On 2/14/18 5:36 AM, Alan Pevec wrote:
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 6:05 PM, Michael Turek
wrote:
Sorry for the confusion Haïkel, See link [1] for what I'm talking about
https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos7-queens/deps/latest/ppc64le/
That must have been mistake during recent deps repo sync, I'll cl
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 6:05 PM, Michael Turek
wrote:
> Sorry for the confusion Haïkel, See link [1] for what I'm talking about
> https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos7-queens/deps/latest/ppc64le/
That must have been mistake during recent deps repo sync, I'll clean that up.
Cheers,
Alan
__
On 2/13/18 11:51 AM, Haïkel Guémar wrote:
On 02/13/2018 05:00 PM, Michael Turek wrote:
Hey RDO,
Continued to play with the build of RDO in rdotrunk [0] and noticed
another problem with the deps [1]. If you ctrl+f for x86_64, you'll
see that the following packages are listed as (and I'm assum
On 02/13/2018 05:00 PM, Michael Turek wrote:
Hey RDO,
Continued to play with the build of RDO in rdotrunk [0] and noticed
another problem with the deps [1]. If you ctrl+f for x86_64, you'll see
that the following packages are listed as (and I'm assuming actually
are) x86_64 builds:
python-g