change in tools to add option to streams reset tool) as without
this consumer config options, it will not be possible to use the tool in a
secured environment. Please let me know your thoughts on this. If it needs
to be moved to next release, I will work on this as part of KIP 14.

Thanks,
Bharat


On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Matthias J. Sax 
wrote:

> I double checked with Matthew Warhaftig (the original author of KIP-14)
> and he has not interest to continue the KIP atm.
>
> Thus, Bharat can continue the work on KIP-14. I think it would be best,
> to start a new DISCUSS thread after you update KIP-14.
>
> Thanks for your contributions!
>
>
> -Matthias
>
>
> On 5/17/17 12:56 PM, BigData dev wrote:
> > Hi,
> > When I was trying to find more info, there is already a proposed KIP for
> > this
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> 14+-+Tools+Standardization
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Bharat
> >
> > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 12:38 PM, BigData dev 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Ewen, Matthias,
> >> For common configuration across all the tools, I will work on that as
> part
> >> of other KIP by looking into all Kafka tools.
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Bharat
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Matthias J. Sax  >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> I also second Ewen comment -- standardizing the common supported
> >>> parameters over all tools would be great!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -Matthias
> >>>
> >>> On 5/17/17 12:57 AM, Damian Guy wrote:
>  +1
> 
>  On Wed, 17 May 2017 at 05:40 Ewen Cheslack-Postava  >
>  wrote:
> 
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > I mentioned this in the PR that triggered this:
> >
> >> KIP is accurate, though this is one of those things that we should
> > probably get a KIP for a standard set of config options across all
> >>> tools so
> > additions like this can just fall under the umbrella of that KIP...
> >
> > I think it would be great if someone wrote up a small KIP providing
> >>> some
> > standardized settings that we could get future additions
> automatically
> > umbrella'd under, e.g. no need to do a KIP if just adding a
> >>> consumer.config
> > or consumer-property config conforming to existing expectations for
> >>> other
> > tools. We could also standardize on a few other settings names that
> are
> > inconsistent across different tools and set out a clear path forward
> >>> for
> > future tools.
> >
> > I think I still have at least one open PR from when I first started
> on
> >>> the
> > project where I was trying to clean up some command line stuff to be
> >>> more
> > consistent. This has been an issue for many years now...
> >
> > -Ewen
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Eno Thereska <
> eno.there...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> +1 thanks.
> >>
> >> Eno
> >>> On 16 May 2017, at 04:20, BigData dev 
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi All,
> >>> Given the simple and non-controversial nature of the KIP, I would
> >>> like
> > to
> >>> start the voting process for KIP-157: Add consumer config options
> to
> >>> streams reset tool
> >>>
> >>> *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+
> >> 157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool
> >>>  >> 157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool>*
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Bharat
> >>
> >>
> >
> 
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
>


Re: Reg: [VOTE] KIP 157 - Add consumer config options to streams reset tool

2017-05-19 Thread Matthias J. Sax
I double checked with Matthew Warhaftig (the original author of KIP-14)
and he has not interest to continue the KIP atm.

Thus, Bharat can continue the work on KIP-14. I think it would be best,
to start a new DISCUSS thread after you update KIP-14.

Thanks for your contributions!


-Matthias


On 5/17/17 12:56 PM, BigData dev wrote:
> Hi,
> When I was trying to find more info, there is already a proposed KIP for
> this
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-14+-+Tools+Standardization
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Bharat
> 
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 12:38 PM, BigData dev 
> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Ewen, Matthias,
>> For common configuration across all the tools, I will work on that as part
>> of other KIP by looking into all Kafka tools.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Bharat
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Matthias J. Sax 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> I also second Ewen comment -- standardizing the common supported
>>> parameters over all tools would be great!
>>>
>>>
>>> -Matthias
>>>
>>> On 5/17/17 12:57 AM, Damian Guy wrote:
 +1

 On Wed, 17 May 2017 at 05:40 Ewen Cheslack-Postava 
 wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> I mentioned this in the PR that triggered this:
>
>> KIP is accurate, though this is one of those things that we should
> probably get a KIP for a standard set of config options across all
>>> tools so
> additions like this can just fall under the umbrella of that KIP...
>
> I think it would be great if someone wrote up a small KIP providing
>>> some
> standardized settings that we could get future additions automatically
> umbrella'd under, e.g. no need to do a KIP if just adding a
>>> consumer.config
> or consumer-property config conforming to existing expectations for
>>> other
> tools. We could also standardize on a few other settings names that are
> inconsistent across different tools and set out a clear path forward
>>> for
> future tools.
>
> I think I still have at least one open PR from when I first started on
>>> the
> project where I was trying to clean up some command line stuff to be
>>> more
> consistent. This has been an issue for many years now...
>
> -Ewen
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Eno Thereska 
> wrote:
>
>> +1 thanks.
>>
>> Eno
>>> On 16 May 2017, at 04:20, BigData dev 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>> Given the simple and non-controversial nature of the KIP, I would
>>> like
> to
>>> start the voting process for KIP-157: Add consumer config options to
>>> streams reset tool
>>>
>>> *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+
>> 157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool
>>> > 157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool>*
>>>
>>>
>>> The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Bharat
>>
>>
>

>>>
>>>
>>
> 



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Reg: [VOTE] KIP 157 - Add consumer config options to streams reset tool

2017-05-17 Thread BigData dev
Hi,
When I was trying to find more info, there is already a proposed KIP for
this
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-14+-+Tools+Standardization


Thanks,
Bharat

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 12:38 PM, BigData dev 
wrote:

> Hi Ewen, Matthias,
> For common configuration across all the tools, I will work on that as part
> of other KIP by looking into all Kafka tools.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Bharat
>
>
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Matthias J. Sax 
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> I also second Ewen comment -- standardizing the common supported
>> parameters over all tools would be great!
>>
>>
>> -Matthias
>>
>> On 5/17/17 12:57 AM, Damian Guy wrote:
>> > +1
>> >
>> > On Wed, 17 May 2017 at 05:40 Ewen Cheslack-Postava 
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> +1 (binding)
>> >>
>> >> I mentioned this in the PR that triggered this:
>> >>
>> >>> KIP is accurate, though this is one of those things that we should
>> >> probably get a KIP for a standard set of config options across all
>> tools so
>> >> additions like this can just fall under the umbrella of that KIP...
>> >>
>> >> I think it would be great if someone wrote up a small KIP providing
>> some
>> >> standardized settings that we could get future additions automatically
>> >> umbrella'd under, e.g. no need to do a KIP if just adding a
>> consumer.config
>> >> or consumer-property config conforming to existing expectations for
>> other
>> >> tools. We could also standardize on a few other settings names that are
>> >> inconsistent across different tools and set out a clear path forward
>> for
>> >> future tools.
>> >>
>> >> I think I still have at least one open PR from when I first started on
>> the
>> >> project where I was trying to clean up some command line stuff to be
>> more
>> >> consistent. This has been an issue for many years now...
>> >>
>> >> -Ewen
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Eno Thereska 
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> +1 thanks.
>> >>>
>> >>> Eno
>>  On 16 May 2017, at 04:20, BigData dev 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>  Hi All,
>>  Given the simple and non-controversial nature of the KIP, I would
>> like
>> >> to
>>  start the voting process for KIP-157: Add consumer config options to
>>  streams reset tool
>> 
>>  *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+
>> >>> 157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool
>>  > >>> 157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool>*
>> 
>> 
>>  The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
>> 
>>  Thanks,
>> 
>>  Bharat
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>


Re: Reg: [VOTE] KIP 157 - Add consumer config options to streams reset tool

2017-05-17 Thread BigData dev
Hi Ewen, Matthias,
For common configuration across all the tools, I will work on that as part
of other KIP by looking into all Kafka tools.


Thanks,
Bharat


On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Matthias J. Sax 
wrote:

> +1
>
> I also second Ewen comment -- standardizing the common supported
> parameters over all tools would be great!
>
>
> -Matthias
>
> On 5/17/17 12:57 AM, Damian Guy wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > On Wed, 17 May 2017 at 05:40 Ewen Cheslack-Postava 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> +1 (binding)
> >>
> >> I mentioned this in the PR that triggered this:
> >>
> >>> KIP is accurate, though this is one of those things that we should
> >> probably get a KIP for a standard set of config options across all
> tools so
> >> additions like this can just fall under the umbrella of that KIP...
> >>
> >> I think it would be great if someone wrote up a small KIP providing some
> >> standardized settings that we could get future additions automatically
> >> umbrella'd under, e.g. no need to do a KIP if just adding a
> consumer.config
> >> or consumer-property config conforming to existing expectations for
> other
> >> tools. We could also standardize on a few other settings names that are
> >> inconsistent across different tools and set out a clear path forward for
> >> future tools.
> >>
> >> I think I still have at least one open PR from when I first started on
> the
> >> project where I was trying to clean up some command line stuff to be
> more
> >> consistent. This has been an issue for many years now...
> >>
> >> -Ewen
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Eno Thereska 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1 thanks.
> >>>
> >>> Eno
>  On 16 May 2017, at 04:20, BigData dev 
> wrote:
> 
>  Hi All,
>  Given the simple and non-controversial nature of the KIP, I would like
> >> to
>  start the voting process for KIP-157: Add consumer config options to
>  streams reset tool
> 
>  *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+
> >>> 157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool
>   >>> 157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool>*
> 
> 
>  The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
> 
>  Thanks,
> 
>  Bharat
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
>


Re: Reg: [VOTE] KIP 157 - Add consumer config options to streams reset tool

2017-05-17 Thread Matthias J. Sax
+1

I also second Ewen comment -- standardizing the common supported
parameters over all tools would be great!


-Matthias

On 5/17/17 12:57 AM, Damian Guy wrote:
> +1
> 
> On Wed, 17 May 2017 at 05:40 Ewen Cheslack-Postava 
> wrote:
> 
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> I mentioned this in the PR that triggered this:
>>
>>> KIP is accurate, though this is one of those things that we should
>> probably get a KIP for a standard set of config options across all tools so
>> additions like this can just fall under the umbrella of that KIP...
>>
>> I think it would be great if someone wrote up a small KIP providing some
>> standardized settings that we could get future additions automatically
>> umbrella'd under, e.g. no need to do a KIP if just adding a consumer.config
>> or consumer-property config conforming to existing expectations for other
>> tools. We could also standardize on a few other settings names that are
>> inconsistent across different tools and set out a clear path forward for
>> future tools.
>>
>> I think I still have at least one open PR from when I first started on the
>> project where I was trying to clean up some command line stuff to be more
>> consistent. This has been an issue for many years now...
>>
>> -Ewen
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Eno Thereska 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 thanks.
>>>
>>> Eno
 On 16 May 2017, at 04:20, BigData dev  wrote:

 Hi All,
 Given the simple and non-controversial nature of the KIP, I would like
>> to
 start the voting process for KIP-157: Add consumer config options to
 streams reset tool

 *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+
>>> 157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool
 >> 157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool>*


 The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.

 Thanks,

 Bharat
>>>
>>>
>>
> 



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Reg: [VOTE] KIP 157 - Add consumer config options to streams reset tool

2017-05-17 Thread Damian Guy
+1

On Wed, 17 May 2017 at 05:40 Ewen Cheslack-Postava 
wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> I mentioned this in the PR that triggered this:
>
> > KIP is accurate, though this is one of those things that we should
> probably get a KIP for a standard set of config options across all tools so
> additions like this can just fall under the umbrella of that KIP...
>
> I think it would be great if someone wrote up a small KIP providing some
> standardized settings that we could get future additions automatically
> umbrella'd under, e.g. no need to do a KIP if just adding a consumer.config
> or consumer-property config conforming to existing expectations for other
> tools. We could also standardize on a few other settings names that are
> inconsistent across different tools and set out a clear path forward for
> future tools.
>
> I think I still have at least one open PR from when I first started on the
> project where I was trying to clean up some command line stuff to be more
> consistent. This has been an issue for many years now...
>
> -Ewen
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Eno Thereska 
> wrote:
>
> > +1 thanks.
> >
> > Eno
> > > On 16 May 2017, at 04:20, BigData dev  wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi All,
> > > Given the simple and non-controversial nature of the KIP, I would like
> to
> > > start the voting process for KIP-157: Add consumer config options to
> > > streams reset tool
> > >
> > > *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+
> > 157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool
> > >  > 157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool>*
> > >
> > >
> > > The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Bharat
> >
> >
>


Re: Reg: [VOTE] KIP 157 - Add consumer config options to streams reset tool

2017-05-16 Thread Ewen Cheslack-Postava
+1 (binding)

I mentioned this in the PR that triggered this:

> KIP is accurate, though this is one of those things that we should
probably get a KIP for a standard set of config options across all tools so
additions like this can just fall under the umbrella of that KIP...

I think it would be great if someone wrote up a small KIP providing some
standardized settings that we could get future additions automatically
umbrella'd under, e.g. no need to do a KIP if just adding a consumer.config
or consumer-property config conforming to existing expectations for other
tools. We could also standardize on a few other settings names that are
inconsistent across different tools and set out a clear path forward for
future tools.

I think I still have at least one open PR from when I first started on the
project where I was trying to clean up some command line stuff to be more
consistent. This has been an issue for many years now...

-Ewen



On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Eno Thereska 
wrote:

> +1 thanks.
>
> Eno
> > On 16 May 2017, at 04:20, BigData dev  wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> > Given the simple and non-controversial nature of the KIP, I would like to
> > start the voting process for KIP-157: Add consumer config options to
> > streams reset tool
> >
> > *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+
> 157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool
> >  157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool>*
> >
> >
> > The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Bharat
>
>


Re: Reg: [VOTE] KIP 157 - Add consumer config options to streams reset tool

2017-05-16 Thread Eno Thereska
+1 thanks.

Eno
> On 16 May 2017, at 04:20, BigData dev  wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
> Given the simple and non-controversial nature of the KIP, I would like to
> start the voting process for KIP-157: Add consumer config options to
> streams reset tool
> 
> *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool
> *
> 
> 
> The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bharat



Reg: [VOTE] KIP 157 - Add consumer config options to streams reset tool

2017-05-15 Thread BigData dev
Hi All,
Given the simple and non-controversial nature of the KIP, I would like to
start the voting process for KIP-157: Add consumer config options to
streams reset tool

*https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool
*


The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.

Thanks,

Bharat