FYI I'm cancelling this vote in favor of rc2.
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 2:01 PM Marcelo Vanzin wrote:
>
> This vote is for releasing Livy 0.6.0 based on RC1.
>
> The vote will be open at least 72 hours until Thursday March 21st, 21:00 UTC
> and
> will pass with a minimum of 3 +1 binding votes and
I played with this a bit; found out it's generated by a maven plugin
enabled during the packaging.
The plugin seems to list everything; if a library is multi-licensed,
it will list the library multiple times. It doesn't seem there's a way
to choose which license to pick for a library, and that's
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 4:03 PM Marcelo Vanzin
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 2:23 PM Luciano Resende wrote:
> > Also, there are lots of version mismatching between the included jars
> > and the third-party license file
>
> Could you be a little more explicit about this one? I don't even see
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 2:23 PM Luciano Resende wrote:
> Also, there are lots of version mismatching between the included jars
> and the third-party license file
Could you be a little more explicit about this one? I don't even see a
3rd party license file. What exactly is the expectation here?
-1
There has been a lot of discussion around this, but at the moment it's
not acceptable to have binary jars in a source release.
Also, there are lots of version mismatching between the included jars
and the third-party license file
Minor:
Extract folder should prefix apache in the name (e.g.
