+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On 19/01/2020 22:49, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I submit Apache Karaf runtime 4.2.8 to your vote. This is a
> maintenance release on the 4.2.x series, bringing updates, improvements
> and fixes.
>
> Release Notes:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Re
+1 (bindng)
best regards, Achim
Am Mi., 22. Jan. 2020 um 18:36 Uhr schrieb Jamie G. <
jamie.goody...@gmail.com>:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Cheers,
> Jamie
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 11:15 AM Freeman Fang
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (Binding)
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Freeman
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 4:49
+1 (binding)
Cheers,
Jamie
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 11:15 AM Freeman Fang wrote:
>
> +1 (Binding)
>
> Thanks!
> Freeman
>
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 4:49 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I submit Apache Karaf runtime 4.2.8 to your vote. This is a
> > maintenance release on
+1 (Binding)
Thanks!
Freeman
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 4:49 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I submit Apache Karaf runtime 4.2.8 to your vote. This is a
> maintenance release on the 4.2.x series, bringing updates, improvements
> and fixes.
>
> Release Notes:
>
> https://issues.apache.
That's a good point and important thing to solved !
GPL2 license is not acceptable, so, I will fix that asap.
Regards
JB
On 20/01/2020 14:24, Fabian Lange wrote:
> Just to clarify: this is not a showstopper for me (therefore my +1)
> Our distribution process runs a license checker and that notic
Just to clarify: this is not a showstopper for me (therefore my +1)
Our distribution process runs a license checker and that noticed the extra jar.
We excluded it from being packaged and everything is fine.
I also expect that other users due the same due diligence.
The file does have the CDDL 1.0+
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks!
Am Mo., 20. Jan. 2020 um 13:27 Uhr schrieb Fabian Lange
:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> findings:
> * pax-logging + knoplerfish issue resolved
> * wrap + logging dependency/ordering issue resolved
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-2925 - IMHO this should
> be fix
Hi Fabian,
About KARAF-2925, let me check about an alternative dep.
Regards
JB
On 20/01/2020 13:26, Fabian Lange wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> findings:
> * pax-logging + knoplerfish issue resolved
> * wrap + logging dependency/ordering issue resolved
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/K
+1 (non-binding)
findings:
* pax-logging + knoplerfish issue resolved
* wrap + logging dependency/ordering issue resolved
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-2925 - IMHO this should
be fixed. Karaf now ships a 10 year old unmaintained early access jar
with no source or licensing info on
+1 (binding)
regards,
François
fpa...@apache.org
Le 19/01/2020 à 22:49, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I submit Apache Karaf runtime 4.2.8 to your vote. This is a
> maintenance release on the 4.2.x series, bringing updates, improvements
> and fixes.
>
> Release Notes:
> https://iss
+1 (binding)
I checked assemblies/apache-karaf/target/bundle-report.xml in source tree
and it looks good and consistent.
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
pon., 20 sty 2020 o 06:45 Romain Manni-Bucau
napisał(a):
> +1 (non binding) - for some asf itests and "simple" apps (no multipart in
> them ;))
>
>
+1 (non binding) - for some asf itests and "simple" apps (no multipart in
them ;))
Le dim. 19 janv. 2020 à 22:49, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a
écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I submit Apache Karaf runtime 4.2.8 to your vote. This is a
> maintenance release on the 4.2.x series, bringing updates, improvements
> a
+1
I suggest that the non working multi part handling should be added to
a known issue for 4.2.7 and 4.2.8. So it is at least visible for
everyone who looks for known issues in front of migration.
I worked around the problem in my custom distributions.
Am Mi., 15. Jan. 2020 um 05:41 Uhr schrieb J
Hi Benjamin,
I confirm that I reproduce the issue on Windows VM with JDK 13. The fix
is straight forward (about the line ending).
I created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-6596 and I will
fix that for cut 4.2.9 super fast.
Regards
JB
On 15/01/2020 08:54, Benjamin Graf wrote:
> Hi J
That's probably a merge. Let me fix that.
Regards
JB
On 15/01/2020 08:54, Benjamin Graf wrote:
> Hi JB,
>
> changing line ending from unix to windows seems to solve the issue.
> Maybe some strange interpreter problem of the windows shell itself. I
> would suggest to change line ending for all ba
Hi JB,
changing line ending from unix to windows seems to solve the issue.
Maybe some strange interpreter problem of the windows shell itself. I
would suggest to change line ending for all bat-files in the karaf
distribution.
What do you think?
Regards
Benjamin
On 15.01.2020 08:47, Benjamin Gr
Hi JB,
it's fine with JDK8. That's why I found the issue quite late.
Regards
Benjamin
On 15.01.2020 08:42, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi Benjamin,
>
> does it happen with JDK8 ?
>
> I will fix for Karaf 4.2.9 and provide a workaround in the mean time.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 15/01/2020 08:26
Hi Benjamin,
does it happen with JDK8 ?
I will fix for Karaf 4.2.9 and provide a workaround in the mean time.
Regards
JB
On 15/01/2020 08:26, Benjamin Graf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm facing a issue while starting under Windows 10 and JDK 11:
>
> It seems there is a strange issue added in karaf.bat
Hi,
I'm facing a issue while starting under Windows 10 and JDK 11:
It seems there is a strange issue added in karaf.bat between 4.2.7 and
4.2.8. Some error also on actual 4.3 SNAPSHOTS.
Regards,
Benjamin
On 12.01.2020 12:34, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I submit Apache Karaf runti
By the way, you can take a look on Release Notes where you have the
dependency updates.
Regards
JB
On 14/01/2020 21:51, Eric Lilja wrote:
> Unfortunately, I haven't been able to test it on Windows, so cannot vote. I
> like to a do a manual test and also run some automated pax exam tests, but
> do
It will be part of the announcement PR:
https://github.com/apache/karaf-site/pull/51
I will generate one soon.
Regards
JB
On 14/01/2020 21:51, Eric Lilja wrote:
> Unfortunately, I haven't been able to test it on Windows, so cannot vote. I
> like to a do a manual test and also run some automated
IMHO, it's not 4.2.8 blocker. I can always do 4.2.9 very fast if needed.
Regards
JB
On 14/01/2020 21:27, Markus Rathgeb wrote:
> Hm, for me it depends if the multi part stuff that has been broken on
> 4.2.7 is working again (so depends on the findings of the respective
> thread on the user mailin
Unfortunately, I haven't been able to test it on Windows, so cannot vote. I
like to a do a manual test and also run some automated pax exam tests, but
don't have time right now. I was also curious if there's an updated
dependency convergence report, and a comparison with the equivalent report
for 4
Hm, for me it depends if the multi part stuff that has been broken on
4.2.7 is working again (so depends on the findings of the respective
thread on the user mailing list).
+1
Le dim. 12 janv. 2020 à 12:34, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a
écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I submit Apache Karaf runtime 4.2.8 to your vote. This is a
> maintenance release on the 4.2.x series, bringing updates, improvements
> and fixes.
>
> Release Notes:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNo
+1 (binding)
Cheers,
Jamie
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 11:04 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 12/01/2020 12:34, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I submit Apache Karaf runtime 4.2.8 to your vote. This is a
> > maintenance release on the 4.2.x seri
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On 12/01/2020 12:34, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I submit Apache Karaf runtime 4.2.8 to your vote. This is a
> maintenance release on the 4.2.x series, bringing updates, improvements
> and fixes.
>
> Release Notes:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Re
+1 binding
Christian
Am So., 12. Jan. 2020 um 12:34 Uhr schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
j...@nanthrax.net>:
> Hi all,
>
> I submit Apache Karaf runtime 4.2.8 to your vote. This is a
> maintenance release on the 4.2.x series, bringing updates, improvements
> and fixes.
>
> Release Notes:
>
> https
+1 (binding)
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
pon., 13 sty 2020 o 09:46 Achim Nierbeck
napisał(a):
> +1 (binding)
>
> regards, Achim
>
>
> Am Mo., 13. Jan. 2020 um 09:45 Uhr schrieb Roedl Lukas <
> lukas.ro...@ait.ac.at>:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > regards,
> > Lukas
> >
> > -Ursprüngliche Nach
+1 (binding)
regards, Achim
Am Mo., 13. Jan. 2020 um 09:45 Uhr schrieb Roedl Lukas <
lukas.ro...@ait.ac.at>:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> regards,
> Lukas
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 12. Januar 2020 12:34
> An: Karaf Dev
> Betreff: [VOTE] A
+1 (binding)
regards,
François
fpa...@apache.org
Le 12/01/2020 à 12:34, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I submit Apache Karaf runtime 4.2.8 to your vote. This is a
> maintenance release on the 4.2.x series, bringing updates, improvements
> and fixes.
>
> Release Notes:
> https://iss
+1 (non binding)
Cheers.
Thanks JB
--
Andrea Cosentino
--
Apache Camel PMC Chair
Apache Karaf Committer
Apache Servicemix PMC Member
Email: ancosen1...@yahoo.com
Twitter: @oscerd2
Github: oscerd
On Sunday, January 12, 2020, 12:34:39 PM GMT+1, Jean-Baptiste
+1 (binding)
Thanks!
Freeman
On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 6:34 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I submit Apache Karaf runtime 4.2.8 to your vote. This is a
> maintenance release on the 4.2.x series, bringing updates, improvements
> and fixes.
>
> Release Notes:
>
> https://issues.apache.
+1 (non binding)
Le dim. 12 janv. 2020 à 12:34, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a
écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I submit Apache Karaf runtime 4.2.8 to your vote. This is a
> maintenance release on the 4.2.x series, bringing updates, improvements
> and fixes.
>
> Release Notes:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/se
34 matches
Mail list logo
