Hello Everyone,
I'm devoloping a Plugin, and I have 2 questions:
1) How can I user a $label['variable'] content as HTML and not as Plain
Text?
2) I can use a to include a file from my
plugin templates directory?
Thanks
Aurelio
___
Roundcube
Thanks Thomas!
Em 01/09/2016 12:59, Thomas Bruederli escreveu:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:55 PM, Aurélio de Souza Ribeiro Neto
wrote:
Hi All,
Where I can found a list of template objects?
I can't foun it in Wiki and the link is broken.
The wiki has moved. The
Both, of course.
The behavior by default is set in settings. When writing the letter
there shall be an opportunity to make an exception.
Best regards,
Vladimir.
Kyle Francis писал 2016-09-01 09:19:
> Sweet Jesus I got it working!! Being passed through part_body, parsed and
>
On 30.08.2016 15:53, Kyle Francis wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> So I'm mostly finished with the implementation of the hybrid decryption
> model. So far I have the following working:
Ok, now when you have decryption covered, I have a question. What's
next? As I understand the main reason for this
On 09/01/2016 02:21 PM, Kyle Francis wrote:
> Signing should not be terribly complicated. We could make a call to
> Mailvelope via enigma.js for the public key (api call already exists,
> export PublicKey) and then pass to Crypt_GPG for signing.
To sign a message you need a private key. For
On Sep 1, 2016 2:43 AM, "A.L.E.C" wrote:
>
> On 30.08.2016 15:53, Kyle Francis wrote:
> > Hey everyone,
> >
> > So I'm mostly finished with the implementation of the hybrid decryption
> > model. So far I have the following working:
>
> Ok, now when you have decryption covered, I
On Sep 1, 2016 8:41 AM, "A.L.E.C" wrote:
>
> On 09/01/2016 02:21 PM, Kyle Francis wrote:
> > Signing should not be terribly complicated. We could make a call to
> > Mailvelope via enigma.js for the public key (api call already exists,
> > export PublicKey) and then pass to
On 09/01/2016 04:00 PM, Kyle Francis wrote:
>> To sign a message you need a private key. For encryption you need only
>> public keys.
>
> That would be correct, haha. So I wonder if it would be possible to
> hash the message server side, then encrypt the hash with the private key
> on the client