On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 01:35:55PM -0600, Peter Harpending wrote:
> Hi, everyone,
>
> I wrote a mechanism library a few months ago, which I don't believe
> was ever merged into the main code tree. Then, I had summer classes,
> and several deaths in my family, so I haven't been paying much
>
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 12:50:00AM -0600, Peter Harpending wrote:
> I need to go to bed, but tomorrow, I'll try to work on gluing the
> mechanism to the rest of Snowdrift.
I would hold off on doing this, or at least run your plan past me
first. It involves core architecture decisions.
Thanks!
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 09:13:53AM -0600, Peter Harpending wrote:
> On 03/15/2016 12:50 AM, Peter Harpending wrote:
> > code that requires one to use the feature, so I vote that
>
> Silly me, I forgot to mention how I vote. I vote that we leave it for
> now, because it's unlikely to cause any
On 03/14/2016 05:10 PM, Bryan Richter wrote:
> 1. I'm not sure the Eq instances of MechPatron and MechProject are
> sound. As defined, `==` is the moral equivalent of checking that the
> two values cannot both exist in the database at the same time
> (database uniqueness), but that's not quite
