Re: The future of gemini-blueprint, take 2 + results

2016-12-19 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Bye ;) Regards JB On 12/19/2016 04:12 PM, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: Hell, OK, back to this issue. I built entire Karaf 4.1 with (i)tests using "-Dmaven.repo.local=/work/.m2" after removal of gemini-blueprint features and repositories. I had to remove hibernate 3.x features as well to make the

Re: The future of gemini-blueprint, take 2 + results

2016-12-19 Thread Grzegorz Grzybek
Amen | Żegnajcie | Goodbye then regards Grzegorz 2016-12-19 16:14 GMT+01:00 Guillaume Nodet : > 2016-12-19 16:12 GMT+01:00 Grzegorz Grzybek : > > > Hell, > > > > OK, back to this issue. I built entire Karaf 4.1 with (i)tests using > >

Re: The future of gemini-blueprint

2016-10-17 Thread David Jencks
+1 david jencks > On Oct 17, 2016, at 2:33 AM, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: > > Hello > > I've created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-4774 to consider > deprecation/removal of gemini-blueprint support. > > I had this idea after reviewing Maven usage in Karaf4.

Re: The future of gemini-blueprint

2016-10-17 Thread Freeman Fang
+1 Thanks! － Freeman(Yue) Fang Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat > On Oct 17, 2016, at 5:33 PM, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: > > Hello > > I've created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-4774 to consider > deprecation/removal of

Re: The future of gemini-blueprint

2016-10-17 Thread Achim Nierbeck
+1 regards, Achim 2016-10-17 12:36 GMT+02:00 Sobkowiak Krzysztof : > +1 (non-binding) > > Regards > Krzysztof > > On 17.10.2016 11:33, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: > > Hello > > > > I've created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-4774 to > consider > >

Re: The future of gemini-blueprint

2016-10-17 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 Regards JB On 10/17/2016 11:33 AM, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: Hello I've created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-4774 to consider deprecation/removal of gemini-blueprint support. I had this idea after reviewing Maven usage in Karaf4. Currently there's following configuration of

Re: The future of gemini-blueprint

2016-10-17 Thread Guillaume Nodet
+1 we should remove any reference to the old spring repos Fwiw, there has been a 2.0.0.RELEASE version of gemini blueprint released last april and the related artifacts are available from maven central. With the spring namespaces now being supported by aries blueprint, I think we should get rid

Re: The future of gemini-blueprint

2016-10-17 Thread Andrea Cosentino
+1 (non-binding) to remove it. -- Andrea Cosentino -- Apache Camel PMC Member Apache Karaf Committer Apache Servicemix Committer Email: ancosen1...@yahoo.com Twitter: @oscerd2 Github: oscerd On Monday, October 17, 2016 11:42 AM, Christian Schneider

Re: The future of gemini-blueprint

2016-10-17 Thread Christian Schneider
+1 to remove it. Christian On 17.10.2016 11:33, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: Hello I've created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-4774 to consider deprecation/removal of gemini-blueprint support. I had this idea after reviewing Maven usage in Karaf4. Currently there's following