Re: OKD 4 - A Modest Proposal

2019-06-28 Thread Clayton Coleman
On Jun 28, 2019, at 3:38 AM, Daniel Comnea wrote: On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 4:58 AM Clayton Coleman wrote: > > On Jun 26, 2019, at 1:08 PM, Colin Walters wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2019, at 5:20 PM, Clayton Coleman wrote: > > > > > >> Because the operating system integration is so

Re: OKD 4 - A Modest Proposal

2019-06-28 Thread Daniel Comnea
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 4:58 AM Clayton Coleman wrote: > > On Jun 26, 2019, at 1:08 PM, Colin Walters wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2019, at 5:20 PM, Clayton Coleman wrote: > > > > > >> Because the operating system integration is so critical, we need to > >> make sure that the major

Re: OKD 4 - A Modest Proposal

2019-06-27 Thread Clayton Coleman
> On Jun 26, 2019, at 1:08 PM, Colin Walters wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2019, at 5:20 PM, Clayton Coleman wrote: > > >> Because the operating system integration is so critical, we need to >> make sure that the major components (ostree, ignition, and the kubelet) >> are tied together in a

Re: OKD 4 - A Modest Proposal

2019-06-26 Thread Daniel Comnea
Sorry for missing out the mailer by mistake, not intentional. PSB in blue. On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 10:14 PM Daniel Comnea wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 6:09 PM Colin Walters wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 20, 2019, at 5:20 PM, Clayton Coleman wrote: >> >> >> > Because the operating

Re: OKD 4 - A Modest Proposal

2019-06-26 Thread Michael Gugino
In Fedora Atomic, it was trivial to build a custom ostree image. I would hope the same is available for the FCOS model as well. On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 1:36 PM Colin Walters wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 26, 2019, at 1:10 PM, Colin Walters wrote: > > > The tricky thing here is...if we want this to

Re: OKD 4 - A Modest Proposal

2019-06-26 Thread Colin Walters
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019, at 1:10 PM, Colin Walters wrote: > The tricky thing here is...if we want this to work the same as OpenShift 4/OCP > with RHEL CoreOS, then what we're really talking about here is a *derivative* > of FCOS that for example embeds the kubelet from OKD. And short term > it

Re: OKD 4 - A Modest Proposal

2019-06-26 Thread Colin Walters
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019, at 5:20 PM, Clayton Coleman wrote: > Because the operating system integration is so critical, we need to > make sure that the major components (ostree, ignition, and the kubelet) > are tied together in a CoreOS distribution that can be quickly > refreshed with OKD -

OKD 4 - A Modest Proposal

2019-06-20 Thread Clayton Coleman
TL:DR - I can’t even summarize this, but it’s worth it to read! First, I’ll start this off with an apology - I intended to draft an OKD 4 proposal many months ago, but I kept pushing it back to fix “just one more bug”, and as a result there’s been a real gap in regular summarization across the